Tashlumin: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→General rules
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# If one forgot to say [[Arvit]] one should say [[Shacharit]] twice, the first for [[Shacharit]], the second as a makeup (Tashlumin) of [[Arvit]]. <Ref>S”A 108:2 based on the Gemara [[Brachot]] 26a </ref> | # If one forgot to say [[Arvit]] one should say [[Shacharit]] twice, the first for [[Shacharit]], the second as a makeup (Tashlumin) of [[Arvit]]. <Ref>S”A 108:2 based on the Gemara [[Brachot]] 26a </ref> | ||
# If someone was involved in a mitzvah from the beginning to the end of the time of a Tefillah he was exempt from that Tefillah then he doesn't need to recite Tashlumin afterwards.<ref>The Derisha YD 341:3 writes that someone who was Osek in a Mitzvah is exempt from Tefillah and if he missed a Tefillah because of the mitzvah he doesn't have any tashlumin just like an Onen. The Taz YD 341:5 disagrees saying that missing a Tefillah because of a mitzvah is just like an other extenuating circumstance for which you missed a tefillah which would obligate a Tashlumin. The Nekudat Hakesef 341 agrees with the Derisha. Mishna Brurah 93:8 rules like the Derisha. Steipler in Kehilat Yakov Brachot ch. 15 explains that the Derisha holds that when one is dealing with a mitzvah there's a complete exemption from the mitzvah so that it was like you weren't obligated and as such there is no tashlumin, however, the Taz holds that the exemption is just like something that prevents you from a mitzvah and as such there is a tashlumin. He compares this to the dispute between Tosfot and Ran whether someone doing a mitzvah can involve himself in a second mitzvah that he can do simultaneously. </ref> | # If someone was involved in a mitzvah from the beginning to the end of the time of a Tefillah he was exempt from that Tefillah then he doesn't need to recite Tashlumin afterwards.<ref>The Derisha YD 341:3 writes that someone who was Osek in a Mitzvah is exempt from Tefillah and if he missed a Tefillah because of the mitzvah he doesn't have any tashlumin just like an Onen. The Taz YD 341:5 disagrees saying that missing a Tefillah because of a mitzvah is just like an other extenuating circumstance for which you missed a tefillah which would obligate a Tashlumin. The Nekudat Hakesef 341 agrees with the Derisha. Mishna Brurah 93:8 rules like the Derisha. Steipler in Kehilat Yakov Brachot ch. 15 explains that the Derisha holds that when one is dealing with a mitzvah there's a complete exemption from the mitzvah so that it was like you weren't obligated and as such there is no tashlumin, however, the Taz holds that the exemption is just like something that prevents you from a mitzvah and as such there is a tashlumin. He compares this to the dispute between Tosfot and Ran whether someone doing a mitzvah can involve himself in a second mitzvah that he can do simultaneously. </ref> | ||
# For example, someone who is a doctor healing a Jewish patient and missed the entire period of a Tefillah from beginning to end, since he was dealing with a mitzvah he doesn't need to recite Tashlumin afterwards.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach cited in Nishmat Avraham 38:6 writes that someone who is healing a Jewish patient is doing a mitzvah and as such he is exempt from Tefillah and if he's involved with that mitzvah from the beginning of the time of the Tefillah to the end then he doesn't even need to recite Tashlumin in accordance with the Derisha YD 341:3. He also cites Rav Zilberstein who explains that even if he doesn't have intention for a mitzvah nonetheless he is practically doing the mitzvah of Hashavat Aveidah and as such the exemption applies.</ref> | # For example, someone who is a doctor healing a Jewish patient and missed the entire period of a Tefillah from beginning to end, since he was dealing with a mitzvah he doesn't need to recite Tashlumin afterwards.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach cited in Nishmat Avraham 38:6 writes that someone who is healing a Jewish patient is doing a mitzvah and as such he is exempt from Tefillah and if he's involved with that mitzvah from the beginning of the time of the Tefillah to the end then he doesn't even need to recite Tashlumin in accordance with the Derisha YD 341:3. He also cites Rav Zilberstein who explains that even if he doesn't have intention for a mitzvah nonetheless he is practically doing the mitzvah of Hashavat Aveidah and as such the exemption applies. Minchat Asher 1:121 agrees that if the doctor was involved in pikuach nefesh the entire time of the tefillah he was exempt and he doesn't have to daven tashlumin. However, a doctor in the office seeing patients isn't considered osek bmitzvah because primarily he is doing his job to be paid. </ref> | ||
==Procedure of Tashlumin== | ==Procedure of Tashlumin== | ||
