Anonymous

Tochen: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
2,667 bytes added ,  31 July 2024
Line 17: Line 17:
#Cutting up vegetables into small pieces in order to cook them and shaving down a metal rod are examples of toldot of Tochen.<ref>Rambam hilchot shabbat 7:5, 8:15, 21:18 </ref>
#Cutting up vegetables into small pieces in order to cook them and shaving down a metal rod are examples of toldot of Tochen.<ref>Rambam hilchot shabbat 7:5, 8:15, 21:18 </ref>


== Chopping Vegetables for a Salad ==
== How Small is Small? ==
 
=== Making a Salad ===
# It is forbidden to cut vegetables into very small pieces.<ref>The gemara shabbat 74b cites Rav Papa as stating that one who is פרים סילקא (lit: chops up beets) into small pieces has violated the melacha of tochen. This is Rashi's girsa in the gemara there. However, according to many rishonim, it is actually not so simple that merely chopping vegetables would be a problem of tochen.
# It is forbidden to cut vegetables into very small pieces.<ref>The gemara shabbat 74b cites Rav Papa as stating that one who is פרים סילקא (lit: chops up beets) into small pieces has violated the melacha of tochen. This is Rashi's girsa in the gemara there. However, according to many rishonim, it is actually not so simple that merely chopping vegetables would be a problem of tochen.


*(1) The Rosh 7:5 cites from Rabbenu Chananel that the correct pshat in the gemara is one who grinds up twigs into sawdust. The Rosh asks how Rashi could think that merely chopping up vegetables would be a violation of tochen. The Korban Netanel 10 explains that the Torah wouldn't have prohibited chopping up vegetables because it's impossible to give a clear guideline as to how small is small, and because this type of chopping doesn't really have a significant effect on the vegetable (in contrast to grinding wheat into flour, which completely changes the character of the wheat into a new entity). Thus, according to the Rosh / R"C, there is never an issue of tochen with chopping vegetables.
*(1) The Rosh 7:5 cites from Rabbenu Chananel that the correct pshat in the gemara is one who grinds up twigs into sawdust. The Rosh asks how Rashi could think that merely chopping up vegetables would be a violation of tochen. The Korban Netanel 10 explains that the Torah wouldn't have prohibited chopping up vegetables because it's impossible to give a clear guideline as to how small is small, and because this type of chopping doesn't really have a significant effect on the vegetable (in contrast to grinding wheat into flour, which completely changes the character of the wheat into a new entity). Thus, according to the Rosh / R"C, there is never an issue of tochen with chopping vegetables.


*(2) Tosfot (shabbat 74b s.v. high) is seemingly bothered by the Rosh's question on Rashi, and so even though he learns the gemara like Rashi (that the gemara is discussing chopping up beets), he limits it by stating that only beets are included in this prohibition, but not other vegetables. He doesn't explain what makes beets unique that only they would be subject to tochen if chopped up into small pieces. Minchat Chinuch (tochen 2) explains that tosfot means to distinguish between vegetables that can be eaten raw and those that need to be cooked. Beets must be cooked, and so chopping is viewed as the preparatory step towards cooking, and thus a more significant act. In contrast, when one chops up a vegetable that doesn't need to be cooked, this is viewed as just part of the eating process.  
*(2) Tosfot (shabbat 74b s.v. high) is seemingly bothered by the Rosh's question on Rashi, and so even though he learns the gemara like Rashi (that the gemara is discussing chopping up beets), he limits it by stating that only beets are included in this prohibition, but not other vegetables. He doesn't explain what makes beets unique that only they would be subject to tochen if chopped up into small pieces. Minchat Chinuch (tochen 2) explains that tosfot means to distinguish between vegetables that can be eaten raw and those that need to be cooked. Beets must be cooked, and so chopping is viewed as the preparatory step towards cooking, and thus a more significant act. In contrast, when one chops up a vegetable that doesn't need to be cooked, this is viewed as just part of the eating process.


*(3) This idea is explicitly stated by the Ritva 74b, that only beets and other vegetables which are not eaten raw would be subject to this prohibition of tochen.  
*(3) This idea is explicitly stated by the Ritva 74b, that only beets and other vegetables which are not eaten raw would be subject to this prohibition of tochen.


