Anonymous

Kotaiv: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
907 bytes added ,  18 October 2013
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Writing on Shabbat]] is one of the 39 primary melachot of [[Shabbat]]. <ref> Mishna [[Shabbat]] 7:2 Daf 73a. Rashi 73a says that writing is counted among the melachot because in the mishkan they would write on each board of the Mishkan in order to return it to its correct place whenever the Mishkan was reassembled </ref> The topic of [[erasing on Shabbat]] is dealt with on a its own page.
[[Writing on Shabbat]] is one of the 39 primary melachot of [[Shabbat]]. <ref> Mishna [[Shabbat]] 7:2, Daf 73a. Rashi 73a says that writing is counted among the melachot because in the mishkan they would write on each board of the Mishkan in order to return it to its correct place whenever the Mishkan was reassembled </ref> The topic of [[erasing on Shabbat]] is dealt with on a its own page.
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
# One who writes two letters on [[shabbat]] is chayav for the melacha of kotaiv, but if one letter is significant enough that qualifies as well. <ref> Mishna in Masechet [[Shabbat]] 73a writes that the prohibited melacha is for two letters but the gemara 104b says if it is one letter that finishes off the book, you are also obligated. The Avnei Nezer 201 explains that this is because it gives it significance. </ref>     
# One who writes two letters on [[shabbat]] is chayav for the melacha of kotaiv, but if one letter is significant enough that qualifies as well. <ref> Mishna in Masechet [[Shabbat]] 73a writes that the prohibited melacha is for two letters but the gemara 104b says if it is one letter that finishes off the book, you are also obligated. The Avnei Nezer 201 explains that this is because it gives it significance. </ref>     
Line 26: Line 26:
# If letters or pictures are written on the side of pages of a book, many authorities hold that there is what to rely on to open and close the book. However, it’s correct to use another copy of the same book if that is available. Also, it’s preferable not to write on the sides of books in order to avoid this issue.  <Ref> Birkei Yosef 340:5, Leviat Chen 120, Sh"t Tzitz Eliezer 13:44, Vayesh Moshe 1:65, Mishna Berura 340:17.
# If letters or pictures are written on the side of pages of a book, many authorities hold that there is what to rely on to open and close the book. However, it’s correct to use another copy of the same book if that is available. Also, it’s preferable not to write on the sides of books in order to avoid this issue.  <Ref> Birkei Yosef 340:5, Leviat Chen 120, Sh"t Tzitz Eliezer 13:44, Vayesh Moshe 1:65, Mishna Berura 340:17.
* The Levush 340:4 writes that it is a torah violation to open or close a book with words stamped on the sides of the pages. Opening the book is [[erasing]] and then closing the book again is writing. Magen Avraham 340:6 and Chazon Ish 61:1 are machmir for this Levush.  
* The Levush 340:4 writes that it is a torah violation to open or close a book with words stamped on the sides of the pages. Opening the book is [[erasing]] and then closing the book again is writing. Magen Avraham 340:6 and Chazon Ish 61:1 are machmir for this Levush.  
* However, Sh"t Rama 119 and Taz 340:2 disagree saying that bringing existing letters together isn't a melacha and since the book is meant to be open and closed it is like opening and closing a door which is certainly permissible and not an issue of [[boneh]] and soter. Sh"t Har Tzvi Melechet Kotev 4 writes that even the Levush himself agrees that [[seperating]] two complete letters isn't an issue of writing. He is just concerned of joining and [[separating]] letters fragments but not [[separating]] two whole letters.  
* However, Sh"t Rama 119 and Taz 340:2 disagree saying that bringing existing letters together isn't a melacha and since the book is meant to be open and closed it is like opening and closing a door which is certainly permissible and not an issue of [[boneh]] and soter. The Rama's leniency is based on the Gemara [[Shabbat]] (104b) that says that there is a biblical prohibition if a person writes one letter in Tiveriya and one in Tzipori because it is not considered lacking a significant action to bring them together. The Rama infers that moving letters closer to or further from one another is not considered writing or [[erasing]]. Similarly, opening the book doesn’t erase the letters, but merely separates the parts of the letters, and closing the book doesn’t write the letters, but just combines the halves. The Avnei Neizer 210:1-3 rejects this proof. He argues that [[separating]] two letters isn’t considered [[erasing]] because the letters still exist, but splitting letters horizontally is considered [[erasing]] because the letters become nonexistent. See Rama (ibid.) and Taz 340:2 for resolutions to this difficulty. Based on this Avnei Nezer, see also Sh"t Har Tzvi Melechet Kotev 4 writes that even the Levush himself agrees that [[seperating]] two complete letters isn't an issue of writing. He is just concerned of joining and [[separating]] letter fragments but not [[separating]] two whole letters.  
* Therefore Mishna Berura 340:17 rules that although halacha is against the Levush, one should be machmir if he has another book available. </ref>
* Therefore Mishna Berura 340:17 rules that although halacha is against the Levush, one should be machmir if he has another book available. </ref>
# If a page in a book ripped where words are written, it’s permissible to place the pieces next to one another in order to read it, if one doesn’t have another copy of that book. <Ref> Mishnat Halachot vol 6 Siman 89, Sh"t Be'er Moshe 6:125, Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHalichata 28:2, Igrot Moshe Y”D vol 2 Siman 75 D”H “VeDvar HaDaf” </ref>
# If a page in a book ripped where words are written, it’s permissible to place the pieces next to one another in order to read it, if one doesn’t have another copy of that book. <Ref> Mishnat Halachot vol 6 Siman 89, Sh"t Be'er Moshe 6:125, Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHalichata 28:2, Igrot Moshe Y”D vol 2 Siman 75 D”H “VeDvar HaDaf” </ref>