Ramban: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m (Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim") |
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (rif halachot) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Klalim= | =Klalim= | ||
# Ramban first wrote his disagreements on the Sefer HaMitzvot and then his Sefer.<ref>Kesef Mishneh Hilchot Chametz uMatzah 1:6, Yad Malachi Yalkut Mefarshim.</ref> | # Ramban first wrote his disagreements on the Sefer HaMitzvot and then his Sefer.<ref>Kesef Mishneh Hilchot Chametz uMatzah 1:6, Yad Malachi Yalkut Mefarshim.</ref> | ||
# The Ramban did not have the [[Rambam]]'s Introduction to Perush HaMishnayot available to him, as Hebrew translations of the Arabic work were not yet available in Spain, according to the Yad Malachi, who posits that had they been available, the Ramban would not have been as quick to argue.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRambam 21)</ref> The [[Rashba]] did not have the Perush HaMishnah available at all either.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 8)</ref> | # The Ramban did not have the [[Rambam]]'s Introduction to Perush HaMishnayot available to him, as Hebrew translations of the Arabic work were not yet available in Spain, according to the Yad Malachi, who posits that had they been available, the Ramban would not have been as quick to argue.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRambam 21)</ref> The [[Rashba]] did not have the Perush HaMishnah available at all either.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 8)</ref> | ||
Line 7: | Line 5: | ||
# The Ramban's direct students and their own students include the [[Rashba]], [[Ra'ah]], and [[Sefer HaChinuch]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | # The Ramban's direct students and their own students include the [[Rashba]], [[Ra'ah]], and [[Sefer HaChinuch]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | ||
# In addition to his Chiddushim on Shas and Milchemet Hashem on the [[Rif]], the Ramban filled the void of Halachot Rav Alfasi on Nedarim and Bechorot by writing his own work in the same spirit as the [[Rif]]. The [[Rosh]] on those Masechtot, therefore, is quoting the Ramban, not the [[Rif]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | # In addition to his Chiddushim on Shas and Milchemet Hashem on the [[Rif]], the Ramban filled the void of Halachot Rav Alfasi on Nedarim and Bechorot by writing his own work in the same spirit as the [[Rif]]. The [[Rosh]] on those Masechtot, therefore, is quoting the Ramban, not the [[Rif]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | ||
# Later in life, the Ramban became engrossed with Kabbalah, which became a major basis for his commentary on the Torah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | # Later in life, the Ramban became engrossed with Kabbalah, which became a major basis for his commentary on the Torah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 162)</ref> | ||
=Further Reading= | =Further Reading= | ||
# [https://www.torahmusings.com/2018/05/later-rishonim-iv-catalonia/ Later Rishonim IV: Catalonia], by Rabbi Aryeh Leibowitz | # [https://www.torahmusings.com/2018/05/later-rishonim-iv-catalonia/ Later Rishonim IV: Catalonia], by Rabbi Aryeh Leibowitz | ||
Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
=Sources= | =Sources= | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Klalim]] |
Revision as of 18:23, 20 September 2018
Klalim
- Ramban first wrote his disagreements on the Sefer HaMitzvot and then his Sefer.[1]
- The Ramban did not have the Rambam's Introduction to Perush HaMishnayot available to him, as Hebrew translations of the Arabic work were not yet available in Spain, according to the Yad Malachi, who posits that had they been available, the Ramban would not have been as quick to argue.[2] The Rashba did not have the Perush HaMishnah available at all either.[3]
- Rabbeinu Yonah was a cousin of the Ramban, and his daughter married Shlomo, the Ramban's son.[4]
- The Ramban's direct students and their own students include the Rashba, Ra'ah, and Sefer HaChinuch.[5]
- In addition to his Chiddushim on Shas and Milchemet Hashem on the Rif, the Ramban filled the void of Halachot Rav Alfasi on Nedarim and Bechorot by writing his own work in the same spirit as the Rif. The Rosh on those Masechtot, therefore, is quoting the Ramban, not the Rif.[6]
- Later in life, the Ramban became engrossed with Kabbalah, which became a major basis for his commentary on the Torah.[7]
Further Reading
- Later Rishonim IV: Catalonia, by Rabbi Aryeh Leibowitz
- Later Rishonim V: Ramban’s Talmud Commentary, by Rabbi Aryeh Leibowitz