Anonymous

Kotaiv: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
368 bytes removed ,  21 October 2013
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:


# Many poskim hold that it is permitted to open a book on [[Shabbat]] even though it has letters or pictures on the side of the pages of the book; if, however, there is another similar book available without letters on the side, one should use that one.  Also, it’s preferable not to write on the sides of books in order to avoid this issue. <Ref> Birkei Yosef 340:5, Leviat Chen 120, Sh"t Tzitz Eliezer 13:44, Vayesh Moshe 1:65, Mishna Berura 340:17.
# Many poskim hold that it is permitted to open a book on [[Shabbat]] even though it has letters or pictures on the side of the pages of the book; if, however, there is another similar book available without letters on the side, one should use that one.  Also, it’s preferable not to write on the sides of books in order to avoid this issue. <Ref> Birkei Yosef 340:5, Leviat Chen 120, Sh"t Tzitz Eliezer 13:44, Vayesh Moshe 1:65, Mishna Berura 340:17.
* '''This footnote requires further editing'''
* The Levush 340:4 writes that it is a Torah violation to open or close a book with words stamped on the sides of the pages. He maintains that opening the book is [[erasing]] because the letters are broken, and then closing the book again is writing because the letters are reformed. Magen Avraham 340:6 and Chazon Ish 61:1 are machmir for this Levush.
* The Levush 340:4 writes that it is forbidden to open or close a book with letters written on the side because when one opens the book, the letters are broken and when the book is closed the letters are reformed. He adds that perhaps there is a biblical prohibition, since [[erasing]], accomplished by opening of the book, is done with the intent of later writing in that place when closing the book.
* The Levush 340:4 writes that it is a torah violation to open or close a book with words stamped on the sides of the pages. Opening the book is [[erasing]] and then closing the book again is writing. Magen Avraham 340:6 and Chazon Ish 61:1 are machmir for this Levush.  
* The Rama in a teshuva (119), however, is lenient based on the Gemara [[Shabbat]] (104b) that says that there is a biblical prohibition if a person writes one letter in Tiveriya and one in Tzipori because it is not considered lacking a significant action to bring them together. The Rama infers that moving letters closer to or further from one another is not considered writing or [[erasing]]. Similarly, opening the book doesn’t erase the letters, but merely separates the parts of the letters, and closing the book doesn’t write the letters, but just combines the halves.
* The Rama in a teshuva (119), however, is lenient based on the Gemara [[Shabbat]] (104b) that says that there is a biblical prohibition if a person writes one letter in Tiveriya and one in Tzipori because it is not considered lacking a significant action to bring them together. The Rama infers that moving letters closer to or further from one another is not considered writing or [[erasing]]. Similarly, opening the book doesn’t erase the letters, but merely separates the parts of the letters, and closing the book doesn’t write the letters, but just combines the halves.
* The Avnei Neizer 210:1-3 rejects this proof. He argues that [[separating]] two letters isn’t considered [[erasing]] because the letters still exist, but splitting letters horizontally is considered [[erasing]] because the letters become nonexistent. See Rama (ibid.) and Taz 340:2 for resolutions to this difficulty.
* The Avnei Neizer 210:1-3 rejects this proof. He argues that [[separating]] two letters isn’t considered [[erasing]] because the letters still exist, but splitting letters horizontally is considered [[erasing]] because the letters become nonexistent. See Rama (ibid.) and Taz 340:2 for resolutions to this difficulty.