11
edits
Talk:Netilat Yadayim upon Waking Up: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* To YitzchakSultan: Are you sure this applies at all by netillas yadayim in the morning, when acc. to the Rosh the whole reason for the mitzvah is because the hands are NOT clean (and although it does seem from the rosh in Berachos 9:23 [see Agur hilchos tefillah 3] that you're allowed to make berachos in the morning with yadayim metunafos, the shulchan aruch clearly rules like the rashba that youre not allowed to), and therefore it should be assur to say any berachos prior thereof? And if you'll clean the hands first it should come out that you're not obligated in the mitzvah at all anymore acc. to the rosh. I'm pretty certain Rabbi Lebowitz's anecdote with Rav Schachter was by Netilas Yadayim for a seudah. [[User:LeviGoldman]] | * To YitzchakSultan: Are you sure this applies at all by netillas yadayim in the morning, when acc. to the Rosh the whole reason for the mitzvah is because the hands are NOT clean (and although it does seem from the rosh in Berachos 9:23 [see Agur hilchos tefillah 3] that you're allowed to make berachos in the morning with yadayim metunafos, the shulchan aruch clearly rules like the rashba that youre not allowed to), and therefore it should be assur to say any berachos prior thereof? And if you'll clean the hands first it should come out that you're not obligated in the mitzvah at all anymore acc. to the rosh. I'm pretty certain Rabbi Lebowitz's anecdote with Rav Schachter was by Netilas Yadayim for a seudah. [[User:LeviGoldman]] | ||
* Levi Goldman, you're right. Rav Schachter's anecdote was only regarding washing by the meal and the reasons as to why it can't apply do make sense. --[[User:YitzchakSultan|YitzchakSultan]] ([[User talk:YitzchakSultan|talk]]) 23:07, 23 July 2015 (EDT) | * Levi Goldman, you're right. Rav Schachter's anecdote was only regarding washing by the meal and the reasons as to why it can't apply do make sense. --[[User:YitzchakSultan|YitzchakSultan]] ([[User talk:YitzchakSultan|talk]]) 23:07, 23 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
* To YitzchakSultan: In the article, all references to this "Sephardic minhag" are from siman 158, and therefore presumably irrelevant to our sugya. Should I erase them from the article? --[[User:LeviGoldman]] | * To YitzchakSultan: In the article, all references to this "Sephardic minhag" are from siman 158, and therefore presumably irrelevant to our sugya. Should I erase them from the article? --[[User:LeviGoldman|LeviGoldman]] | ||
