Anonymous

Maror: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
2 bytes removed ,  16 September 2014
m
Text replace - "Mishnah Berurah" to "Mishna Brurah"
No edit summary
m (Text replace - "Mishnah Berurah" to "Mishna Brurah")
Line 8: Line 8:
# The Maror should be dipped into the Charoset. One should wipe off the charoset and not dip it for too long otherwise it’ll remove the taste of the Maror. <Ref>S”A 475:1 </ref> Some only dip it partially. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 475:13 </ref>
# The Maror should be dipped into the Charoset. One should wipe off the charoset and not dip it for too long otherwise it’ll remove the taste of the Maror. <Ref>S”A 475:1 </ref> Some only dip it partially. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 475:13 </ref>
==Leaning==
==Leaning==
# One doesn’t have to lean when eating the Maror <Ref>S”A 475:1 </ref> but if one wants to one may do so. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 475:14. Magen Avraham (475:6) writes that if one did indeed lean while eating maror one nonetheless fulfills his obligation. Rabbi Shmuel Loew in Machatzit Ha-Shekel finds support for this from the fact that Hillel must have leaned while eating maror since he ate it together with the matzah. However, Mishnah Berurah (475:14) writes that if one so desires one may lean while eating the maror. Rabbi Hezekiah Silva in Pri Chadash (475:1) defends this approach by arguing that leaning is not a contradiction to slavery, for after all even the matzah and the first two cups of wine serve as partial symbols of slavery and are nevertheless leaned for. </ref>
# One doesn’t have to lean when eating the Maror <Ref>S”A 475:1 </ref> but if one wants to one may do so. <Ref>Mishna Brurah 475:14. Magen Avraham (475:6) writes that if one did indeed lean while eating maror one nonetheless fulfills his obligation. Rabbi Shmuel Loew in Machatzit Ha-Shekel finds support for this from the fact that Hillel must have leaned while eating maror since he ate it together with the matzah. However, Mishna Brurah (475:14) writes that if one so desires one may lean while eating the maror. Rabbi Hezekiah Silva in Pri Chadash (475:1) defends this approach by arguing that leaning is not a contradiction to slavery, for after all even the matzah and the first two cups of wine serve as partial symbols of slavery and are nevertheless leaned for. </ref>


==Sources==
==Sources==