Anonymous

Self Defense: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
Line 37: Line 37:


# The commentators disagree over the extent of this ruling. The Talmud clearly says pekuach nefesh overrides all mitzvot in the Torah with the exception of sexual immorality, Avodah Zara, and murder. Given that, one should be able to perform theft for the purpose of saving their life. Does this ruling imply one cannot save oneself, or that
# The commentators disagree over the extent of this ruling. The Talmud clearly says pekuach nefesh overrides all mitzvot in the Torah with the exception of sexual immorality, Avodah Zara, and murder. Given that, one should be able to perform theft for the purpose of saving their life. Does this ruling imply one cannot save oneself, or that
 
There is an exception to the prohibition of saving oneself with the property of another person. A person is permitted to self themself by destroying property that is a rodef to him- or belongs to a rodef.
Elsewhere in the Talmud
 
A later dispute emerged in the commentators about someone offered the choice of death or handing over the property of a friend. Which choice should someone pick, and are they liable to compensate their friend if they end up picking the option of handing over property?


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
<references/>
<references/>