*(4) There are some who suggest that the Rambam agrees to a variation of this idea as well. He writes in a few places that one has violated tochen when they chop up vegetables into small pieces "כדי לבשלו" (lit: in order to cook them). It sounds like he thinks that only if the chopping is a preparatory step in the cooking process is it viewed as a significant act that would be defined as melacha [this is still slightly different than the Ritva; if there is a vegetable that can be eaten raw, but one chops it up in order to cook it, they would still be obligated according to this understanding of the Rambam, even though they would be patur according to the Ritva]. The Kesef Mishna (hilchot shabbat 21:18) understands the Rambam this way. However, many achronim disagree (Aruch Hashulchan 321:4; Minchat Chinuch tochen 2; Biur Hagra 321:15), and think that the Rambam merely mentioned "in order to cook them" just to describe a situation in which one would chop up vegetables into small pieces, but it is not actually a requirement that the chopping be done to prepare for cooking.
*(4) There are some who suggest that the Rambam agrees to a variation of this idea as well. He writes in a few places that one has violated tochen when they chop up vegetables into small pieces "כדי לבשלו" (lit: in order to cook them). It sounds like he thinks that only if the chopping is a preparatory step in the cooking process is it viewed as a significant act that would be defined as melacha [this is still slightly different than the Ritva; if there is a vegetable that can be eaten raw, but one chops it up in order to cook it, they would still be obligated according to this understanding of the Rambam, even though they would be patur according to the Ritva]. The Kesef Mishna (hilchot shabbat 21:18) understands the Rambam this way. However, many achronim disagree (Aruch Hashulchan 321:4; Minchat Chinuch tochen 2; Biur Hagra 321:15), and think that the Rambam merely mentioned "in order to cook them" just to describe a situation in which one would chop up vegetables into small pieces, but it is not actually a requirement that the chopping be done to prepare for cooking.


*However, other rishonim agree to Rashi that there would be an issue to chop up vegetables, even if one does not intend to cook them, and even if they are edible raw. For example, Tosfot (shabbat 114b s.v. ela) states that chopping up vegetables into pieces that are "דקות מאוד" (lit: very small) violates tochen, but chopping them into big pieces is completely permitted (since this isn't considered similar at all to "grinding"). Similarly, Haga'ot Maymoniyot (hilchot shabbat ch 21 ot 70) cites from the Rashbam that crumbling up bread is not a problem of tochen because the bread has already been ground up once (when first made, the wheat was ground into flour), and so tochen can't be violated a second time. The implication here is that without this argument to be lenient, tochen would have been applicable on bread, even though it is food, edible as it is, and one doesn't intend to cook it further.  
*However, other rishonim agree to Rashi that there would be an issue to chop up vegetables, even if one does not intend to cook them, and even if they are edible raw. For example, Tosfot (shabbat 114b s.v. ela) states that chopping up vegetables into pieces that are "דקות מאוד" (lit: very small) violates tochen, but chopping them into big pieces is completely permitted (since this isn't considered similar at all to "grinding"). Similarly, Haga'ot Maymoniyot (hilchot shabbat ch 21 ot 70) cites from the Rashbam that crumbling up bread is not a problem of tochen because the bread has already been ground up once (when first made, the wheat was ground into flour), and so tochen can't be violated a second time. The implication here is that without this argument to be lenient, tochen would have been applicable on bread, even though it is food, edible as it is, and one doesn't intend to cook it further.


