16,374
edits
Where Is It Permissible to Recite Brachot?: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
Where Is It Permissible to Recite Brachot? (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, 5 January 2018
, 5 January 2018→Learning or Thinking Torah in Unclean Areas
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
# If there is feces on one's body, one may not involve oneself in Divrei [[Kedusha]] even if it is covered.<ref>Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 5:3</ref> | # If there is feces on one's body, one may not involve oneself in Divrei [[Kedusha]] even if it is covered.<ref>Kitzur Shulchan Aruch 5:3</ref> | ||
# If a baby soiled a diaper but they are still wearing it if you don't smell it the feces are considered covered and it is permitted to learn or make brachot nearby.<ref>[http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/891935/rabbi-hershel-schachter/berachos-56-25ab-modern-bathrooms-tzoah-libo-roeh-es-haervah-glass-akum-issur-chal-al-issur/ Rav Hershel Schachter (Brachot Shiur 56 around min 85)]</ref> | # If a baby soiled a diaper but they are still wearing it if you don't smell it the feces are considered covered and it is permitted to learn or make brachot nearby.<ref>[http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/891935/rabbi-hershel-schachter/berachos-56-25ab-modern-bathrooms-tzoah-libo-roeh-es-haervah-glass-akum-issur-chal-al-issur/ Rav Hershel Schachter (Brachot Shiur 56 around min 85)]</ref> | ||
===In Front of an Unclad Person=== | |||
# If an area of one [[Tefach]] on a part of a woman's body that is usually covered is exposed, including a married woman's hair, it is considered nakedness regarding which it is forbidden to involve oneself in Divrei Kedusha.<ref>Shulchan Aruch 75:1</ref> Areas that may be exposed (unless there is a local custom to be more strict) are the face, hands, and legs up to the knee.<ref>Mishna Brurah 75:2</ref> | |||
# If one is facing such a woman, according to Sephardim, he may close his eyes or turn his head, in order to recite a [[bracha]].<ref>Shulchan Aruch 75:6, Mishna Brurah 75:29, Yechave Daat 2:5</ref> According to some Ashkenazim, he must turn all the way around.<ref>Mishna Brurah 75:29</ref> Other Ashkenazic poskim hold that turning around is only necessary when one is facing the actual Ervah (unlike areas which are only covered because of local practice, such as forearms and forelegs) of a woman, but in the case of a [[Tefach]] of skin or hair, closing one's eyes or turning his head is sufficient. <ref>Mishna Brurah 75:1</ref> Regarding learning Torah, Ashkenazim are lenient to allow learning if one closes one's eyes or turns away one's face.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Byitzchak Yikra 84:1 cited by Dirshu 75:1) explained that learning Torah is less severe than davening and it is permitted to rely on the Rambam that closing one's eyes is sufficient.</ref> | |||
# If one sees an image of an improperly dressed woman on television, even though she herself is not physically present, he may not make a [[bracha]] while looking at her and must follow the above protocol.<ref>Yechave Daat 4:7 writes that she does not physically have to be present, because the whole prohibition is in place to prevent one from having inappropriate thoughts, which are all too possible when watching an improperly dressed woman on TV. Of course, one must be wary, as to bringing TV into ones home in the first place, which exposes one's children to a great variety of inappropriate content and inhibits their ability to grow as good wholesome Jewish children. </ref> | |||
===If One is Improperly Dressed=== | |||
# If there's no separation between one's heart and one's nakedness one may not recite a bracha or learn Torah.<ref>The Gemara Brachot 25b cites a dispute if a person's heart "sees" his nakedness whether he may recite Kriyat Shema. Tosfot s.v. vehari writes the while Rabbenu Shemaya held that it was permitted the Ri disagreed. Rif Brachot 16b, Rambam Kriyat Shema 2:7, and Rosh 3:50 hold like the Ri that it is forbidden to say Kriyat Shema in such a state. Shulchan Aruch 74:2 codifies that opinion.</ref> | |||
# If a person is standing in water unclothed with his head out of the water he needs to create a separation between his heart and his nakedness in order to recite a bracha. This can be accomplished by covering one's private area with a towel. Alternatively, if one wraps one's arms around one's chest and heart that can serve as a barrier between one's private area and one's heart. Yet merely using one's hand to cover one's chest doesn't serve as a barrier between one's heart and one's nakedness. Lastly, kicking up the water is effective only if the floor is a dirt floor but if it is tiled and the water is clear kicking up the water doesn't suffice.<ref>Rabbenu Yonah 16b s.v. aval explains that there are two issues with making a bracha unclothed; one is that one's eyes can't be in view of ervah and the second is that one's heart can't be in view of one's ervah. However, since one's nakedness is underwater and one's eyes aren't, the ervah is considered in a different domain from one's eyes. Yet, the issue of his heart seeing the ervah continues to exist. That is solved by kicking up the water so that the water is murky, by covering one's ervah with a towel, or by pressing one's a arms against one's chest to create a barrier between the heart and ervah. Shulchan Aruch 74:2 holds that holding one's hands against one's chest isn't a solution for creating one's heart seeing one's ervah, but wrapping one's arms around one's chest is sufficient. Mishna Brurah 73:13 explains that one's hands can cover one's heart because one's own body doesn't count as a covering but wrapping one's arms around one's chest which is an abnormal way to hold oneself it is a sufficient barrier. Mishna Brurah 74:11 quotes the Magen Avraham who holds that kicking up the water is a solution as the Gemara Brachot 25b describes only if there is dirt on the floor and kicking up the water and dirt will make the water unclear but if the water is clear and floor is tiled then kicking up water doesn't help. However, the Mishna Brurah concludes by citing the Or Zaruah that it is effective to kick up the water even if the water is clear and the floor is tiled. Aruch Hashulchan 74:12 holds like the Magen Avraham. </ref> | |||
# Some say that there's no issue for a woman regarding the issue of her heart seeing her nakedness. Therefore, a woman would be allowed to recite a bracha while in the mikveh with their private area underwater and head out of the water.