Klalei HaTalmud: Difference between revisions
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (→Amoraim: hilcheta kevatrai start) |
||
(25 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Overview== | == Overview == | ||
The Talmud is laden with extrapolations of the Torah and controversies between Tannaim and Amoraim. In order to understand the mechanisms at play and the means of deciding a Machaloket, it's incumbent to study the rules. Some are explicit in the Gemara, but their applications can get tricky, especially when competing with other rules and considerations. | The Talmud is laden with extrapolations of the Torah and controversies between Tannaim and Amoraim. In order to understand the mechanisms at play and the means of deciding a Machaloket, it's incumbent to study the rules. Some are explicit in the Gemara, but their applications can get tricky, especially when competing with other rules and considerations. | ||
Over the centuries, various works, such as Mevo HaTalmud, Halichot Olam, and their commentaries were compiled summarizing the rules and weighing them against one another. Often, their discussions consist of a deluge of citations proving or disproving a point by referencing sugyot spanning the entire corpus of Talmudic literature. Though adding all of those citations to this page would be heplful, thanks to the Sefaria plugin, due to the tediousness of the endeavor, as a minimum, we will suffice by quoting the Klalim Sefer at hand and leave it to the reader to do the rest of the groundwork. Most of these Sefarim are readily available and portions of many of them are printed in the back of the standard Masechet Berachot.<ref>As an aside, Rav Hershel Schachter ([http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/852308/rabbi-hershel-schachter/sanhedrin-73-psulei-edus-chiddush-of-edim-zomemim-yedias-hataaroves-tumat-yimei-leidah/ Sanhedrin 5775 #73]) is of the opinion that Klalim are ''postscriptive,'' not prescriptive, meaning the later generations voted on each issue and the results indicated that in certain situations a specific Tanna's position was usually followed. Thus they established the Klal as a Siman, not a Sibah, for deciding a Machaloket, but, of course, there are exceptions. This is just the ''general'' rule. This position is based on the writings of [https://www.yu.edu/riets/about/mission-history/historic-roshei/elazar-meir-preil Rav Elazar Meir Preil] in [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=943&st=&pgnum=354 HaMaor (vol. 1 Shu"t Siman 78:6)]</ref> | Over the centuries, various works, such as Mevo HaTalmud, Halichot Olam, and their commentaries were compiled summarizing the rules and weighing them against one another. Often, their discussions consist of a deluge of citations proving or disproving a point by referencing sugyot spanning the entire corpus of Talmudic literature. Though adding all of those citations to this page would be heplful, thanks to the Sefaria plugin, due to the tediousness of the endeavor, as a minimum, we will suffice by quoting the Klalim Sefer at hand and leave it to the reader to do the rest of the groundwork. Most of these Sefarim are readily available and portions of many of them are printed in the back of the standard Masechet Berachot.<ref>As an aside, Rav Hershel Schachter ([http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/852308/rabbi-hershel-schachter/sanhedrin-73-psulei-edus-chiddush-of-edim-zomemim-yedias-hataaroves-tumat-yimei-leidah/ Sanhedrin 5775 #73]) is of the opinion that Klalim are ''postscriptive,'' not prescriptive, meaning the later generations voted on each issue and the results indicated that in certain situations a specific Tanna's position was usually followed. Thus they established the Klal as a Siman, not a Sibah, for deciding a Machaloket, but, of course, there are exceptions. This is just the ''general'' rule. This position is based on the writings of [https://www.yu.edu/riets/about/mission-history/historic-roshei/elazar-meir-preil Rav Elazar Meir Preil] in [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=943&st=&pgnum=354 HaMaor (vol. 1 Shu"t Siman 78:6)]</ref> | ||
== | == Talmudic Praseology == | ||
# Sometimes, the Gemara will use the same phrase in different places but refer to totally different concepts, while, other times, it will use different phrases in different places to refer to the same concept.<ref>Numerous Rishonim cited in Halichot Olam 3:8, Yad Malachi Klalei HaTalmud 374</ref> | |||
== Deciding Machloket == | |||