*L'halacha, the Shulchan Aruch 321:12 paskens stringently that one who chops up vegetables into pieces that are "דק דק" (lit: very small) has violated the biblical melacha of tochen. As we have seen, many rishonim would disagree with this statement, but of course many would agree, and so the Shulchan Aruch follows the strict approach. However, there is a discussion whether the Rama agrees to this or not. The Rama writes that it is similarly prohibited to chop up figs or carrobs for old people. Why does he specify old people? The Magen Avraham 321:14 suggests that perhaps the Rama understands that it is only prohibited to chop it for old people since they are unable to eat the vegetables otherwise. This type of chopping is significant and thus deemed melacha. However, if someone is able to eat the vegetables even before the chopping, then chopping would be permitted. This is a major leniency. However, it is rejected by the Mishna Brurah (Biur Halacha 321:12 s.v. lifnei), who suggests that really the Rama just mentioned old people because that was the common case, but it was not meant to exclude other people. Practically then, the halacha is that one may not chop vegetables into very small pieces even for one who is able to eat them otherwise. </ref>
*L'halacha, the Shulchan Aruch 321:12 paskens stringently that one who chops up vegetables into pieces that are "דק דק" (lit: very small) has violated the biblical melacha of tochen. As we have seen, many rishonim would disagree with this statement, but of course many would agree, and so the Shulchan Aruch follows the strict approach. However, there is a discussion whether the Rama agrees to this or not. The Rama writes that it is similarly prohibited to chop up figs or carrobs for old people. Why does he specify old people? The Magen Avraham 321:14 suggests that perhaps the Rama understands that it is only prohibited to chop it for old people since they are unable to eat the vegetables otherwise. This type of chopping is significant and thus deemed melacha. However, if someone is able to eat the vegetables even before the chopping, then chopping would be permitted. This is a major leniency. However, it is rejected by the Mishna Brurah (Biur Halacha 321:12 s.v. lifnei), who suggests that really the Rama just mentioned old people because that was the common case, but it was not meant to exclude other people. Practically then, the halacha is that one may not chop vegetables into very small pieces even for one who is able to eat them otherwise.</ref>
## Some say it is permitted to ask a non-Jew to cut up vegetables into very small pieces even though it is not for immediate consumption (e.g. Friday night after the meal for the purpose of lunch the next day).<ref>[https://www.torahanytime.com/#/lectures?v=128698 Rav Yitzchak Yosef (Motzei Shabbat Lech Lecha 5781, min 41-52)] explains that it is permitted to ask a non-Jew to chop up vegetables for a salad for lunch far in advance since there are some opinions in the rishonim who would permit it since the vegetables were edible raw. </ref>
## Some say it is permitted to ask a non-Jew to cut up vegetables into very small pieces even though it is not for immediate consumption (e.g. Friday night after the meal for the purpose of lunch the next day).<ref>[https://www.torahanytime.com/#/lectures?v=128698 Rav Yitzchak Yosef (Motzei Shabbat Lech Lecha 5781, min 41-52)] explains that it is permitted to ask a non-Jew to chop up vegetables for a salad for lunch far in advance since there are some opinions in the rishonim who would permit it since the vegetables were edible raw. </ref>
# It is permitted to cut vegetables into pieces that are somewhat large, immediately before the meal.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 6:6. This is based on the leniency of the Rashbah (discussed below) that one may perform tochen right before consumption. The Beit Yosef isn't willing to rely upon the Rashbah fully, but he suggests that if one chops up the vegetables a little bit bigger than normal (such that it might not be "דק דק"), then one can rely upon the Rashbah to do so right before the meal. The Mishna Brurah 321:45 paskens this way as well.</ref>  
# It is permitted to cut vegetables into pieces that are somewhat large, immediately before the meal.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 6:6. This is based on the leniency of the Rashbah (discussed below) that one may perform tochen right before consumption. The Beit Yosef isn't willing to rely upon the Rashbah fully, but he suggests that if one chops up the vegetables a little bit bigger than normal (such that it might not be "דק דק"), then one can rely upon the Rashbah to do so right before the meal. The Mishna Brurah 321:45 paskens this way as well.</ref>  
## What is considered somewhat large? As long as the pieces are cut larger than typically cut during the week.<ref>39 Melachos v. 2 p. 460, Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2914 citing Chazon Ish 57 s.v. vheneh, Brit Olam (Tochen 20), Az Nidbaru 11:8, 12:22, Shabbos Kitchen ch. 9 fnt. 19, Rivevot Efraim 5:260:3, Hilchos Shabbos (Rav Eider fnt. 91)</ref>
## What is considered somewhat large?
# It is permitted to cut vegetables into large pieces, even far in advance of a meal.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2913</ref>
### This is a debate amongst the poskim.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2913-5 cites 3 main approaches:
## What is considered large pieces?
*Rav Belsky (OU Documents S-34) holds that the size for tochen is cutting it smaller than one usually cuts. Rav Elyashiv (Am Mekadshei Sheviyi 1:6:4) and Hilchos Shabbos (Rav Eider fnt. 39) concur.
### Some say that pieces that are larger than one usually cuts them is considered large. Inversely, some say that anything a cook or housewife would consider 'very small' is considered small.
*Yashiv Moshe (Nishmat Shabbat 315:2) and the Shabbos Kitchen (p. 130) write that it is a problem of tochen if one cuts it to a size that people consider very small.
###Some say that pieces that one still needs to chew and can't swallow whole is considered large.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2913-5 cites 3 main approaches:
*Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 6 fnt. 6, Minchat Shlomo 1:91:13, Shulchan Shlomo 321:13:2) seems to hold that as long as one still needs to chew on it to eat it (and can't just swallow it), it is big enough to not violate tochen. 39 Melachos v. 2 p. 458 seems to apply Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach's opinion to permit cutting any salad, since it will still need to be chewed. However, he concludes that we do not follow that opinion. Minchat Ish 3:4:4 s.v. vheneh has a different interpretation of Rav Shlomo Zalmen which is more strict. RSZ didn't mean that if it's big enough that it can't be swallowed then it is permitted to cut it to that size; rather, RSZ is just saying that if it is a little small then it has made the chewing process easier and is considered tochen.  
*Rav Belsky (OU Documents S-34) as holding that the size for tochen is cutting it smaller than one usually cuts. They also quote Rav Elyashiv (Am Mekadshei Sheviyi 1:6:4) and Hilchos Shabbos (Rav Eider fnt. 39) who concur.
*Lastly, they cite Zachor Vshamor (Tochen 2) who says that if the pieces are larger than 1/2 cm cubed, then it is certainly not considered very small.</ref>
*Yashiv Moshe (Nishmat Shabbat 315:2) and the Shabbos Kitchen (p. 130) write that cutting it to whatever is considered by people to be very small is a problem of tochen.
#### Some define it as pieces which are unable to be swallowed whole and must be chewed.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 6 fnt. 6, Minchat Shlomo 1:91:13, Shulchan Shlomo 321:13:2)</ref>
*Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 6 fnt. 6, Minchat Shlomo 1:91:13, Shulchan Shlomo 321:13:2) holds that as long as one needs to chew on it to eat it it is considered a small piece. Minchat Ish 3:4:4 s.v. vheneh explains that he doesn't mean that if it is big enough that would one need to chew it then it is considered big and it is permitted to cut it to that size, rather he is just coming to say that if it is a little small then it has made the chewing process easier and is considered tochen. 39 Melachos v. 2 p. 458 seems to apply Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach's opinion to permit cutting any salad since it will still need to be chewed, however, he concludes that we do not follow that opinion.
#### Others define it as pieces that are cut larger than typically cut during the week.<ref>39 Melachos v. 2 p. 460, Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2914 citing Chazon Ish 57 s.v. vheneh, Brit Olam (Tochen 20), Az Nidbaru 11:8, 12:22, Shabbos Kitchen ch. 9 fnt. 19, Rivevot Efraim 5:260:3, Hilchos Shabbos (Rav Eider fnt. 91)</ref>
*Lastly, they cite Zachor Vshamor (Tochen 2) who says that if the pieces are larger than .5 cm^3 it is certainly not considered very small.</ref>
#### Others define it as pieces that most people would consider small.<ref>Yashiv Moshe (Nishmat Shabbat 315:2) and the Shabbos Kitchen (p. 130)</ref>
# It is permitted to cut vegetables into large pieces, even far in advance of a meal.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2913</ref>
 
