Pesukei DeZimrah: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Interruptions between Yishtabach and Brachot Yotzer
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
== Interruptions between Yishtabach and Brachot Yotzer== | == Interruptions between Yishtabach and Brachot Yotzer== | ||
# One can answer any dvar sh’bekedusha, including Baruch Hu UBaruch Shemo.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:16. In footnote 24, the overwhelming consensus of the achronim was not to say Baruch Hu UBaruch Shemo in Pesukei DeZimrah. However, the Tur 54 in name of Rav Amram Goan says that one can interrupt between Yishtabach and Yotzer for a public need or to distribute charity against the Hagahot Miymoni Tefilah 7:12 in name of the Yerushalmi that it is an Averah to speak in between Yishtabach and Yotzer. Shulchan Aruch 54:3 quotes both of the above opinions. The Rama ibid writes that one can interrupt for blessing the sick or accepting someone for a court case since they are tzorech mitzvah, so holds Sh”t Meharshal 64. Similarly, the minhag is to say Shir HaMaalot during Asert Yeme Teshuva based on the Arizal (Darush L’Rosh Hashana 90a). Therefore, one should be able to answer Baruch Hu Ubaruch Shemo so hold Sh”t Rabbi Eliyahu Hamway 167c | # One can answer any dvar sh’bekedusha, including Baruch Hu UBaruch Shemo.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:16. In footnote 24, the overwhelming consensus of the achronim was not to say Baruch Hu UBaruch Shemo in Pesukei DeZimrah. However, the Tur 54 in name of Rav Amram Goan says that one can interrupt between Yishtabach and Yotzer for a public need or to distribute charity against the Hagahot Miymoni Tefilah 7:12 in name of the Yerushalmi that it is an Averah to speak in between Yishtabach and Yotzer. Shulchan Aruch 54:3 quotes both of the above opinions. The Rama ibid writes that one can interrupt for blessing the sick or accepting someone for a court case since they are tzorech mitzvah, so holds Sh”t Meharshal 64. Similarly, the minhag is to say Shir HaMaalot during Asert Yeme Teshuva based on the Arizal (Darush L’Rosh Hashana 90a). Therefore, one should be able to answer Baruch Hu Ubaruch Shemo so hold Sh”t Rabbi Eliyahu Hamway 167c s.v. UMekol Makom, Taharat Mayim 70:90, Lechem Shlomo O”C 36, Halichot Olam 1 pg 81, Sh”t Yechave Daat 4:9, against the Sh”t Peni Yitzchak 5 pg 170d. See further in Sh”t Shuirei Tahara 2:36, Sh”t Lev Chaim 2:109, Sh”t Kinyan Torah 3:91(3)</ref> | ||
# One can answer the [[Kedusha]] with the entire passage of “nakdishach” or “nekadesh”.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:15. Shulchan Aruch 66:3 says one in [[Kriyat Shema]] one can interrupt for [[Kaddish]], [[Kedusha]] and Baruchu. Since whether one should say the entire passage is a dispute in a place where one can not interrupt one should not say the entire passage. This is the opinion of the Kaf Hachaim of Rabbi Chaim Sofer 66:18 citing some achronim. However, interruptions between Yishtabach and Birchat Yotzer are treated leniently as in footnote 44 and so one can answer the entire passage. </ref> | # One can answer the [[Kedusha]] with the entire passage of “nakdishach” or “nekadesh”.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:15. Shulchan Aruch 66:3 says one in [[Kriyat Shema]] one can interrupt for [[Kaddish]], [[Kedusha]] and Baruchu. Since whether one should say the entire passage is a dispute in a place where one can not interrupt one should not say the entire passage. This is the opinion of the Kaf Hachaim of Rabbi Chaim Sofer 66:18 citing some achronim. However, interruptions between Yishtabach and Birchat Yotzer are treated leniently as in footnote 44 and so one can answer the entire passage. </ref> | ||
# One can answer the entire Modim Derabanan.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:18. Interruptions between Yishtabach and Birchat Yotzer are treated leniently as in footnote 44. </ref> | # One can answer the entire Modim Derabanan.<Ref> Halacha Brurah 51:18. Interruptions between Yishtabach and Birchat Yotzer are treated leniently as in footnote 44. </ref> | ||
