Four Parshiot: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Parshat Zachor
(→Parshat Zachor: added clarification) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 250: | Line 250: | ||
#Some say that the word Zecher (with Segol) and some say Zaycher (with Tzeyreh) and so it’s proper to read it twice.<ref>Mishna Brurah 685:18 </ref> Some say that one should read the entire פסוק twice <ref>Moadim UZmanim (vol 2, siman 167), Piskei Teshuvot 685:9 </ref> while others say it’s enough to read the words Zecher Amalek or Timcheh Et Zecher Amalek a second time.<ref>Kesot HaShulchan 88:22 in the notes, Kitzur S”A 88:22, Piskei Teshuvot 685:9, Sh”t Igrot Moshe 8:20:32 (pg 67). Piskei Shemuot (pg 40) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that either minhag is acceptable. Piskei Shemuot (39-40) quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky as saying it’s enough to repeat a few words. </ref> | #Some say that the word Zecher (with Segol) and some say Zaycher (with Tzeyreh) and so it’s proper to read it twice.<ref>Mishna Brurah 685:18 </ref> Some say that one should read the entire פסוק twice <ref>Moadim UZmanim (vol 2, siman 167), Piskei Teshuvot 685:9 </ref> while others say it’s enough to read the words Zecher Amalek or Timcheh Et Zecher Amalek a second time.<ref>Kesot HaShulchan 88:22 in the notes, Kitzur S”A 88:22, Piskei Teshuvot 685:9, Sh”t Igrot Moshe 8:20:32 (pg 67). Piskei Shemuot (pg 40) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman as saying that either minhag is acceptable. Piskei Shemuot (39-40) quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky as saying it’s enough to repeat a few words. </ref> | ||
#When reading the פרשה of Zachor in Ki Tetse during the year the minhag is to read it Zaycher (with Tzeyreh).<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:9 </ref> | #When reading the פרשה of Zachor in Ki Tetse during the year the minhag is to read it Zaycher (with Tzeyreh).<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:9 </ref> | ||
#An Ashkenazi shouldn’t hear Parshat Zachor from a Sephardic Baal Koreh and a Sephardi shouldn’t hear the Parshat Zachor from an Ashkenazic Baal Koreh | #An Ashkenazi shouldn’t hear Parshat Zachor from a Sephardic Baal Koreh and a Sephardi shouldn’t hear the Parshat Zachor from an Ashkenazic Baal Koreh.<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:10, Sh"t Binyan Shlomo 54, Piskei Shemuot quoting Rav Shlomo Zalman and Rav Elyashiv </ref> and some say that this is only preferable but after the fact one has fulfilled one’s obligation.<ref>Rav Nassim Karlitz quoted in Piskei Shemuot (pg 41). Yalkut Yosef ([[Kriyat HaTorah]] pg 111 and Moadim pg 260) and Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:11 write that it’s proper for a Sephardi to hear it from a Sephardi. </ref> | ||
#Some say that one should hear the same dialect of Hebrew one speaks and the minhag is to be concerned for this<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:10. Piskei Shemuot (pg 41) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman saying that it’s not kavod tzibbur to read parshat zachor several times in different dialects. </ref> | #Some say that one should hear the same dialect of Hebrew one speaks and the minhag is to be concerned for this.<ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:10. Piskei Shemuot (pg 41) quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman saying that it’s not kavod tzibbur to read parshat zachor several times in different dialects. </ref> | ||
#It’s important that one understands the general point and one fulfills one’s obligation even if one doesn’t understand every word.<ref>Rav Elyashiv quoted in Piskei Shemuot (pg 34) </ref> | #It’s important that one understands the general point and one fulfills one’s obligation even if one doesn’t understand every word.<ref>Rav Elyashiv quoted in Piskei Shemuot (pg 34) </ref> | ||
#Some say that if one misses one word one has not fulfilled one’s obligation <ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:10, Mikrei Kodesh [[Purim]] Siman 7 </ref> while others hold that as long as one heard the main point of destroying amalek one has fulfilled one’s obligation.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Halichot Shlomo 18:2)</ref> | #Some say that if one misses one word one has not fulfilled one’s obligation <ref>Piskei Teshuvot 685:10, Mikrei Kodesh [[Purim]] Siman 7 </ref> while others hold that as long as one heard the main point of destroying amalek one has fulfilled one’s obligation.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Halichot Shlomo 18:2)</ref> | ||
