1,988
edits
Klalei HaPoskim: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Tur: halacha focus, rashba is rash mishantz sometimes, somech al makom acher
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) m (→Contradictions) |
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (→Tur: halacha focus, rashba is rash mishantz sometimes, somech al makom acher) |
||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
== Tur == | == Tur == | ||
# Like his father the Rosh, the Tur only discusses matters that are relevant to Halacha.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 1)</ref> | |||
# If the position of the Rashba quoted by the Tur contradicts what the Rashba himself writes in his Sefarim, the former is actually the Rash MiShantz, not Rav Shlomo Ben Aderet.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 2)</ref> | |||
# Some say that if the Tur omits a Halacha from its appropriate context, one cannot infer that he still accepts it based on a Halacha written in a different context of the Tur, because this is its proper place. For example, if a certain Halacha about lighting Shabbat candles doesn't appear in the Siman about candlelighting, one cannot infer it based on a Halacha in a different, unrelated Siman. Others disagree.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 3) and Matnat Yado fn. 4</ref> | |||
=== When Quoting the Rosh === | === When Quoting the Rosh === | ||
# When the Tur writes "My father decided this way" based on proofs, then the idea has import to other topics, as well, while "This is my father's conclusion" does not.<ref>Perishah Choshen Mishpat 182:14, Korban Netanel (Klalim 4)</ref> | # When the Tur writes "My father decided this way" based on proofs, then the idea has import to other topics, as well, while "This is my father's conclusion" does not.<ref>Perishah Choshen Mishpat 182:14, Korban Netanel (Klalim 4)</ref> | ||