=== Slicing Along a Single Axis ===
#There is a debate amongst the poskim if the prohibition of tochen applies only if the food is being cut very small in all dimensions or if it even applies if one is slicing in one direction, such as when slicing an egg or tomato.<ref>Rav Moshe Feinstein (Iggerot Moshe OC 4:74:Tochen 3) writes that slicing foods in one direction isn’t considered tochen because otherwise there would be no limit. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Sh”t Minchat Shlomo 91:13) also rules this way. On the other hand, Ketzot HaShulchan Siman 129 Badei HaShulchan 2 quotes that the Tzemach Tzedek was stringent. Additionally, Orchot Shabbos page 217 chapter 5:footnote 12 writes that Rav Elyashiv was stringent as well.<br /> </ref>
 
=== Mashing ===
 
#There is a debate amongst the poskim if the prohibition of Tochen applies to fruit or vegetables (such as bananas and avocados) that do not separate into individual pieces when mashed, but rather just change shape and remain one large mass.<ref>The Tosefta (Beitza 1:19) says that "Pressed or dried figs cannot be crushed before the elderly." The Chazon Ish (57, “nimtzeinu”) writes that when pressed or dried figs are crushed, they remain one mass, and therefore even in such a case tochen is applicable. In light of this, the Chazon Ish writes that it is forbidden to mash a banana even though it remains one mass after being mashed. He thinks that this is forbidden even for immediate eating (since he rejects the leniency of the Rashba, and thinks that even the Rashba was only lenient by chopping vegetables, but wouldn't be lenient here). Therefore, he says one must mash the banana with a shinui. However, Rav Moshe Feinstein (Iggerot Moshe OC 4:74:Tochen 2) rules that mashing is not subject to the prohibition of Tochen (since you aren't actually separating it into different parts), and thus the banana may be mashed in the regular manner. He also thinks that if there would be an isur of tochen here, then it shouldn't be mutar just because you do it with a shinuy. He nevertheless concludes that if possible, one should mash the banana with a shinui in order to be machmir for the position of the Chazon Ish.<br /> </ref>
##Therefore, it is better to do so with a shinui.<ref>Rabbi Ribiat (“The 39 Melochos” pg. 461) sides with Rav Moshe that really me'ikar hadin one may mash the banana without a shinuy because mashing is not considered tochen. Chacham Ovadia Yosef (Yechave Daat 5:27) agrees to the Chazon Ish that mashing is considered tochen, but permits one to mash a banana with a fork to feed immediately to a child. Rabbi Moshe Halevi (Menuchat Ahava 2: pg. 278), writes that he should preferably do so in an unusual manner, such as by using the handle of the fork. Shemirat Shabbos Kehilchita 6:7-8 forbids mashing a banana or avocado unless one uses a shinui. </ref>
##If it's already so soft that when one simply pulls a piece of the fruit, that piece separates from the rest of the fruit, then it is permitted to mash.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:7 </ref>


