16,374
edits
Muktzeh Machmat Gufo: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m
Text replace - "Shabbat" to "Shabbat"
No edit summary |
m (Text replace - "Shabbat" to "Shabbat") |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* bars of soap <ref> Sh”t Igrot Moshe 5:22(15), Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach in Tikkunim UMiluim (pg 32), and Rav Elyashiv in Shalmei Yehuda (pg 158) all consider a bar of soap to be Muktzeh Machmat Gufo</ref> | * bars of soap <ref> Sh”t Igrot Moshe 5:22(15), Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach in Tikkunim UMiluim (pg 32), and Rav Elyashiv in Shalmei Yehuda (pg 158) all consider a bar of soap to be Muktzeh Machmat Gufo</ref> | ||
* battery <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 61) quoting Rav Elyashiv says that batteries are considered Muktzeh Machmat Gufo and in extenuating circumstances can be considered Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur </ref> | * battery <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 61) quoting Rav Elyashiv says that batteries are considered Muktzeh Machmat Gufo and in extenuating circumstances can be considered Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur </ref> | ||
* bicycles <ref> Sefer Tiltulei Shabbat (pg 24) in name of Rav Moshe Feinstein </ref> | * bicycles <ref> Sefer Tiltulei [[Shabbat]] (pg 24) in name of Rav Moshe Feinstein </ref> | ||
* board of wood <ref>Magan Avraham 308:18, Mishna Brurah 308:34 writes that many people aren’t aware of this prohibition to use a board to lock the door or another purpose unless it was designated permanently or made some action to fix it before Shabbat. </ref> | * board of wood <ref>Magan Avraham 308:18, Mishna Brurah 308:34 writes that many people aren’t aware of this prohibition to use a board to lock the door or another purpose unless it was designated permanently or made some action to fix it before [[Shabbat]]. </ref> | ||
* cameras <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * cameras <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* coins <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | * coins <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* flour <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * flour <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* glue <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * glue <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* insecticides <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 164), Menuchat Shabbat 88:7, Brit Olam (Muktzeh Machmat Gufo#33), Sefer Tiltulei Shabbat (pg 30) </ref> | * insecticides <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 164), Menuchat [[Shabbat]] 88:7, Brit Olam (Muktzeh Machmat Gufo#33), Sefer Tiltulei [[Shabbat]] (pg 30) </ref> | ||
* lantern (metal) <ref>Magan Avraham 308:18, Mishna Brurah 308:34 </ref> | * lantern (metal) <ref>Magan Avraham 308:18, Mishna Brurah 308:34 </ref> | ||
* light bulbs <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * light bulbs <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* money <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * money <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* nutshells <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * nutshells <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* plastic tablecloth rolls <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 98) rules that since a roll of plastic tablecloth roll is unusable and it’s forbidden to rip it on Shabbat the roll is totally Muktzeh Machmat Gufo. </ref> | * plastic tablecloth rolls <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 98) rules that since a roll of plastic tablecloth roll is unusable and it’s forbidden to rip it on [[Shabbat]] the roll is totally Muktzeh Machmat Gufo. </ref> | ||
* raw barley <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * raw barley <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* rock <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | * rock <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* sand <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | * sand <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | ||
* shaanetz clothes <ref> S”A 308:47 </ref> | * shaanetz clothes <ref> S”A 308:47 </ref> | ||
* spray paint <ref> Tiltulei Shabbat (pg 30) </ref> | * spray paint <ref> Tiltulei [[Shabbat]] (pg 30) </ref> | ||
* tin-foil roll <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 98) rules that since a roll of tin-foil is unusable and it’s forbidden to rip it on Shabbat the roll is totally Muktzeh Machmat Gufo. </ref> | * tin-foil roll <ref> Shalmei Yehuda (pg 98) rules that since a roll of tin-foil is unusable and it’s forbidden to rip it on [[Shabbat]] the roll is totally Muktzeh Machmat Gufo. </ref> | ||
* used matches <ref> Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 308:100) </ref> | * used matches <ref> Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 308:100) </ref> | ||
* Vaseline <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * Vaseline <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
# If there’s a need one may push animal from behind. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:152 </ref> | # If there’s a need one may push animal from behind. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 308:152 </ref> | ||
==Forbidden objects== | ==Forbidden objects== | ||
