16,374
edits
Muktzeh Machmat Gufo: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Examples
(→Foods) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
* dirt <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | * dirt <ref>Mishna Brurah (Intro to 308) </ref> | ||
* eye-shadow <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * eye-shadow <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* feces<ref>Is soeh of a person muktzeh? Gemara Shabbat 121b explicates that human feces aren’t muktzeh since it is edible to dogs. However, the Rif 45b, Rosh 16:11, and Rambam don’t cite this leniency. Therefore, the Ran, Ritva, and Rashba conclude that it is muktzeh since they don’t cite this part of the gemara. Shulchan Aruch O.C. 308:34 is strict. Magen Avraham 308:59 notes that these rishonim don’t cite our version of the gemara. Why would the Rif and Rosh hold it isn’t muktzeh? Rashba 121b s.v. hachi explains that it is muktzeh as nolad. Ritva Meyuchas Lran 121b s.v. soeh explains that since it isn’t certain that a person is going to go to the bathroom on Shabbat it is nolad. Ritva 121b s.v. girsat explains that even if it is certain it is still completely nolad. Levush cited by the Pri Megadim E”A 308:59 explains that it is completely miyus and wouldn’t give it to the dogs either way.</ref> | |||
* flour <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * flour <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
* glue <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | * glue <ref> The Weekly Halacha Discussion (vol 2 pg 337) </ref> | ||