The Gemara provides a few examples and general guidelines about how to decide debates between individuals mentioned in Shas. | |||
== | === Tannaim === | ||
==== Talmidei Rabbi Akiva (R' Meir, R' Yehudah, R' Shimon, and R' Yose) ==== | |||
# Rabbi Meir vs. Rabbi Yehuda, the Halacha follows Rabbi Yehuda. <ref>Eruvin 45a</ref> | |||
==== Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel ==== | |||
# The Rif does not accept the rule of following Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel's positions mentioned in Mishnayot unless it's very logical, but the Rosh does regardless.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 12)</ref> | |||
# | |||
== | ==== Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi ==== | ||
# The Halacha follows Rabbi Yehuda HaNassi, colloquially known as "Rebbi," against another Tanna, but not against a group of them.<ref>Eruvin 46b</ref> | |||
# The Rif and Rosh point out that this is not true when Rebbi disagrees with his father, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 11)</ref> | |||
=== Amoraim === | |||
# Amoraim often elucidate the shitot of Tannaim in Mishnayot even if the Halacha doesn't follow them, so there's no proof to be brought from the fact that the view of a certain Tanna in a Mishnah is elucidated to prove which the Halacha should follow. However, proof may be brought from such an instance with respect to a Tanna in a Baraita or another Amora.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 13). See Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 23, 355) who seems to disagree about elucidating against one's own position.</ref> | |||
# It's usually assumed that Amoraim cannot argue on Tannaim,<ref>Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Mamrim 2:1), Klalei HaGemara on Halichot Olam (2:2:10), Chazon Ish (Kovetz Iggerot vol. 2 Iggeret 24, Orchot Ish page 186)</ref> but some say it's merely an honorary non Halachic distinction.<ref>Biur HaGra (Choshen Mishpat 25:6), See Tosafot (Ketubot 8a s.v. Rav Tanna Hu uPalig) and Kovetz Shiurim (Bava Batra 633) who says similarly in the name of Reb Chaim Soloveitchik. [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/891586/rabbi-hershel-schachter/berachos-54-23b-24a-sitting-next-to-tefillin-amoraim-vs-tannaim-libo-roeh-es-haervah-hafrashas-terumah-mitzvah-or-mattir-ervas-tinok-and-akum/ Rav Hershel Schachter] takes this stance, as well. Rav Elchanan Wasserman also engaged the Chazon Ish in correspondence on this issue, after he wrote in Kuntress Divrei Sofrim (Siman 2, see Da'at Sofrim ad loc) that Chatimat HaMishnah and HaTalmud were enabled by the gathering of all the Chachmei HaDor (Kibutz Chachamim), which gave them the status of Beit Din HaGadol. The latter took an opposing view, as it discounted the inherent loftiness of the individual Chachamim and implied there was little different between them and later generations. (Kovetz Iggerot ibid). [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlIjFgOCG1s Rav Asher Weiss] finds grounding for Reb Chaim in the Meiri, but he believes that given the Rambam says one cannot disagree without confidently understanding the difficult opinion at hand, there are just some generations that were so far from the previous one that a line must be drawn. See also [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/873470/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/intergenerational-debate-r-asher-weiss-on-disagreements-between-tannaim-amoraim-rishonim-acharonim/ Rav Aryeh Lebowitz's shiur] on the topic.</ref> | |||
==== Rav and Shmuel ==== | |||
# When Rav and Shmuel debate, the Halacha follows Rav in ritual law ([[Issur veHetter]]) and Shmuel in monetary matters ([[Dinei Mammonot]]).<ref>Menachot 41b</ref> | |||
# According to the [[Rosh]], this is true only if the majority of Amoraim don't side with either Rav or Shmuel, in which case, we would just follow the majority, while Tosafot believe it to be true in any case.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 16)</ref> | |||
# | # If Shmuel himself elucidates the Mishnah according to Rav's position in a case of monetary matters, then the Halacha follows Rav even in that case.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 14)</ref> | ||
# If a later Amora elucidates Shmuel's opinion in a matter of Issur veHetter, the [[Rif]] takes it to mean we pasken like Shmuel, while the [[Rosh]] argues that there's no proof. It's normal for later Amoraim to elucidate the words of earlier ones, so it's not a test for whose position is accepted.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 17)</ref> | |||
# | |||
== | ==== Rav and Rabbi Yochanan ==== | ||