# Shanez clothing are Muktzah Machmat Gufo. <Ref> S”A 307:47 quotes two opinions and sides with those who are lenient, however, Mishna Brurah 308:161 holds like the strict opinion. </ref> However Shanez clothes of a non-Jew aren’t Muktzeh unless the non-Jew gives a Jew a collateral of Shanez clothes. <Ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:37 based on S”A HaRav writes that Shanez of a non-Jew isn’t muktzah. However, Mishna Brurah 308:161 (quoted in Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata’s footnote there) writes that a non-goy who gives a Jew a collateral of Shanez clothes is Muktzeh. Muktzah: A Practial Guide (by Rabbi Simcha Bunim Cohen; pg 107) rules that Shaatnez clothes are Muktzah Machmat Gufo. </ref> | # Shanez clothing are Muktzah Machmat Gufo. <Ref> S”A 307:47 quotes two opinions and sides with those who are lenient, however, Mishna Brurah 308:161 holds like the strict opinion. </ref> However Shanez clothes of a non-Jew aren’t Muktzeh unless the non-Jew gives a Jew a collateral of Shanez clothes. <Ref>Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:37 based on S”A HaRav writes that Shanez of a non-Jew isn’t muktzah. However, Mishna Brurah 308:161 (quoted in Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata’s footnote there) writes that a non-goy who gives a Jew a collateral of Shanez clothes is Muktzeh. Muktzah: A Practial Guide (by Rabbi Simcha Bunim Cohen; pg 107) rules that Shaatnez clothes are Muktzah Machmat Gufo. </ref> | ||
==Designation of an object for a purpose== | ==Designation of an object for a purpose== | ||
# Items which are not normally used for a permissible purpose such as rock <ref> S”A 308:22 writes that there’s a distinction whether the object is normally used for a permissible purpose or not. This is also evident in Mishna Brurah 308:87 and 92. </ref> one needs to make a permanent designation or a physical action to fix it for that permissible use (like organizing rocks in order to sit on). <Ref>S”A 308:21 writes that rocks which are Muktzeh Machmat Gufo a designation doesn’t work to make it non-Muktzeh rather an action is needed such as organizing the rocks. Rama 308:21 writes that rocks only need a designation. Mishna Brurah 308:90 writes the consensus of the achronim is to hold like S”A. </ref> | # Items which are not normally used for a permissible purpose such as rock <ref> S”A 308:22 writes that there’s a distinction whether the object is normally used for a permissible purpose or not. This is also evident in Mishna Brurah 308:87 and 92. </ref> one needs to make a permanent designation or a physical action to fix it for that permissible use (like organizing rocks in order to sit on). <Ref>S”A 308:21 writes that rocks which are Muktzeh Machmat Gufo a designation doesn’t work to make it non-Muktzeh rather an action is needed such as organizing the rocks. Rama 308:21 writes that rocks only need a designation. Mishna Brurah 308:90 writes the consensus of the achronim is to hold like S”A. </ref> | ||
# However, something which sometimes is used for a permissible purpose only needs a mental designation <ref>Mishna Brurah 308:85 and 93 write that a mental designation is sufficient and verbal one isn’t necessary </ref>, which should be a permanent designation, but in cases of need it’s sufficient to have a designation for that Shabbat alone. <ref>S”A 308:22 quotes three opinions regarding an object that’s normally used for permissible purposes; some say a designation for that Shabbat alone is a designation, some say a permanent designation, and some say an action is necessary. S”A quotes the first opinion as the main (anonymous) opinion. Mishna Brurah 307:97 writes that in conclusion if there’s a need a designation for one Shabbat is sufficient. Mishna Brurah 308:86 writes that unlike S”A the Eliyah Rabba holds that a designation just for the weekday isn’t a designation rather a designation for that Shabbat is needed. </ref>Using that object for a permissible purpose before Shabbat is the equivalent of a designation and it wouldn’t be Muktzeh. <Ref>S”A 308:22 writes that sitting on the sticks on wood or tying them together is a sufficient designation. Mishna Brurah 308:83 and 85 explain that an action expresses one’s intent to use it for a permissible purpose. </ref> | # However, something which sometimes is used for a permissible purpose only needs a mental designation <ref>Mishna Brurah 308:85 and 93 write that a mental designation is sufficient and verbal one isn’t necessary </ref>, which should be a permanent designation, but in cases of need it’s sufficient to have a designation for that [[Shabbat]] alone. <ref>S”A 308:22 quotes three opinions regarding an object that’s normally used for permissible purposes; some say a designation for that [[Shabbat]] alone is a designation, some say a permanent designation, and some say an action is necessary. S”A quotes the first opinion as the main (anonymous) opinion. Mishna Brurah 307:97 writes that in conclusion if there’s a need a designation for one [[Shabbat]] is sufficient. Mishna Brurah 308:86 writes that unlike S”A the Eliyah Rabba holds that a designation just for the weekday isn’t a designation rather a designation for that [[Shabbat]] is needed. </ref>Using that object for a permissible purpose before [[Shabbat]] is the equivalent of a designation and it wouldn’t be Muktzeh. <Ref>S”A 308:22 writes that sitting on the sticks on wood or tying them together is a sufficient designation. Mishna Brurah 308:83 and 85 explain that an action expresses one’s intent to use it for a permissible purpose. </ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