==For Immediate Consumption==
==For Immediate Consumption==
Line 51: Line 63:
##The above leniency is only if one uses a regular knife, but not a special dicing utensil.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:44 and Shemirat Shabbos KeHilchata 6:6 </ref>
##The above leniency is only if one uses a regular knife, but not a special dicing utensil.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:44 and Shemirat Shabbos KeHilchata 6:6 </ref>
#How do we define "immediate consumption"?
#How do we define "immediate consumption"?
##The above leniency applies whether one is preparing for one's own immediate consumption or another person's immediate consumption.<ref>Bet Yosef 321 based on the Tosfot ([[Shabbat]] 74a s.v. [[Borer]] UMayni'ach) writes that it is permitted to do Tochen for another person's immediate consumption just like it is permitted to do Tochen for one's own immediate consumption. Mishna Brurah 321:43 agrees.</ref>
##It is considered "immediate" as long as one makes the salad right before beginning the meal in which it will be eaten.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:45, Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:6, Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 382) </ref>
##It is also considered "immediate" if one makes the salad right before beginning the meal in which it will be eaten.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:45, Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:6, Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 382) </ref>
###If one plans on going to shul, then one should make the salad after coming back from shul, not before.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:45</ref>
##The above leniency applies whether one is preparing for one's own immediate consumption or another person's.<ref>Bet Yosef 321 based on the Tosfot ([[Shabbat]] 74a s.v. [[Borer]] UMayni'ach) writes that it is permitted to do Tochen for another person's immediate consumption just like it is permitted to do Tochen for one's own immediate consumption. Mishna Brurah 321:43 agrees.</ref>
##If one made a salad for one meal and there was leftovers, one is allowed to eat it at another meal.<ref>Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 389) </ref>
##If one made a salad for one meal and there was leftovers, one is allowed to eat it at another meal.<ref>Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 389) </ref>


==Cooked Fruits and Vegetables==
==Various Leniencies==
#Fruits or vegetables which were cooked to the point that it is very easy to mash may be crushed on [[Shabbat]]. It can be mashed on Shabbat even with the prongs of a fork but not a strainer.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:9</ref> Some say that it isn't permitted to mash unless its shape partially was crushed or fell apart because of the cooking.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata (English Version p. 73) clearly translates that vegetables cooked before Shabbat need to be already crushed in that they have changed their shape or fallen apart. This is certainly the ruling of Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (ch. 6 fnt. 22). However, Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 6:9 implies that essentially if it is very soft then it is permissible to mash on Shabbat even if it didn't lose its shape. See also 6:10. Orchot Shabbat 5:9 similarly sounds like it is permitted with the same conditions and doesn't require that the shape change or fall apart. The Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2923 cites the Nishmat Shabbat 321:317:4 who is lenient and the Hilchot Shabbat BShabbat (ch. 11 fnt. 41) who is strict.</ref>
#Potatoes or vegetables which were cooked may not be put through a strainer in order to puree it (as the strainer is designated for that purpose) but one is permitted to crush it with a fork (even the prongs) as long as it was cooked to the point that it's easy to crush. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:10 </ref>
#One shouldn’t use a strainer to puree or cream a cooked fruit or vegetable since the strainer has a designated purpose of being used to mash.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:10 </ref>


==Pre-crushed food==
=== Pre-crushed Food (אין טוחן אחר טוחן) ===
#Food that was made from crushed particles may be crushed on [[Shabbat]] if one will eat it on shabbat. This is based on the principle of "ein tochen achar tochen" (lit: there is no tochen after tochen)<ref>This is based on the principle of "אין טוחן אחר טוחן" (lit: there is no tochen after tochen). There are different explanations given in the achronim to explain why one can't violate tochen a second time.