# Rav vs. Rabbi Yochanan, the Halacha follows Rabbi Yochanan.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 556)</ref> | |||
# According to the [[Rif]], this rule only applies with Rabbi Yochanan only disputes Rav's position, but if he's disputing both Rav and Shmuel, then the Halacha follows Rav and Shmuel, whereas the [[Rosh]] rules that the rule is true in any case.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 15), Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 556)</ref> | |||
# | ==== Double Machaloket ==== | ||
# When Rav Yochanan and Resh Lakish dispute Rami Bar Chammah and Rav Yirmiyah, the Halacha follows the former group.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 301)</ref> | |||
=== | ==== Maaseh Rav ==== | ||
== | # The [[Rif]] follows a Stam Mishnah over a Maaseh Rav, while the [[Rosh]] argues the Halacha follows a Maaseh Rav over Klalim like Stam Mishnah, R' Yochanan vs. Rav, and Halacha keRabban Shimon Ben Gamliel BeMishnatenu.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 8)</ref> | ||
==== Hilcheta KeVatrai ==== | |||
# The [[Rambam]] rules like the later Amora even if the earlier one's are the majority.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 169)</ref> | |||
====Hilcheta KeVatrai==== | |||
#The [[Rambam]] rules like the later Amora even if the earlier one's are the majority.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 169)</ref> | |||
==Further Reading== | ==Further Reading== | ||
# Mevo HaTalmud attributed to Rav Shmuel HaNaggid with the Kitzur Klalei HaTalmud commentary | |||
#Mevo HaTalmud attributed to Rav Shmuel HaNaggid with the Kitzur Klalei HaTalmud commentary | # [https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/הליכות_עולם_(כללים) Halichot Olam] with commentaries Klalei HaGemara by Rav Yosef Karo and Yavin Shmua by Rav Shlomo Algazi | ||
#[https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/הליכות_עולם_(כללים) Halichot Olam] with commentaries Klalei HaGemara by Rav Yosef Karo and Yavin Shmua by Rav Shlomo Algazi | # Kenesset HaGedolah (Klalei HaTalmud) | ||
#Kenesset HaGedolah (Klalei HaTalmud) | # Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud) | ||
#Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud) | # [https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/ספר_הכריתות Sefer HaKeritut] | ||
#[https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/ספר_הכריתות Sefer HaKeritut] | # Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 Seder Tannaim veAmoraim | ||
#Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 Seder Tannaim veAmoraim | # Mevo HaTalmud by Maharitz Chayus | ||
#Mevo HaTalmud by Maharitz Chayus | # [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/56802 Ein Yitzchak vol. 1], by Rav Yitzchak Yosef | ||
#[http://www.hebrewbooks.org/56802 Ein Yitzchak vol. 1], by Rav Yitzchak Yosef | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | {{Reflist|30em}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Klalim]] | ||
Revision as of 16:42, 14 June 2018
Overview
The Talmud is laden with extrapolations of the Torah and controversies between Tannaim and Amoraim. In order to understand the mechanisms at play and the means of deciding a Machaloket, it's incumbent to study the rules. Some are explicit in the Gemara, but their applications can get tricky, especially when competing with other rules and considerations. Over the centuries, various works, such as Mevo HaTalmud, Halichot Olam, and their commentaries were compiled summarizing the rules and weighing them against one another. Often, their discussions consist of a deluge of citations proving or disproving a point by referencing sugyot spanning the entire corpus of Talmudic literature. Though adding all of those citations to this page would be heplful, thanks to the Sefaria plugin, due to the tediousness of the endeavor, as a minimum, we will suffice by quoting the Klalim Sefer at hand and leave it to the reader to do the rest of the groundwork. Most of these Sefarim are readily available and portions of many of them are printed in the back of the standard Masechet Berachot.[1]
Talmudic Praseology
- Sometimes, the Gemara will use the same phrase in different places but refer to totally different concepts, while, other times, it will use different phrases in different places to refer to the same concept.[2]
Deciding Machloket
The Gemara provides a few examples and general guidelines about how to decide debates between individuals mentioned in Shas.
