Anonymous

Respecting Holy Books: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
Line 39: Line 39:


==Bringing a Sefer into the Bathroom==
==Bringing a Sefer into the Bathroom==
# If one needs to bring a sefer into a bathroom some poskim hold that two covers are necessary, while most hold that only one cover is necessary.<ref>Eliya Rabba 43:6 writes that if one needs to bring a sefer into the bathroom one needs to cover it with a double cover like we find by tefillin. Magen Avraham 43:14 argues that it is permitted as long as they're covered with one covering. Radvaz 3:513, Birkei Yosef 85:10, and Halacha Brurah 43:8 agree with the Magen Avraham. Mishna Brurah 43:25 cites the dispute. </ref> Today many poskim are lenient to bring a sefer into the bathroom even without a double covering.<ref>Halacha Brurah 43:8 is lenient like the Magen Avraham because anyway there are other factors to be lenient including the factor that a printed sefer might not have kedusha and our bathrooms might be considered a very clean bathroom in which there is no issue of bringing in a sefer. Yabia Omer YD 4:21:4 and Tzitz Eliezer 11:5 are lenient to bring printed sefarim into a bathroom in one’s pocket since the pocket is one covering and the printed sefarim might not have kedusha. Rivevot Efraim 1:8:2 allows bringing into the bathroom Torah notes with one covering. Similarly, Maharsham 3:357 is lenient with one covering such as a pocket but just keeping a sefer in a transparent covering is insufficient. [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=21547&pgnum=58 Machezeh Eliyahu 1:8:30 p. 58] is lenient and adds that anyway the pants pocket count as a double covering. Teshuvot Vehanhagot 1:125 is strict for any sefer that has a name of Hashem.
# If one needs to bring a sefer into a bathroom some poskim hold that two covers are necessary, while most hold that only one cover is necessary.<ref>Eliya Rabba 43:6 writes that if one needs to bring a sefer into the bathroom one needs to cover it with a double cover like we find by tefillin. Magen Avraham 43:14 argues that it is permitted as long as they're covered with one covering. Radvaz 3:513, Birkei Yosef 85:10, and Halacha Brurah 43:8 agree with the Magen Avraham. Mishna Brurah 43:25 cites the dispute. [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=23523&st=&pgnum=32 Rambam (Responsa Pear Hadar 7)] writes that it is forbidden to bring any writing of Torah into a bathroom uncovered.</ref> Today many poskim are lenient to bring a sefer into the bathroom even without a double covering.<ref>Halacha Brurah 43:8 is lenient like the Magen Avraham because anyway there are other factors to be lenient including the factor that a printed sefer might not have kedusha and our bathrooms might be considered a very clean bathroom in which there is no issue of bringing in a sefer. Yabia Omer YD 4:21:4 and Tzitz Eliezer 11:5 are lenient to bring printed sefarim into a bathroom in one’s pocket since the pocket is one covering and the printed sefarim might not have kedusha. Rivevot Efraim 1:8:2 allows bringing into the bathroom Torah notes with one covering. Similarly, Maharsham 3:357 is lenient with one covering such as a pocket but just keeping a sefer in a transparent covering is insufficient. [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=21547&pgnum=58 Machezeh Eliyahu 1:8:30 p. 58] is lenient and adds that anyway the pants pocket count as a double covering. Teshuvot Vehanhagot 1:125 is strict for any sefer that has a name of Hashem.
* Dirshu 43:20 quotes Ginzei Hakodesh ch. 4 no. 27 that Rav Sheinberg and Rav Karelitz are lenient while Rav Elyashiv and Rav Wosner are strict. In fact the quote is inaccurate. Ginzei Hakodesh is discussing having tashmish in a room with sefarim and regarding that discussion he quotes the above poskim. However, being that everyone agrees that a double covering is necessary for tashmish and many poskim hold only one covering is needed for a bathroom it is clear that the case of a bathroom is more lenient and it isn’t accurate to say that Rav Elyashiv and Rav Wosner are certainly strict.</ref>
* Dirshu 43:20 quotes Ginzei Hakodesh ch. 4 no. 27 that Rav Sheinberg and Rav Karelitz are lenient while Rav Elyashiv and Rav Wosner are strict. In fact the quote is inaccurate. Ginzei Hakodesh is discussing having tashmish in a room with sefarim and regarding that discussion he quotes the above poskim. However, being that everyone agrees that a double covering is necessary for tashmish and many poskim hold only one covering is needed for a bathroom it is clear that the case of a bathroom is more lenient and it isn’t accurate to say that Rav Elyashiv and Rav Wosner are certainly strict.</ref>