#Food which was made from crushed particles may be crushed on [[Shabbat]] (not using a utensil designated for crushed but rather a regular knife) if one is going to eat it on [[Shabbat]]. For example, one may crush [[matza]], bread, crackers, chocolate, and sugar. <ref>The Rama 321:12 rules that it is permitted to crush up bread because the flour was already ground up when it was made. Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:11 extends this to breaking up [[matza]], crackers, chocolate, and sugar.</ref>
*(1) The Chazon Ish (OC:57 s.v. inyan), cited by Dirshu Mishna Brurah (siman 321 footnote 55), explains that really the point here is that a substance which was joined together by a human being (as opposed to naturally forming) isn't really considered to be unified in a real way. Hence, the bread, which is made up of flour particles that were joined together via kneading it with water, isn't considered a unit and thus not subject to tochen. This is different than wheat, which formed naturally and so is considered a unit, and therefore would be subject to tochen.  
#Salt granules which solidified because of a moisture may be crushed on [[Shabbat]], however, one may not crush salt crystals (looking like blocks) or any other spice which has never yet been crushed unless one does two Shinui's (changes) by using the handle of the knife or fork on a plate or the table. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:11 </ref>
#Food which was crushed very well before [[Shabbat]] or on [[Shabbat]] in a permissible may may be further cut on [[Shabbat]] even in the normal fashion. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:12 </ref>
#If someone made farina or rice porridge before Shabbat and now on Shabbat it is dry, one may pour hot water even from a ''Kli Rishon'' onto the farina or rice porridge to dilute it and mix it up. One may even crush the clumps with a spoon.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:13 </ref> To make farina as a thin mixture that pours from scratch on Shabbat one should make a change in how the ingredients are put in. If the farina is usually put in first and the water, on Shabbat one should first put in the water first and then the farina and vice versa.<ref>Divarecha Yair 3:14 writes that farina or cream of wheat is usually made as a thin batter food and so it only needs a shinuy in the order of putting in the ingredients.</ref>


==Foods not From the Ground==
*(2) The Gra (biur hagra 321:16) comments on the Rama that the same is true for every melacha. Clearly then, he understands that the principle of "no tochen after tochen" is not saying anything particular about tochen (i.e. not like the chazon ish). Rather, it is a general point about melacha. One cannot violate the melacha a second time, presumably because it is no longer really accomplishing something significant. This is thus similar to the principle of "no bishul after bishul", that once something is cooked, it cannot be cooked again (unless perhaps if it is liquid and it cools down).


#Even though there is an issue of tochen on non-food items as well as food items, foods that do not grow from the ground such as meat, eggs, and cheese are not subject to the prohibition as long as one plans on eating them that Shabbat.<ref>Gemara Shabbos 74b writes that one who grinds firewood into small pieces is chayav for tochen. Rambam Shabbos 7:5 includes metal as a tolada of tochen. The Minchat Chinuch (Musach Hashabbos Tochen 4) concludes based on the Rambam’s example that tochen applies to items which are not gidulei karka, and he adds that this is also the view of the Rashi (74b “Sheva”), who writes that there is a prohibition of tochen for clods of earth. However, the Pri Megadim (Mishbetzot Zahav 321:10) write that both dirt and metal may be considered gidulei karka. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 321:9 based on Terumat Hadeshen 56 writes that one may cut cooked meat into very small pieces. Mishna Brura 321:31 explains that this is because it isn’t gidulei karka and therefore the prohibition doesn’t apply. Shemirat Shabbos KeHilchata 6:14 and Yalkut Yosef (Shabbos, vol 3, pg 391) extend this to eggs and cheese. Shoneh Halachot 321:24 quotes the Chazon Ish that one may not be lenient with things that do not grow in the ground unless the intention is to eat them immediately.</ref>
*(3) Rebbe Akiva Eiger seems to have a different understanding. The Shulchan Aruch 302:7 says that one may not use their fingernail to scratch off dry dirt from their clothing, because this would inevitably grind up the dirt and thereby violate tochen. Rebbe Akiva Eiger there asks why this should be a problem of tochen given that in general we hold "no tochen after tochen", and certainly this dirt was initially disparate and only became a unit after drying up. He is clearly arguing on the chazon ish, as he's applying ein tochen achar tochen even to a case when it naturally formed. He is also seemingly against the Gra, because he's applying ein tochen achar tochen to a case when it was never actually ground up by before, but merely started off disparate and then joined together on its own. He seems to understand that as long as a unit began as disparate pieces, then there will be no problem of tochen to grind it up. Tochen is only relevant on something which was always a unit, such as wheat and the like.</ref>
#One may not crush or grind up raw meat on Shabbat since otherwise it isn't edible.<ref>Rama 321:9, Kaf Hachaim 324:29</ref> If it is for immediate consumption it is permitted.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:33, Tiferet 321:47 citing Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 4 p. 270</ref>
##For example, one may crush [[matza]], bread, crackers, chocolate, and sugar.<ref>The Rama 321:12 rules that it is permitted to crush up bread because the flour was already ground up when it was made. Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:11 extends this to breaking up [[matza]], crackers, chocolate, and sugar.</ref>
#Food which was crushed very well before [[Shabbat]], or on [[Shabbat]] in a permissible way, may be further cut on [[Shabbat]] even in the normal fashion.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:12 </ref>
#If someone made farina or rice porridge before Shabbat and now on Shabbat it is dry, one may pour hot water even from a ''Kli Rishon'' onto the farina or rice porridge to dilute it and mix it up. One may even crush the clumps with a spoon.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:13 </ref>


