Transferring Taste: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Factors to Accept Cham Miksato
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* Chanan in kelim (YD 98:4). This dispute does not affect the dispute regarding chanan in kelim. The above dispute is regarding where the transfer of the taste exists, while chanan in kelim effects the other tastes absorbed in the walls becoming forbidden and becoming necessary to nullify.</ref> This assumes that the utensil isn't completely hot and this isn't dry heat absorption. See next section for that halacha. | * Chanan in kelim (YD 98:4). This dispute does not affect the dispute regarding chanan in kelim. The above dispute is regarding where the transfer of the taste exists, while chanan in kelim effects the other tastes absorbed in the walls becoming forbidden and becoming necessary to nullify.</ref> This assumes that the utensil isn't completely hot and this isn't dry heat absorption. See next section for that halacha. | ||
===Factors to Accept Cham Miksato=== | ===Factors to Accept Cham Miksato=== | ||
#If the entire kli is actually hot then the tastes from the food travel throughout the pot even the part that isn't being used.<ref> Badei Hashulchan 94:9, 14 based on based on Pri Megadim M"Z 94:1 s.v. heneh, Shach 69:64, Chavot Daat, Rabbi Akiva Eiger (OC MA 451:24). Chachmat Adam disagrees. Isur Vheter 57:61 seems to be lenient.</ref> | #If the entire kli is actually hot then the tastes from the food travel throughout the pot even the part that isn't being used.<ref> Badei Hashulchan 94:9, 14 based on based on Pri Megadim M"Z 94:1 s.v. heneh, Shach 69:64, Chavot Daat, Rabbi Akiva Eiger (OC MA 451:24), Zivchei Tzedek 94:11. Chachmat Adam disagrees. Isur Vheter 57:61 seems to be lenient.</ref> | ||
# If the heat was dry heat i.e. it wasn't cooking, such as roasting, then it spreads throughout the kli.<ref> Isur Vheter 37:2, 57:61, Shach 121:17, Gra 94:6, and Badei Hashulchan 94:15</ref> | # If the heat was dry heat i.e. it wasn't cooking, such as roasting, then it spreads throughout the kli.<ref> Isur Vheter 37:2, 57:61, Shach 121:17, Gra 94:6, and Badei Hashulchan 94:15</ref> | ||
# Some poskim hold that a spoon that was used to mix a hot pot is considered to absorb taste up to the point that the spoon entered into the pot and not just up to the point that it entered into the food. The reason for this opinion is that the spoon can absorb taste up while it is in the pot from the ''[[zeyia]]'' of the hot food even though it is an open pot.<ref>Peleti 94:1, Pri Chadash 121:15, Chavot Daat 94:1. Pri Megadim MZ 94:1 s.v. vda cites this from the Pri Chadash 121:15 and Bet Lechem Yehuda 11.</ref> Most | # Some poskim hold that a spoon that was used to mix a hot pot is considered to absorb taste up to the point that the spoon entered into the pot and not just up to the point that it entered into the food. The reason for this opinion is that the spoon can absorb taste up while it is in the pot from the ''[[zeyia]]'' of the hot food even though it is an open pot.<ref>Peleti 94:1, Pri Chadash 121:15, Chavot Daat 94:1. Pri Megadim MZ 94:1 s.v. vda cites this from the Pri Chadash 121:15 and Bet Lechem Yehuda 11.</ref> Most opinions are lenient.<ref>Chachmat Adam 46:6, Badei Hashulchan 94:4 citing Chatom Sofer 82 and Yad Yehuda. Zivchei Tzedek 121:29 cites the Pri Chadash but in 94:10 he cites the dispute and writes that the primary opinion is that of the Chachmat Adam.</ref> | ||
# Some distinguish between whether the absorption was isura baala or hetera baala and hold that we don't say ''cham miksato'' when it was hetera baala.<ref>Rashba in Mishmeret Habayit 4:4 37b, Shach 121:16, Zivchei Tzedek 121:28</ref> | |||
===Partial Hechsher=== | ===Partial Hechsher=== | ||
