Anonymous

Returning Interest That Was Wrongly Collected: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
m (Text replacement - " Biblical" to " biblical")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
Line 23: Line 23:


==Mechila After the Fact==
==Mechila After the Fact==
# If a person incorrectly took interest one should return it but if the borrower forgives the loan (mechila) the lender doesn’t need to return it.<ref>Shulchan Aruch YD 160:5, Rambam 4:13 argues with the Geonim who held that mechila enver worked for ribbit and the Rambam holds that it is worked after the fact.</ref>
# If a person incorrectly took interest one should return it but if the borrower forgives the loan (mechila) the lender doesn’t need to return it.<ref>Shulchan Aruch YD 160:5, Rambam 4:13 argues with the Geonim who held that mechila never works for ribbit and the Rambam holds that it is works after the fact.</ref>
# If a person forced the borrower to swear that he would forgive the interest after he paid it, that is forbidden to give and take interest and the vow is in invalid.<ref>Ritva Bava Metsia 61a s.v. ma, Bedek Habayit 160:5</ref>
# If a person forced the borrower to swear that he would forgive the interest after he paid it, that is forbidden to give and take interest and the vow is in invalid.<ref>Ritva Bava Metsia 61a s.v. ma, Bedek Habayit 160:5</ref>
# The mechila has to be explicit and can’t be assumed by the lender since the borrower didn’t  ask he forgave it.<ref>Pitchei Teshuva 160:1 citing Yavetz 1:147</ref>
# The mechila has to be explicit and can’t be assumed by the lender since the borrower didn’t  ask he forgave it.<ref>Pitchei Teshuva 160:1 citing Yavetz 1:147</ref>
Anonymous user