16,374
edits
Tashlumin: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m
Text replace - " D(.*)H " to " s.v. "
m (Text replace - "Biur Halacha" to "Beiur Halacha") |
m (Text replace - " D(.*)H " to " s.v. ") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Having intent to specify the second as Tashlumin== | ==Having intent to specify the second as Tashlumin== | ||
# Preferably, one should have intent to specify the first one to be for the current [[Tefillah]] and the second as the makeup (Tashlumin) of the previous [[Tefillah]]. | # Preferably, one should have intent to specify the first one to be for the current [[Tefillah]] and the second as the makeup (Tashlumin) of the previous [[Tefillah]]. | ||
# If one had no specific intent when praying the two [[Shemoneh Esrei]]s one fulfills one’s obligation. <ref>Beiur Halacha 108:1 | # If one had no specific intent when praying the two [[Shemoneh Esrei]]s one fulfills one’s obligation. <ref>Beiur Halacha 108:1 s.v. VeIm Hiyfech, Kaf HaChaim 108:3, Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 108:1) </ref> | ||
# If one mistakenly had intent that the first one would be Tashlumin and the second for current [[Tefillah]] one didn’t fulfill one’s obligation with the Tashlumin. However, some say that one should stipulate that if one isn’t obligated that one is praying a voluntary [[prayer]]. <Ref> | # If one mistakenly had intent that the first one would be Tashlumin and the second for current [[Tefillah]] one didn’t fulfill one’s obligation with the Tashlumin. However, some say that one should stipulate that if one isn’t obligated that one is praying a voluntary [[prayer]]. <Ref> | ||
* The halacha that the first one is supposed to be [[Mincha]] and the second Tashlumin for [[Shacharit]] is based on the Briatta on the top of [[Brachot]] 26b which says that if one forgot to say [[Mincha]] of [[Shabbat]] one should say [[Arvit]] on Motzei [[Shabbat]] twice the first one with [[Havdalah]] ([[Atta Chonatanu]]) and the second without [[Havdalah]] and if one switched the order one has not fulfilled one’s obligation. The implication is that whenever one makes Tashlumin one should put the [[Shemoneh Esrei]] one is obligated in presently first and then the Tashlumin and if one did the opposite one hasn’t fulfilled one’s obligation. This is the ruling of the Tur, Darkei Moshe, and S”A 108:1. Many Achronim agree with this opinion including Eliyah Rabba 108:1, Ben Ish Chai (Mishpatim #9), and Nahar Shalom 108:2. | * The halacha that the first one is supposed to be [[Mincha]] and the second Tashlumin for [[Shacharit]] is based on the Briatta on the top of [[Brachot]] 26b which says that if one forgot to say [[Mincha]] of [[Shabbat]] one should say [[Arvit]] on Motzei [[Shabbat]] twice the first one with [[Havdalah]] ([[Atta Chonatanu]]) and the second without [[Havdalah]] and if one switched the order one has not fulfilled one’s obligation. The implication is that whenever one makes Tashlumin one should put the [[Shemoneh Esrei]] one is obligated in presently first and then the Tashlumin and if one did the opposite one hasn’t fulfilled one’s obligation. This is the ruling of the Tur, Darkei Moshe, and S”A 108:1. Many Achronim agree with this opinion including Eliyah Rabba 108:1, Ben Ish Chai (Mishpatim #9), and Nahar Shalom 108:2. | ||
* However, the Magan Avraham 108:2 questions S”A saying that explicit intent isn’t indicative but rather the only time when one doesn’t fulfill one’s obligation is when one adds a [[prayer]] into one of the [[Shemoneh Esrei]]s which clearly reveals that one meant the Tashlumin to be first. The Taz 108:2, Chaye 27:4, Chida in Kesher Gudal 22:11 agree with the Magan Avraham. | * However, the Magan Avraham 108:2 questions S”A saying that explicit intent isn’t indicative but rather the only time when one doesn’t fulfill one’s obligation is when one adds a [[prayer]] into one of the [[Shemoneh Esrei]]s which clearly reveals that one meant the Tashlumin to be first. The Taz 108:2, Chaye 27:4, Chida in Kesher Gudal 22:11 agree with the Magan Avraham. | ||
* In conclusion, the S”A HaRav 108:1 and Pri Megadim (A”A 108:2) write that one should be concerned for the opinion of the Magan Avraham and if one makes a mistake and has intent that the first one should be the Tashlumin then one should pray again voluntarily. However, the Beiur Halacha 108:1 | * In conclusion, the S”A HaRav 108:1 and Pri Megadim (A”A 108:2) write that one should be concerned for the opinion of the Magan Avraham and if one makes a mistake and has intent that the first one should be the Tashlumin then one should pray again voluntarily. However, the Beiur Halacha 108:1 s.v. VeIm Hiyfech writes that the halacha follows S”A. The Yalkut Yosef (108:1, [[Tefillah]] pg 566, Sherit Yosef vol 3 pg 75) writes that the primary halacha follows the S”A however it’s preferable to stipulate that if one isn’t obligated that one is praying a voluntary [[prayer]]. </ref> | ||
==Tashlumin for Mussaf== | ==Tashlumin for Mussaf== | ||
# There is no makeup (Tashlumin) if one missed saying [[Mussaf]]. <Ref> Tosfot ([[Brachot]] 26a | # There is no makeup (Tashlumin) if one missed saying [[Mussaf]]. <Ref> Tosfot ([[Brachot]] 26a s.v. Iybah) writes that there’s no tashlumin for [[Mussaf]] because you can’t say the (pesukim or inyan of) [[Korbanot]] at night and [[Mussaf]] was instituted as a remembrance of [[Korbanot]] and not a request of mercy. Rabbenu Yonah 18a D”G Taah(2), and Rosh 4:1 agree. This is the ruling of Tur and S”A 108:6. Kitzur S"A 21:8 concurs.</ref> | ||
# Some say that there's no Tashlumin if one missed Neilah of [[Yom Kippur]], while others disagree. <ref>Chazon Ovadya (Yamim Noraim, Hilchot Neilah) writes that there's no Tashlumin for Neilah, while the Or Letzion argues that there is Tashlumin for Neilah. </ref> | # Some say that there's no Tashlumin if one missed Neilah of [[Yom Kippur]], while others disagree. <ref>Chazon Ovadya (Yamim Noraim, Hilchot Neilah) writes that there's no Tashlumin for Neilah, while the Or Letzion argues that there is Tashlumin for Neilah. </ref> | ||
==Women== | ==Women== | ||
