Tosafot: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m
Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim"
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (→Authorship: rosh) |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
# The Tosafot commentary on most of the Masechtot studied originates with the Tosafot compiled by the [[Rash MiShantz]], a compilation known as the [[Tosafot Shantz]]. However, our version was abridged by R' Elazar Tukh, whose redaction is known as the Tosafot Tukh and whose goal was to elucidate the give and take of the Gemara, not decide Halacha. Nevertheless, we follow the Tosafot Tukh over the Tosafot Shantz, because the Tosafot Tukh came later.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 14), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19). For more on the redaction of the Tosafot we have today, see Rabbi Ephraim Kanarfogel's The Intellectual History and Rabbinic Culture of Medieval Ashkenaz (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2012),[http://www.hakirah.org/Vol15Leibowitz.pdf "The Emergence and Development of Tosafot on the Talmud" (Hakira vol. 15 page 143)], [http://www.hakirah.org/Vol18Leibowitz.pdf "Redacting Tosafot on the Talmud: Part I―Sources" (Hakira vol. 18 page 235)],[http://www.hakirah.org/Vol20Leibowitz.pdf "Part II―Editing Methods" (Hakira vol. 20 page 191)], and Tosafot Tukh on the Talmud: A Critical Analysis of R. Eliezer of Tukh's Tosafot Redaction and Marginalia by Rabbi Dr. Aryeh Leibowitz</ref>. In fact, some say that we should follow the Tosafot on the more major masechtot, such as Yevamot, over the Tosafot on smaller Masechtot, because the former are from the Tosafot Tukh.<ref>Yam Shel Shlomo (Yevamot 4:34), Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 22), Birkei Yosef (Orach Chaim 25)</ref> The Tosafot commentary on Chullin is also Tosafot Tukh. | # The Tosafot commentary on most of the Masechtot studied originates with the Tosafot compiled by the [[Rash MiShantz]], a compilation known as the [[Tosafot Shantz]]. However, our version was abridged by R' Elazar Tukh, whose redaction is known as the Tosafot Tukh and whose goal was to elucidate the give and take of the Gemara, not decide Halacha. Nevertheless, we follow the Tosafot Tukh over the Tosafot Shantz, because the Tosafot Tukh came later.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 14), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19). For more on the redaction of the Tosafot we have today, see Rabbi Ephraim Kanarfogel's The Intellectual History and Rabbinic Culture of Medieval Ashkenaz (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2012),[http://www.hakirah.org/Vol15Leibowitz.pdf "The Emergence and Development of Tosafot on the Talmud" (Hakira vol. 15 page 143)], [http://www.hakirah.org/Vol18Leibowitz.pdf "Redacting Tosafot on the Talmud: Part I―Sources" (Hakira vol. 18 page 235)],[http://www.hakirah.org/Vol20Leibowitz.pdf "Part II―Editing Methods" (Hakira vol. 20 page 191)], and Tosafot Tukh on the Talmud: A Critical Analysis of R. Eliezer of Tukh's Tosafot Redaction and Marginalia by Rabbi Dr. Aryeh Leibowitz</ref>. In fact, some say that we should follow the Tosafot on the more major masechtot, such as Yevamot, over the Tosafot on smaller Masechtot, because the former are from the Tosafot Tukh.<ref>Yam Shel Shlomo (Yevamot 4:34), Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 22), Birkei Yosef (Orach Chaim 25)</ref> The Tosafot commentary on Chullin is also Tosafot Tukh. | ||
# The Tosafot commentary to Yoma comes from the [[Maharam Rutenberg]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 17), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19)</ref> | # The Tosafot commentary to Yoma comes from the [[Maharam Rutenberg]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Tosafot 17), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19)</ref> | ||
# The Piskei Tosafot printed at the end of each Masechet is not always based on the set of Tosafot printed on the page. As such, there are sometimes ideas that appear there but do not appear in the Tosafot. The authorship of this digest is subject to discussion.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Peh 120)</ref> | # The Piskei Tosafot printed at the end of each Masechet is not always based on the set of Tosafot printed on the page. As such, there are sometimes ideas that appear there but do not appear in the Tosafot. The authorship of this digest is subject to discussion.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Peh 120). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 9:8), discussed in Yabia Omer (vol. 2 Yoreh Deah 21:4) parenthetically.</ref> | ||
# Other sets of Tosafots include<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19) and Menachem Tzion ad loc.</ref> | # Other sets of Tosafots include<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 19) and Menachem Tzion ad loc.</ref> | ||
## Tosafot Rabbeinu Elchanan | ## Tosafot Rabbeinu Elchanan | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
## Tosafot Rav Yisrael | ## Tosafot Rav Yisrael | ||
## Tosafot Rabbeinu Meir | ## Tosafot Rabbeinu Meir | ||
## Tosafot | ## Tosafot Sephardiot | ||
## Tosafot Rabbeinu Peretz, whose commentary is the one on the page in Masechtot Avodah Zarah, Meilah, and Nazir. Hi Talmidim also produced a set on Masechet Bava Kamma. | ## Tosafot Rabbeinu Peretz, whose commentary is the one on the page in Masechtot Avodah Zarah, Meilah, and Nazir. Hi Talmidim also produced a set on Masechet Bava Kamma. | ||
## [[Tosafot Rid]] | ## [[Tosafot Rid]] | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
=Sources= | =Sources= | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | {{Reflist|30em}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Klalei Haposkim]] | ||