==Grinding for a Small Child==
=== Foods not From the Ground ===
#Even though there is an issue of tochen on non-food items as well as food items, foods that do not grow from the ground such as meat, eggs, and cheese are not subject to the prohibition of tochen.<ref>Gemara Shabbos 74b writes that one who grinds firewood into small pieces is chayav for tochen. Rambam Shabbos 7:5 includes grinding metal as a tolda of tochen. The Minchat Chinuch (Musach Hashabbos Tochen 4) concludes based on the Rambam’s example that tochen applies to items which are not gidulei karka, and he adds that this is also the view of Rashi (gemara 74b s.v. “Sheva”), who writes that there is a prohibition of tochen for clods of Earth. However, the Pri Megadim (Mishbetzot Zahav 321:10) writes that both dirt and metal may be considered gidulei karka. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 321:9, based on Terumat Hadeshen 56, writes that one may cut cooked meat into very small pieces. Mishna Brurah 321:31 explains that this is because it isn’t gidulei karka and therefore the prohibition doesn’t apply. Shemirat Shabbos KeHilchata 6:14 and Yalkut Yosef (Shabbos, vol 3, pg 391) extend this to eggs and cheese. Shoneh Halachot 321:24 quotes the Chazon Ish that one may not be lenient with things that do not grow in the ground unless the intention is to eat them immediately.</ref>
#One may not grind up raw meat on Shabbat, since otherwise it isn't edible.<ref>Rama 321:9, Kaf Hachaim 324:29</ref> If it is for immediate consumption it is permitted.<ref>Mishna Brurah 321:33, Tiferet 321:47 citing Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 4 p. 270</ref>


