Kosher Wine: Yayin Nesech, Stam Yeinam, and Maga Akum: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (→Who Can Prohibit Wine: ger toshav, gerim, and avadim) |
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) m (→Avadim: typos) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== Avadim == | == Avadim == | ||
# An Eved purchased from a Non-Jew no longer prohibits wine with his touch once he has [[Milah]] and Tevilah even if they don't yet act like Jews and hasn't yet ceased to mention the names of his gods.<ref>Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 124:3</ref> If they did not yet have a Tevilah, the wine they touch would be prohibited from benefit.<ref>Shach Yoreh Deah 124:7, see Biur HaGra Yoreh Deah 124:8</ref> | # An Eved purchased from a Non-Jew no longer prohibits wine with his touch once he has [[Milah]] and Tevilah even if they don't yet act like Jews and hasn't yet ceased to mention the names of his gods.<ref>Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 124:3</ref> If they did not yet have a Tevilah, the wine they touch would be prohibited from benefit.<ref>Shach Yoreh Deah 124:7, see Biur HaGra Yoreh Deah 124:8</ref> | ||
# The adult children born in Jewish dominion to Shefachot who haven't gone to the Mikveh can | # The adult circumcised children born in Jewish dominion to Shefachot who haven't gone to the Mikveh can still prohibit wine from drinking , but the young ones don't even prohibit it at all.<ref>Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 124:4. The Shach Yoreh Deah 124:8 is upset, as the Rambam's words, which are the source for this ruling of Shulchan Aruch, make no mention of drinking; rather, they imply the wine is prohibited from all benefit! Regardless, he concludes that Ashkenazim are lenient nowadays with respect to benefit in cases of loss, so the Halacha is the same. See Biur HaGRA Yoreh Deah 124:9. | ||
The Taz Yoreh Deah 124:3 thinks that even Maga of Ketanim who don't have Milah would be Muttar beShetiah. The Shach Yoreh Deah 124:9 concurs for a different reason.</ref> | The Taz Yoreh Deah 124:3 thinks that even Maga of Ketanim who don't have Milah would be Muttar beShetiah. The Shach Yoreh Deah 124:9 concurs for a different reason.</ref> | ||
# If the Shefachot did go to the Mikveh already, then their children cannot prohibit wine, regardless of age or Milah.<ref>Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 124:5 writes this as a Yesh Mi SheOmer, either because only the Tashbetz (vol. 1 Siman 170) states this seemingly obvious Halacha, or because it would be in opposition to a Ramban in Yevamot (R' Akiva Eiger ad loc.)</ref> | # If the Shefachot did go to the Mikveh already, then their children cannot prohibit wine, regardless of age or Milah.<ref>Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 124:5 writes this as a Yesh Mi SheOmer, either because only the Tashbetz (vol. 1 Siman 170) states this seemingly obvious Halacha, or because it would be in opposition to a Ramban in Yevamot (R' Akiva Eiger ad loc.)</ref> | ||
