Pesukei DeZimrah: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→If one made an interruption
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
# Even though one isn’t obligated to interrupt even for the Dvarim Shebekedusha that are permitted to answer it’s proper to interrupt for them; initially one should place oneself in a place that he can’t hear the Dvarim Shebekedusha so won’t have to answer. <Ref> Seemingly this should depend on the dispute of the rishonim whether Osek Min Hamitzvah Patur Min Hamitzvah applies if you are able to fulfill both mitzvot. However one could argue here there’s more of a reason one’s chayav as the interruption is also a praise of Hashem and part of the mitzvah you’re involved in. On the other hand, one could argue that one should be exempt as it’s an interruption of his thought in Pesukei DeZimrah. Some hold it’s not an obligation and is just optional including Sh”t Mayim Rabim O”C 2, Torat Chaim Sofer 66:8, Sh”t Vayechi Yacov O”C 4 in name of Rav Chaim Berlin, Sh”t Yad Eliyahu Mekalish 9e, Sh”t Yabia Omer 5:13(5-6),6:21(3), Halacha Brurah 51:31. However Sh”t Nishmat Kol Chai 4 pg 9a, Sh”t Shalmat Chaim Zonenfeld O”C 49 holds one must answer not to be separating from the tzibbur but Sh”t Yabia Omer 1:5(7) argues on this. </ref> | # Even though one isn’t obligated to interrupt even for the Dvarim Shebekedusha that are permitted to answer it’s proper to interrupt for them; initially one should place oneself in a place that he can’t hear the Dvarim Shebekedusha so won’t have to answer. <Ref> Seemingly this should depend on the dispute of the rishonim whether Osek Min Hamitzvah Patur Min Hamitzvah applies if you are able to fulfill both mitzvot. However one could argue here there’s more of a reason one’s chayav as the interruption is also a praise of Hashem and part of the mitzvah you’re involved in. On the other hand, one could argue that one should be exempt as it’s an interruption of his thought in Pesukei DeZimrah. Some hold it’s not an obligation and is just optional including Sh”t Mayim Rabim O”C 2, Torat Chaim Sofer 66:8, Sh”t Vayechi Yacov O”C 4 in name of Rav Chaim Berlin, Sh”t Yad Eliyahu Mekalish 9e, Sh”t Yabia Omer 5:13(5-6),6:21(3), Halacha Brurah 51:31. However Sh”t Nishmat Kol Chai 4 pg 9a, Sh”t Shalmat Chaim Zonenfeld O”C 49 holds one must answer not to be separating from the tzibbur but Sh”t Yabia Omer 1:5(7) argues on this. </ref> | ||
===If one made an interruption=== | ===If one made an interruption=== | ||
# After the fact, if one did interrupt during Pesukei DeZimrah with talking unrelated to [[prayer]], according to Sephardim, one does not repeat the bracha (Baruch Sh’amar) again.<Ref> | # After the fact, if one did interrupt during Pesukei DeZimrah with talking unrelated to [[prayer]], according to Sephardim, one does not repeat the bracha (Baruch Sh’amar) again.<Ref> Rashi in [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=8962&pgnum=347 Pardes Hagadol 5] writes that if someone interrupts between the pesukim of Pesukei DeZimrah and Yishtabach it invalidates the Baruch Sh'amar, implying that it should be repeated. Explicitly, [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=1640&pgnum=58 Sh”t Ginat Veradim OC 1:52] ruled that if one interrupted in middle of Pesukei DeZimrah one should repeat Baruch Sh'amar since Pesukei DeZimrah is one package with brachot before and afterwards. [https://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=547&st=&pgnum=34 Zachur Lyitzchak 11d] limits this; only if one interrupted between Baruch Sh'amar and starting Pesukei DeZimrah should one repeat Baruch Sh'amar. Mishna Brurah 51:4 agrees. Pri Megadim E"A 51:3 also writes this ruling that interrupting between Baruch Sh'amar and starting Pesukei Dezimrah would require repeating Baruch Sh'amar but leaves it unresolved. | ||
* Halacha Brurah in Birur Halacha 51:3 quotes the Rashbetz in name of the Geonim that speech is not an interruption to answer a greeting of anyone or to greet someone who demands respect during Pesukei DeZimrah even between Baruch Sh’amar and the zemirot; and does not effect the bracha. He supports this ruling from the Perach Soshan O”C klal 1:15, Korban Esheh O”C 2, Taharat HaMayim (Shuri Tahara Merechet 40:47), Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:5(3), Minchat Aharon 12:3e, and Kaf Hachaim 51:7 based on Shulchan Aruch O.C. 51:4. Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:5(3) writes that had the Mishna Brurah and others seen the Rashbetz in the name of the Geonim they would have retracted their positions. </ref> According to Ashkenazim, if one spoke between Baruch Sh'amar and Hodu it is possible that one should repeat Baruch Sh'amar.<ref>Mishna Brurah 51:4</ref> | |||
===Answering Amen=== | ===Answering Amen=== | ||