#One can be lenient to cut a food very small for a small child to eat so long as it’s immediately prior to the meal. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:6, Iggeros Moshe OC 4:74, Tochen 2. </ref>
=== Cooked Fruits and Vegetables ===
#It’s forbidden to mash or squash a fruit or vegetable such as a banana or tomato. If one has to mash a banana for a small child one should do it with a variation such as using the handle of a fork or a spoon. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:8 </ref>
#Fruits or vegetables which were cooked to the point that it is very easy to mash may be crushed on [[Shabbat]]. It can be mashed on Shabbat even with the prongs of a fork, but not a strainer.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:9</ref> Some say that it isn't permitted to mash unless its shape partially was crushed or fell apart because of the cooking.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata (English Version p. 73) clearly translates that vegetables cooked before Shabbat need to be already crushed in that they have changed their shape or fallen apart. This is certainly the ruling of Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (ch. 6 fnt. 22). However, Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 6:9 implies that essentially if it is very soft then it is permissible to mash on Shabbat even if it didn't lose its shape. See also 6:10. Orchot Shabbat 5:9 similarly sounds like it is permitted with the same conditions and doesn't require that the shape change or fall apart. The Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2923 cites the Nishmat Shabbat 321:317:4 who is lenient and the Hilchot Shabbat BShabbat (ch. 11 fnt. 41) who is strict.</ref>
#It's forbidden to crush a banana or avocado unless it's already so soft that when one pulls a part of the fruit, that part separates from the rest of the fruit. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:7 </ref>
#There is a debate amongst the poskim if the prohibition of Tochen applies to fruit or vegetables such as bananas and avocados which when mashed do not separate into individual pieces but rather just change shape and remain one large mass. Therefore, it is better to do so with a shinui.<ref>The Tosefta (Beitza 1:19) says that "Pressed or dried figs cannot be crushed before the elderly." The Chazon Ish (57, “nimtzeinu”) writes that when pressed or dried figs are crushed, they remain one mass, and therefore even in such a case tochen is applicable. In light of this, the Chazon Ish writes that it is forbidden to mash a banana even though it remains one mass, even for immediate eating (lishitaso with above about immediate eating). Therefore, he says one must do so with a shinui. However, Rav Moshe Feinstein (Iggerot Moshe OC 4:74:Tochen 2) rules that they are not subject to the prohibition of Tochen and may be mashed in the regular manner. He says even if we accept that the prohibition applies even for immediate eating, it is only applicable when one takes one body and turns it into smaller components. However, taking a substance and mashing it while it remains one mass isn’t a problem. He nevertheless concludes that if possible, one should do it with a shinui to be machmir for the Chazon Ish. Rabbi Ribiat (“The 39 Melochos” pg. 461) sides with Rav Moshe. Chacham Ovadia Yosef (Yechave Daat 5:27), though he agrees that mashing is included in tochen, permits one to mash a banana with a fork to feed immediately to a child. Rabbi Moshe Halevi (Menuchat Ahava 2: pg. 278), writes that he should preferably do so in an unusual manner, such as by using the handle of the fork. Shemirat Shabbos Kehilchita 6:7-8 forbids mashing a banana or avocado unless one uses a shinui. <br /> </ref>


==Slicing==
==Grinding for a Small Child==


#There is a machloket amongst the poskim if the prohibition applies only if the food is being cut very small in all dimensions or if it even applies if one is slicing in one direction such as an egg or tomato.<ref>Rav Moshe Feinstein (Iggerot Moshe OC 4:74:Tochen 3) writes that slicing foods in one direction isn’t considered tochen because otherwise there would be no limit. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Sh”t Minchat Shlomo 91:13) also rules this way. On the other hand, Ketzot HaShulchan Siman 129 Badei HaShulchan 2 quotes that the Tzemach Tzedek was stringent. Additionally, Orchot Shabbos page 217 chapter 5:footnote 12 writes that Rav Elyashiv was stringent as well.<br /> </ref>
#One can be lenient to cut a food very small for a small child to eat, so long as it is done immediately prior to the meal.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:6, Iggeros Moshe OC 4:74, Tochen 2. </ref>
#If one wants to mash a banana or avocado for a small child (see above section on whether "mashing" is included in tochen), one should do it with a shinuy (lit: variation), such as using the handle of a fork or a spoon.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:8 </ref>  


==Utensils Designed for Grinding==
==Utensils Designed for Grinding==
Line 95: Line 106:
#It’s permissible to use a peeler to peel vegetables on [[Shabbat]].<ref>Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 391) </ref>
#It’s permissible to use a peeler to peel vegetables on [[Shabbat]].<ref>Yalkut Yosef ([[Shabbat]], vol 3, pg 391) </ref>
#A cucumber or tomato slicer may not be used on Shabbat.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2891 quotes Rav Elyashiv (Zachor Vshamor ch. 1 fnt. 30) that a tomato slicer is a problem of tochen and Dor Hamelaktim compares it to a cucumber slicer.</ref>
#A cucumber or tomato slicer may not be used on Shabbat.<ref>Dor Hamelaktim v. 5 p. 2891 quotes Rav Elyashiv (Zachor Vshamor ch. 1 fnt. 30) that a tomato slicer is a problem of tochen and Dor Hamelaktim compares it to a cucumber slicer.</ref>
#Potatoes or vegetables which were cooked may not be put through a strainer in order to puree it (as the strainer is designated for that purpose) but one is permitted to crush it with a fork (even the prongs) as long as it was cooked to the point that it's easy to crush. <ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:10 </ref>
#One shouldn’t use a strainer to puree or cream a cooked fruit or vegetable since the strainer has a designated purpose of being used to mash.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:10 </ref>
#Salt granules which solidified because of a moisture may be crushed on [[Shabbat]]. However, one may not crush salt crystals (looking like blocks) or any other spice which has never yet been crushed, unless one does two Shinui's (changes) by using the handle of the knife or fork on a plate or the table.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 6:11 </ref>


==Related Pages==
==Related Pages==
114

edits