16,374
edits
Milk and Meat in the Kitchen: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Soaking as a Form of Cooking
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
# If a prohibited item was soaking together with a permitted item in a liquid for 24 hours the permitted item is. If it was there for less than 24 hours it is sufficient to just wash off the permitted item. <ref>Shulchan Aruch YD 105:1</ref> | # If a prohibited item was soaking together with a permitted item in a liquid for 24 hours the permitted item is. If it was there for less than 24 hours it is sufficient to just wash off the permitted item. <ref>Shulchan Aruch YD 105:1</ref> | ||
# If it soaked for 24 hours non-consecutively, such for 23 hours and then for another hour, after the fact most poskim assume that it is permitted.<ref>Kaf HaChaim 105:6</ref> | # If it soaked for 24 hours non-consecutively, such for 23 hours and then for another hour, after the fact most poskim assume that it is permitted.<ref>Kaf HaChaim 105:6</ref> | ||
# If a prohibited item was soaking in a pot for 24 hours, the pot absorbed the prohibited taste and would need to be koshered. <ref>Kaf HaChaim 105:1</ref> | # If a prohibited item was soaking in a pot for 24 hours, the pot absorbed the prohibited taste and would need to be koshered.<ref>Taz 105:1, Shach 98:13, Badei Hashulchan 105:3, Kaf HaChaim 105:1. Taz thinks that the absorption is only as deep as a klipa, while the Shach thinks it is completely absorbed.</ref> There is a discussion if metal and glass pots absorb taste through soaking.<ref>[https://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=15006&st=&pgnum=172 Yad Yehuda 105:1] is lenient on metal and glass not absorbing taste through soaking. See Darkei Teshuva 105:11 for discussion.</ref> | ||
# If a permitted item was soaking in a non-kosher pot for 24 hours, after the fact the food is kosher according to most opinions, yet a person should only be lenient in cases of great loss. <ref>The Shach 105:2 and Taz 105:1 argue that it is permitted since by the time that the forbidden taste can be absorbed into the permitted food the taste in the pot is already considered ruined. The Kaf HaChaim 105:3 writes that because it is a dispute and the Pri Chadash holds like the Isur Veheter a person should only be lenient in cases of great loss. The Laws of Kashrut (p. 269) seems to side with the opinion of the Shach but advises asking a rabbi.</ref> | # If a permitted item was soaking in a non-kosher pot for 24 hours, after the fact the food is kosher according to most opinions, yet a person should only be lenient in cases of great loss. <ref>The Shach 105:2 and Taz 105:1 argue that it is permitted since by the time that the forbidden taste can be absorbed into the permitted food the taste in the pot is already considered ruined. The Kaf HaChaim 105:3 writes that because it is a dispute and the Pri Chadash holds like the Isur Veheter a person should only be lenient in cases of great loss. The Laws of Kashrut (p. 269) seems to side with the opinion of the Shach but advises asking a rabbi.</ref> | ||
==Inedible Foods== | ==Inedible Foods== | ||
