1,988
edits
Rif: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m
no edit summary
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) m (→Rav Hai Gaon) |
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# If the Gemara presents an answer that unanimously resolves a difficulty in the Mishna but then continues to present additional resolutions from other Amoraim, which we would assume like in practice, the Rif will still quote the unanimously agreeable upon answer, even if it's not LeHalacha.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 21)</ref> | # If the Gemara presents an answer that unanimously resolves a difficulty in the Mishna but then continues to present additional resolutions from other Amoraim, which we would assume like in practice, the Rif will still quote the unanimously agreeable upon answer, even if it's not LeHalacha.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 21)</ref> | ||
# The Be'er Sheva advises one to not be surprised if the Rif omits the okimta of the Gemara in favor of his own original understanding, as he rathers to minimize Machaloket than quote the Gemara. The Yad Malachi argues lengthily against this approach and posits that the Rif merely omits Gemaras he feels to not be Aliba deHilcheta. The Rif and [[Rambam]] aren't Amoraim who have the ability to decide unresolved issues in the Gemara!<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 6)</ref> | # The Be'er Sheva advises one to not be surprised if the Rif omits the okimta of the Gemara in favor of his own original understanding, as he rathers to minimize Machaloket than quote the Gemara. The Yad Malachi argues lengthily against this approach and posits that the Rif merely omits Gemaras he feels to not be Aliba deHilcheta. The Rif and [[Rambam]] aren't Amoraim who have the ability to decide unresolved issues in the Gemara!<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 6)</ref> | ||
# Similar to the rule of Stam vaYesh in reading Shulchan Aruch, when the Rif states that the Halacha follows a certain ruling but there are those who disagree, he intends to rule like the former and is only sharing the latter to transmit the rulings of earlier generations.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 5), Korban Netanel (Klalim 5)</ref> | # Similar to the rule of Stam vaYesh in reading [[Shulchan Aruch]], when the Rif states that the Halacha follows a certain ruling but there are those who disagree, he intends to rule like the former and is only sharing the latter to transmit the rulings of earlier generations.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRif 5), Korban Netanel (Klalim 5)</ref> | ||
# When the Rif writes two reasonings, his intention is to rule like the second.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 5). See the relevant [[Tur#Stam_vaYesh_and_Yesh_veYesh|Tur]] and [[Shulchan_Aruch#Yesh_veYesh_.28.D7.99.D7.A9_.D7.95.D7.99.D7.A9.29|Shulchan Aruch]] sections.</ref> | # When the Rif writes two reasonings, his intention is to rule like the second.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 5). See the relevant [[Tur#Stam_vaYesh_and_Yesh_veYesh|Tur]] and [[Shulchan_Aruch#Yesh_veYesh_.28.D7.99.D7.A9_.D7.95.D7.99.D7.A9.29|Shulchan Aruch]] sections.</ref> | ||
# If the Gemara presents an alternative answer (איכא דאמרי), the Rif will pasken like it instead of the first answer,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 423)</ref> even if the second answer is more stringent and the case is only of DeRabbanan nature.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 1)</ref> | # If the Gemara presents an alternative answer (איכא דאמרי), the Rif will pasken like it instead of the first answer,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTalmud 423)</ref> even if the second answer is more stringent and the case is only of DeRabbanan nature.<ref>Korban Netanel (Klalim 1)</ref> | ||
