Bots, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Suppressors, Administrators, wiki-admin, wiki-controller, wiki-editor, wiki-reader
1,210
edits
Klalei Halacha: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Safek Deoritta Lchumra
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
==Safek Deoritta Lchumra== | ==Safek Deoritta Lchumra== | ||
#Rambam holds that safek deoritta lchumra is only rabbinic and is learned from a derivation the rabbis made regarding mamzer.<Ref>Rambam (Responsa Blau, siman 310). Rav Shlomo Ginzler (Yeshrun p. 34) quotes the fuller text of that teshuva with the line that makes it clear that safek deoritta lchumra is only derabbanan is learned from mamzer vaday v'lo mamzer safek.</ref> | #Rambam holds that safek deoritta lchumra is only rabbinic and is learned from a derivation the rabbis made regarding mamzer.<Ref>Rambam (Responsa Blau, siman 310). Rav Shlomo Ginzler (Yeshrun p. 34) quotes the fuller text of that teshuva with the line that makes it clear that safek deoritta lchumra is only derabbanan is learned from mamzer vaday v'lo mamzer safek.</ref> | ||
#If there's a safek deoritta about the past status of an item, but right now it appears kosher, there's a machloket if that item is permitted.<ref>Taz 201:85 indicates that Ran holds that a mikveh which is not known to leak is kosher if it was known to have 40 seah and currently has 40 seah. Even though it is unknown that there were 40 seah when someone used it in between that is fine since there's no suspicion that it became invalidated. This implies that if it wasn't known to begin with that it had 40 seah it would be an issue. However, Rash Mikvaot 2:1 implies this is permitted. Taz adds that it is possible that even Ran agrees that it is permitted.</ref> | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Rules for Determining Halacha]] | [[Category:Rules for Determining Halacha]] | ||