Tannaim
Talmidei Rabbi Akiva (R' Meir, R' Yehudah, R' Shimon, and R' Yose)
- Rabbi Meir vs. Rabbi Yehuda, the Halacha follows Rabbi Yehuda. [3]
Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel
- The Rif does not accept the rule of following Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel's positions mentioned in Mishnayot unless it's very logical, but the Rosh does regardless.[4]
Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi
- The Halacha follows Rabbi Yehuda HaNassi, colloquially known as "Rebbi," against another Tanna, but not against a group of them.[5]
- The Rif and Rosh point out that this is not true when Rebbi disagrees with his father, Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel.[6]
Amoraim
- Amoraim often elucidate the shitot of Tannaim in Mishnayot even if the Halacha doesn't follow them, so there's no proof to be brought from the fact that the view of a certain Tanna in a Mishnah is elucidated to prove which the Halacha should follow. However, proof may be brought from such an instance with respect to a Tanna in a Baraita or another Amora.[7]
- It's usually assumed that Amoraim cannot argue on Tannaim,[8] but some say it's merely an honorary non Halachic distinction.[9]
Rav and Shmuel
- When Rav and Shmuel debate, the Halacha follows Rav in ritual law (Issur veHetter) and Shmuel in monetary matters (Dinei Mammonot).[10]
- According to the Rosh, this is true only if the majority of Amoraim don't side with either Rav or Shmuel, in which case, we would just follow the majority, while Tosafot believe it to be true in any case.[11]
- If Shmuel himself elucidates the Mishnah according to Rav's position in a case of monetary matters, then the Halacha follows Rav even in that case.[12]
- If a later Amora elucidates Shmuel's opinion in a matter of Issur veHetter, the Rif takes it to mean we pasken like Shmuel, while the Rosh argues that there's no proof. It's normal for later Amoraim to elucidate the words of earlier ones, so it's not a test for whose position is accepted.[13]
Rav and Rabbi Yochanan
- Rav vs. Rabbi Yochanan, the Halacha follows Rabbi Yochanan.[14]
- According to the Rif, this rule only applies with Rabbi Yochanan only disputes Rav's position, but if he's disputing both Rav and Shmuel, then the Halacha follows Rav and Shmuel, whereas the Rosh rules that the rule is true in any case.[15]
Double Machaloket
- When Rav Yochanan and Resh Lakish dispute Rami Bar Chammah and Rav Yirmiyah, the Halacha follows the former group.[16]
Maaseh Rav
- The Rif follows a Stam Mishnah over a Maaseh Rav, while the Rosh argues the Halacha follows a Maaseh Rav over Klalim like Stam Mishnah, R' Yochanan vs. Rav, and Halacha keRabban Shimon Ben Gamliel BeMishnatenu.[17]
Hilcheta KeVatrai
Further Reading
- Mevo HaTalmud attributed to Rav Shmuel HaNaggid with the Kitzur Klalei HaTalmud commentary
- Halichot Olam with commentaries Klalei HaGemara by Rav Yosef Karo and Yavin Shmua by Rav Shlomo Algazi
- Kenesset HaGedolah (Klalei HaTalmud)
- Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud)
- Sefer HaKeritut
- Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 Seder Tannaim veAmoraim
- Mevo HaTalmud by Maharitz Chayus
- Ein Yitzchak vol. 1, by Rav Yitzchak Yosef
Sources
- ↑ As an aside, Rav Hershel Schachter (Sanhedrin 5775 #73) is of the opinion that Klalim are postscriptive, not prescriptive, meaning the later generations voted on each issue and the results indicated that in certain situations a specific Tanna's position was usually followed. Thus they established the Klal as a Siman, not a Sibah, for deciding a Machaloket, but, of course, there are exceptions. This is just the general rule. This position is based on the writings of Rav Elazar Meir Preil in HaMaor (vol. 1 Shu"t Siman 78:6)
- ↑ Numerous Rishonim cited in Halichot Olam 3:8, Yad Malachi Klalei HaTalmud 374
- ↑ Eruvin 45a
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 12)
- ↑ Eruvin 46b
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 11)
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 13). See Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 23, 355) who seems to disagree about elucidating against one's own position.
- ↑ Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Mamrim 2:1), Klalei HaGemara on Halichot Olam (2:2:10), Chazon Ish (Kovetz Iggerot vol. 2 Iggeret 24, Orchot Ish page 186)
- ↑ Biur HaGra (Choshen Mishpat 25:6), See Tosafot (Ketubot 8a s.v. Rav Tanna Hu uPalig) and Kovetz Shiurim (Bava Batra 633) who says similarly in the name of Reb Chaim Soloveitchik. Rav Hershel Schachter takes this stance, as well. Rav Elchanan Wasserman also engaged the Chazon Ish in correspondence on this issue, after he wrote in Kuntress Divrei Sofrim (Siman 2, see Da'at Sofrim ad loc) that Chatimat HaMishnah and HaTalmud were enabled by the gathering of all the Chachmei HaDor (Kibutz Chachamim), which gave them the status of Beit Din HaGadol. The latter took an opposing view, as it discounted the inherent loftiness of the individual Chachamim and implied there was little different between them and later generations. (Kovetz Iggerot ibid). Rav Asher Weiss finds grounding for Reb Chaim in the Meiri, but he believes that given the Rambam says one cannot disagree without confidently understanding the difficult opinion at hand, there are just some generations that were so far from the previous one that a line must be drawn. See also Rav Aryeh Lebowitz's shiur on the topic.
- ↑ Menachot 41b
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 16)
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 14)
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 17)
- ↑ Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 556)
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 15), Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 556)
- ↑ Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 301)
- ↑ Korban Netanel (Klalim 8)
- ↑ Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 169)