<ref>Shulchan Aruch 74:4. Shach YD 200:1 writes that the minhag follows this opinion.</ref> | |||
# If someone is standing with just their private part in the water while their heart and head are out of the water one can recite a bracha. One should be careful that one's eyes don't see one's erveh while one is reciting the bracha.<ref>Rama 74:2 writes that since the water serves as a barrier between one's private area and one's heart or eyes if one only has one's private area in the water with one's heart and head out one could recite a bracha even if the water is clear. Pri Chadash 74:2 argues vehemently that this isn't a solution if the water is clear. Mishna Brurah 74:13 and Aruch Hashulchan 74:12 accept the Rama. Mishna Brurah just adds that obviously one may not look at one's ervah while reciting the bracha.</ref> | |||
===Definition of Divrei Kedusha=== | ===Definition of Divrei Kedusha=== | ||
# For the purposes of learning or reciting anything of Kedusha before Ervah, in a bathroom or near feces, this includes Kriyat Shema, Tefillah, learning Torah, brachot, or anything of kedusha.<ref>Mishna Brurah 76:2 writes that it is obvious that for all purposes of saying Torah in a place of Ervah, bathroom, or feces it is equally applicable whether it is learning Torah, reciting Shema, Tefillah, or anything of Kedusha. Aruch Hashulchan 76:1 adds brachot as another example. Regarding not saying Torah in a bathroom, the Rambam (Kriyat Shema 3:4) writes that Kriyat Shema is the same as any other divrei kedusha and even thinking Torah in a bathroom is forbidden. He says the same for a place that is unclean because of feces or urine. | # For the purposes of learning or reciting anything of Kedusha before Ervah, in a bathroom or near feces, this includes Kriyat Shema, Tefillah, learning Torah, brachot, or anything of kedusha.<ref>Mishna Brurah 76:2 writes that it is obvious that for all purposes of saying Torah in a place of Ervah, bathroom, or feces it is equally applicable whether it is learning Torah, reciting Shema, Tefillah, or anything of Kedusha. Aruch Hashulchan 76:1 adds brachot as another example. Regarding not saying Torah in a bathroom, the Rambam (Kriyat Shema 3:4) writes that Kriyat Shema is the same as any other divrei kedusha and even thinking Torah in a bathroom is forbidden. He says the same for a place that is unclean because of feces or urine. | ||
* However, the Tosfot (Eruvin 64a s.v. shikor) and Rosh Eruvin 6:5 have a doubt whether reciting Brachot are treated like davening Tefillah near feces after the fact. The Ramban (Brachot 22b) clarifies that Tosfot never even considered if it is permitted to recite a bracha near feces. That is obviously forbidden. In fact, any Torah, bracha, tefillah, shema, or concept of Torah ("Inyan Shel Torah") is forbidden Biblically as the Torah says "והיה מחניך קדש" and doesn't specify Shema or Tefillah, so obviously it also applies to brachot. Rather Tosfot was in doubt regarding after the fact if the bracha in a dirty counts or needs to be said again. Even on that point, the Ramban writes that it is clear that one doesn't fulfill one's obligation even after the fact and there's no distinction between brachot and any other Torah. The only distinction that is relevant is that it is forbidden to recite shema near someone who passed gas but permitted to learn Torah. The Ramban writes that this is only because learning near passed gas is only rabbinic and chazal didn't want their enactment to cause people not to learn Torah but it would be forbidden to recite brachot or say shema near the gas. He concludes with the Yerushalmi Trumot 6:1 that it is forbidden to recite brachot near ervah. The Shulchan Aruch 185:5 cites the Tosfot but the Mishna Brurah 185:7 cites the Ramban.</ref> | * However, the Tosfot (Eruvin 64a s.v. shikor) and Rosh Eruvin 6:5 have a doubt whether reciting Brachot are treated like davening Tefillah near feces after the fact. The Ramban (Brachot 22b) clarifies that Tosfot never even considered if it is permitted to recite a bracha near feces. That is obviously forbidden. In fact, any Torah, bracha, tefillah, shema, or concept of Torah ("Inyan Shel Torah") is forbidden Biblically as the Torah says "והיה מחניך קדש" and doesn't specify Shema or Tefillah, so obviously it also applies to brachot. Rather Tosfot was in doubt regarding after the fact if the bracha in a dirty counts or needs to be said again. Even on that point, the Ramban writes that it is clear that one doesn't fulfill one's obligation even after the fact and there's no distinction between brachot and any other Torah. The only distinction that is relevant is that it is forbidden to recite shema near someone who passed gas but permitted to learn Torah. The Ramban writes that this is only because learning near passed gas is only rabbinic and chazal didn't want their enactment to cause people not to learn Torah but it would be forbidden to recite brachot or say shema near the gas. He concludes with the Yerushalmi Trumot 6:1 that it is forbidden to recite brachot near ervah. The Shulchan Aruch 185:5 cites the Tosfot but the Mishna Brurah 185:7 cites the Ramban.</ref> | ||
# It is equally forbidden whether it is in Hebrew or any other language.<ref>Mishna Burrah 76:2</ref> | # It is equally forbidden whether it is in Hebrew or any other language.<ref>Mishna Burrah 76:2</ref> | ||
==Saying Hashem's Name In Vain== | ==Saying Hashem's Name In Vain== | ||
