Anonymous

Rashba: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
82 bytes added ,  26 September 2019
typo, clarify mishmeret habayit
(→‎Misc.: stirot)
(typo, clarify mishmeret habayit)
Line 1: Line 1:
=General=
=General=
# The [[Rashba]] was a student of the [[Ramban]] and [[Rabbeinu Yonah]], and he was the primary opponent of the [[Ra'ah]].m His students include [[Rabbeinu Bechaye ben Asher]] and the [[Ritva]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Shin 19)</ref>
# The [[Rashba]] was a student of the [[Ramban]] and [[Rabbeinu Yonah]], and he was the primary opponent of the [[Ra'ah]]. His students include [[Rabbeinu Bechaye ben Asher]] and the [[Ritva]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Shin 19)</ref>
# The Rashba had editions of [[Tosafot]] other than the one printed on the page of our Gemaras.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 2)</ref>
# The Rashba had editions of [[Tosafot]] other than the one printed on the page of our Gemaras.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 2)</ref>
# The [[Baalei HaTosafot]] and Rashba share a similar approach, therefore, if the Rashba copies [[Tosafot]], it's a sign of agreement.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 5)</ref>
# The [[Baalei HaTosafot]] and Rashba share a similar approach, therefore, if the Rashba copies [[Tosafot]], it's a sign of agreement.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 5)</ref>
Line 9: Line 9:
# The Torat HaBayit comes in two parts, "Aroch" and "Katzar." The Aroch explains the topics from the Gemara, and the Katzar is just a list of the conclusions. The Rashba expressed dissatisfaction with those who only wanted to spread the Katzar and not the Aroch,<ref>Shu"t HaRashba Siman 273</ref> but, unfortunately, even when it was eventually printed, the printers, not just the copyists, did just that. Indeed, there are more manuscripts of the Katzar than the Aroch, indicating a greater reach by the Katzar than the Aroch. Therefore, Rishonim like the [[Tur]] never saw the Bayit HaAroch.<ref>Beit Yosef (Yoreh Deah 112), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Kuf 93, Taf 39), Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition.</ref>
# The Torat HaBayit comes in two parts, "Aroch" and "Katzar." The Aroch explains the topics from the Gemara, and the Katzar is just a list of the conclusions. The Rashba expressed dissatisfaction with those who only wanted to spread the Katzar and not the Aroch,<ref>Shu"t HaRashba Siman 273</ref> but, unfortunately, even when it was eventually printed, the printers, not just the copyists, did just that. Indeed, there are more manuscripts of the Katzar than the Aroch, indicating a greater reach by the Katzar than the Aroch. Therefore, Rishonim like the [[Tur]] never saw the Bayit HaAroch.<ref>Beit Yosef (Yoreh Deah 112), Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Kuf 93, Taf 39), Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition.</ref>
# The [[Ra'ah]] wrote a critique of Torat HaBayit known as Bedek HaBayit.
# The [[Ra'ah]] wrote a critique of Torat HaBayit known as Bedek HaBayit.
# The Mishmeret HaBayit was written by the Rashba to defend himself against the Ra'ah,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 4). The Chida (Shem HaGedolim, Gedolim, Shin 19) adds that many Gedolim missed this point while they were engrossed in their learning.</ref> but it wasn't in print at the times of the [[Beit Yosef]], [[Rama]], and [[Maharshal]] for them to see it.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Shin 19), Matnat Yado fn. 10. See Birkei Yosef (Orach Chaim 158:3) for example.</ref>
# The Mishmeret HaBayit, which anonymously defends the Torat HaBayit from the Bedek HaBayit's refutations, was written by the Rashba to defend himself against the Ra'ah,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRashba 4). The Chida (Shem HaGedolim, Gedolim, Shin 19) adds that many Gedolim missed this point while they were engrossed in their learning.</ref> but it wasn't in print at the times of the [[Beit Yosef]], [[Rama]], and [[Maharshal]] for them to see it.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Shin 19), Matnat Yado fn. 10. See Birkei Yosef (Orach Chaim 158:3) for example.</ref>


=Avodat HaKodesh=
=Avodat HaKodesh=