16,374
edits
Making a New Bracha on Tzitzit: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
Making a New Bracha on Tzitzit (view source)
Revision as of 03:51, 10 October 2013
, 10 October 2013Text replace - "Yabea Omer" to "Yabia Omer"
m (Text replace - "Talit" to "Talit") |
m (Text replace - "Yabea Omer" to "Yabia Omer") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Rav Shlomo Zalman in Halichot Shlomo 3:7 writes that one should only make a new bracha is the tzitzit were removed for 3 hours. However, the footnote there clarifies that this number isn't exact. See also Rav Moshe Shternbach in Teshuvot VeHanhagot 1:32 who writes that one should make a new Bracha only if it has been an hour or two and one also left the house or building one was in. | * Rav Shlomo Zalman in Halichot Shlomo 3:7 writes that one should only make a new bracha is the tzitzit were removed for 3 hours. However, the footnote there clarifies that this number isn't exact. See also Rav Moshe Shternbach in Teshuvot VeHanhagot 1:32 who writes that one should make a new Bracha only if it has been an hour or two and one also left the house or building one was in. | ||
* Ezor Yisrael (pg 39) writes that if you do a significant activity one should make a new Bracha, but if it’s a transitory activity, no new Bracha is required. Similarly, Piskei Teshuvot 8:23 concludes that if it’s a activity with a defined time limit, then no new Bracha is required, however if the activity doesn't have a definite time limit or one tarries after that activity, a new Bracha is required. </ref> | * Ezor Yisrael (pg 39) writes that if you do a significant activity one should make a new Bracha, but if it’s a transitory activity, no new Bracha is required. Similarly, Piskei Teshuvot 8:23 concludes that if it’s a activity with a defined time limit, then no new Bracha is required, however if the activity doesn't have a definite time limit or one tarries after that activity, a new Bracha is required. </ref> | ||
# Sephardim should follow the opinion of that defines a short period as a half hour. <ref> Sh”t | # Sephardim should follow the opinion of that defines a short period as a half hour. <ref> Sh”t Yabia Omer 8:2(4), Yalkut Yosef (Tzitzit pg 222), Sh”t Or Letzion 2:44(10), Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:28 </ref> | ||
==Examples of momentarily== | ==Examples of momentarily== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
# If one removes the talit with explicit intent not to put it back on for a while or not at all, a new Bracha is needed even if one put it back on right away. <Ref> Magan Avraham 8:18, Mishna Brurah 8:37, Sh”t Bear Moshe 6:4(10), Piskei Teshuvot 8:23(4), Ezor Yisrael 8:14 </ref> | # If one removes the talit with explicit intent not to put it back on for a while or not at all, a new Bracha is needed even if one put it back on right away. <Ref> Magan Avraham 8:18, Mishna Brurah 8:37, Sh”t Bear Moshe 6:4(10), Piskei Teshuvot 8:23(4), Ezor Yisrael 8:14 </ref> | ||
## If one removes one’s talit in order to put on another talit and then changes his mind, a new Bracha is needed <ref> artzot hachaim, [[Tzitzit]] by Rav tzvi Kohen 8:71 </ref> | ## If one removes one’s talit in order to put on another talit and then changes his mind, a new Bracha is needed <ref> artzot hachaim, [[Tzitzit]] by Rav tzvi Kohen 8:71 </ref> | ||
## If one changes talit’s a new Bracha is needed if one didn’t have that new one in mind when one made the Bracha in the morning. <Ref> S”A 8:12 writes that if one has many pairs of clothes with [[Tzitzit]] one must make a Bracha on each one unless one had intention to where all of them. Mishna Brurah 8:32 explains that if one didn’t have explicit intention, one must make another Bracha for each one. Almost all achronim write this distinction of switching two pairs of [[Tzitzit]] (where one surely makes a new Bracha) and removing one and replacing it after time (where there’s a dispute) including Sh”t Divrei Shmuel 1, Sh”t Teshurat Shai 133, Pri HaSadeh 4:64 (it’s regarding Tefillin, but references [[Talit]]), Artzot HaChaim, Sh”t | ## If one changes talit’s a new Bracha is needed if one didn’t have that new one in mind when one made the Bracha in the morning. <Ref> S”A 8:12 writes that if one has many pairs of clothes with [[Tzitzit]] one must make a Bracha on each one unless one had intention to where all of them. Mishna Brurah 8:32 explains that if one didn’t have explicit intention, one must make another Bracha for each one. Almost all achronim write this distinction of switching two pairs of [[Tzitzit]] (where one surely makes a new Bracha) and removing one and replacing it after time (where there’s a dispute) including Sh”t Divrei Shmuel 1, Sh”t Teshurat Shai 133, Pri HaSadeh 4:64 (it’s regarding Tefillin, but references [[Talit]]), Artzot HaChaim, Sh”t Yabia Omer Y”D 3:17(2), [[Tzitzit]] Halacha Pesuka (by Rav Tzvi Cohen 8:79), Piskei Teshuvot 8:23(8). See Sh”t Rivovot Efraim 1:23 and Sh”t Bear Moshe 6:4. </ref> | ||
## Therefore, when switching Tzitzit’s on Friday for [[Shabbat]], if when donning the weekday pair in the morning that it should cover the [[Shabbat]] pair, one doesn’t need a new Bracha, however if one didn’t have this intent, a new Bracha is needed. If one’s normal practice is to switch into a [[Shabbat]] pair, even stam intent is enough to cover that pair, and no new Bracha is needed. <ref> See above note. Leket Kemach Hachadash 73, and Torat Chaim Sofer 23 write explicitly regarding this case that a new Bracha should be made. However, [[Tzitzit]] Halacha Pesuka (by Rav Tzvi Cohen 8:79 in the footnote) writes that the Chazon Ish didn’t make a new bracha, and he quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky who explained that it was for the reason that the Chazon Ish didn’t want to make a Bracha on a talit katan. </ref> | ## Therefore, when switching Tzitzit’s on Friday for [[Shabbat]], if when donning the weekday pair in the morning that it should cover the [[Shabbat]] pair, one doesn’t need a new Bracha, however if one didn’t have this intent, a new Bracha is needed. If one’s normal practice is to switch into a [[Shabbat]] pair, even stam intent is enough to cover that pair, and no new Bracha is needed. <ref> See above note. Leket Kemach Hachadash 73, and Torat Chaim Sofer 23 write explicitly regarding this case that a new Bracha should be made. However, [[Tzitzit]] Halacha Pesuka (by Rav Tzvi Cohen 8:79 in the footnote) writes that the Chazon Ish didn’t make a new bracha, and he quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky who explained that it was for the reason that the Chazon Ish didn’t want to make a Bracha on a talit katan. </ref> | ||
## If one removed a talit in Davening by accident thinking that Davening was over, a new Bracha is needed. <ref> Daat Torah, Tzitizit Halacha Pesuka by Rav tzvi Kohen 8:76 </ref> | ## If one removed a talit in Davening by accident thinking that Davening was over, a new Bracha is needed. <ref> Daat Torah, Tzitizit Halacha Pesuka by Rav tzvi Kohen 8:76 </ref> | ||
