Anonymous

Shulchan Aruch: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
(→‎Yesh veYesh (יש ויש): yesh veyeshi mi sheomer chida)
(→‎Klalei Bedek HaBayit: lost kuntressim)
Line 35: Line 35:
# The emendations of the Bedek HaBayit were not always printed on the right Siman in Beit Yosef.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref>
# The emendations of the Bedek HaBayit were not always printed on the right Siman in Beit Yosef.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref>
# The Rama didn't see the Bedek HaBayit,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref> because it was printed after he died.<ref>Elyah Rabbah 101:3, Birkei Yosef Yoreh Deah 286:2 and Orach Chaim 27:4 and 101, Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 "Bedek HaBayit," Sdei Cheemd Klalei HaPoskim 14:9), Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
# The Rama didn't see the Bedek HaBayit,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref> because it was printed after he died.<ref>Elyah Rabbah 101:3, Birkei Yosef Yoreh Deah 286:2 and Orach Chaim 27:4 and 101, Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 "Bedek HaBayit," Sdei Cheemd Klalei HaPoskim 14:9), Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
# When faced with a Bedek HaBayit that permits something prohibited in the Beit Yosef, the Kenesset HaGedolah argues it doesn't indicate retraction: the Beit Yosef is a comprehensive compilation of all the opinions, so he was just filling it in but doesn't necessarily hold of it.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 37)</ref>
# When faced with a Bedek HaBayit that permits something prohibited in the Beit Yosef, the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] argues it doesn't indicate retraction: the Beit Yosef is a comprehensive compilation of all the opinions, so he was just filling it in but doesn't necessarily hold of it.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 37)</ref>
# Some of the pamphlets of Bedek HaBayit were lost, which may account for contradictions between Beit Yosef and Shulchan Aruch, as the retracting statements never made it to the page.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Yud 165)</ref>


== Klalei Shulchan Aruch ==
== Klalei Shulchan Aruch ==