Anonymous

Kippah: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
4 bytes removed ,  22 April 2015
Line 8: Line 8:
* However, the Taz 8:3 writes that it is forbidden not to wear a Kippah because of [[Chukat Akum]]. (Even according to this opinion one can be lenient if one has a reason to take off the Kippah as per Bet Yosef Y”D 178 and Rama against the Gra who forbids Chukot HaGoyim even if there is a reason to take it off.) Pri Megadim A”A 2:6 and Sh”t Elef Lecha Shlomo O”C 3 differentiate between a complete head covering which is a Midat Chasidut and a partial head covering which is an obligation. However, Sh”t Igrot Moshe O”C 1:1 argues on this distinction and adds that perhaps one can make such a distinction within the opinion of the Taz. Rabbi Shalom Mashash in Shemesh U'Magen 2:58 writes that when walking outdoors or in a shul it is obligatory. Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:4, Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15 (4-5), Sh”t Yachave Daat 4:1, and Yalkut Yosef 1:7 write that even if the halacha is that it is only a Midat Chasidut, nowadays, since wearing the Kippah is a symbol of being a religious Jew, wearing a Kippah is somewhat more obligatory than a Midat Chasidut because there is a concern of [[Marit Ayin]] (suspicion) if one is seen without a Kippah. </ref>
* However, the Taz 8:3 writes that it is forbidden not to wear a Kippah because of [[Chukat Akum]]. (Even according to this opinion one can be lenient if one has a reason to take off the Kippah as per Bet Yosef Y”D 178 and Rama against the Gra who forbids Chukot HaGoyim even if there is a reason to take it off.) Pri Megadim A”A 2:6 and Sh”t Elef Lecha Shlomo O”C 3 differentiate between a complete head covering which is a Midat Chasidut and a partial head covering which is an obligation. However, Sh”t Igrot Moshe O”C 1:1 argues on this distinction and adds that perhaps one can make such a distinction within the opinion of the Taz. Rabbi Shalom Mashash in Shemesh U'Magen 2:58 writes that when walking outdoors or in a shul it is obligatory. Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:4, Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15 (4-5), Sh”t Yachave Daat 4:1, and Yalkut Yosef 1:7 write that even if the halacha is that it is only a Midat Chasidut, nowadays, since wearing the Kippah is a symbol of being a religious Jew, wearing a Kippah is somewhat more obligatory than a Midat Chasidut because there is a concern of [[Marit Ayin]] (suspicion) if one is seen without a Kippah. </ref>
# It is a proper and praiseworthy practice to wear a Kippah even when one walks less than 4 [[Amot]] <ref> Sh”t Mahari MeBruna 34 permits it if one walks less than 4 [[Amot]]. However the Bach 2 infers from Rambam (Deot 5:6; More Nevuchim 3:52) that less than 4 [[Amot]] are also forbidden. Taz 8:3, Bchor Shor ([[Shabbat]] 118b), and Birkei Yosef 2:3 concur. Magen Avraham 2:6 writes that it is only a Midat Chasidut to wear it for walking less than 4 [[Amot]]. </ref> or one stands or sits for the time it takes to walk 4 [[Amot]] <ref> Sh”T Mahari MeBruna 34 permits if one is just sitting and Magen Avraham 282:8 permits whether one is sitting or standing. Bechor Shor ([[Shabbat]] 118b), Birkei Yosef 2:3, Halacha Brurah 2:11 are strict as long as one waits the time it takes to walk 4 [[Amot]]. </ref>, whether one is outside or indoors. <ref> Sh”t Maharshal 72 permits one not to wear a Kippah indoors. Knesset Hagedolah 2, Bear Heteiv 2:5, and Olat Tamid 2:5 quote the Maharshal. However, the Bach 2 argues on this distinction. Eliyah Rabba 2:4, Mishna Brurah 2:10, and Halacha Brurah 2:11 concur. </ref>
# It is a proper and praiseworthy practice to wear a Kippah even when one walks less than 4 [[Amot]] <ref> Sh”t Mahari MeBruna 34 permits it if one walks less than 4 [[Amot]]. However the Bach 2 infers from Rambam (Deot 5:6; More Nevuchim 3:52) that less than 4 [[Amot]] are also forbidden. Taz 8:3, Bchor Shor ([[Shabbat]] 118b), and Birkei Yosef 2:3 concur. Magen Avraham 2:6 writes that it is only a Midat Chasidut to wear it for walking less than 4 [[Amot]]. </ref> or one stands or sits for the time it takes to walk 4 [[Amot]] <ref> Sh”T Mahari MeBruna 34 permits if one is just sitting and Magen Avraham 282:8 permits whether one is sitting or standing. Bechor Shor ([[Shabbat]] 118b), Birkei Yosef 2:3, Halacha Brurah 2:11 are strict as long as one waits the time it takes to walk 4 [[Amot]]. </ref>, whether one is outside or indoors. <ref> Sh”t Maharshal 72 permits one not to wear a Kippah indoors. Knesset Hagedolah 2, Bear Heteiv 2:5, and Olat Tamid 2:5 quote the Maharshal. However, the Bach 2 argues on this distinction. Eliyah Rabba 2:4, Mishna Brurah 2:10, and Halacha Brurah 2:11 concur. </ref>
# One is not allowed to make [[brachot]] without a Kippah, but if by accident (for example, the kippah fell off and one did not notice) one made a bracha without a Kippah, the bracha is acceptable after the fact. <ref>Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:5 say that since the Rosh (on [[Brachot]] 60b), Rambam (Tefilah 7:4), and S”A 4 hold that the order of the [[brachot]] is precise and Oter [[Israel]] BeTifarah is made for having a head covering, implying that the other [[brachot]] can be made without a Kippah (Gra 8:6 makes similar implication from Rif). Nonetheless, Masechet Soferim has a dispute whether one can say Hashem’s name without a Kippah and Rabbenu Yerucham (quoted by Bet Yosef 91:3), Or Zaruha 2:43, S”A 91:3 rule stringently. Lechem Yehuda (Tefilah 5:5) argues that it seems that S”A 91:5 holds that one one is required to wear a Kippah when saying [[Shemoneh Esrei]]. Perhaps S”A (retracting from his ruling in Bet Yosef like Rabbenu Yerucham) rules with the term “Yesh Omrim” and then an anonymous opinion and so we should follow the anonymous opinion. Yet, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:15(3) rejects this because S”A 206:3 is very clear that one may not say Hashem’s name without a Kippah and S”A 91:5 meant there is an added reason to wear a Kippah in [[Shemoneh Esrah]]. Sh”t Maharshal 72 says that perhaps it is permitted according to halacha, but since the Minhag is not to say a bracha without a Kippah one should not be lenient (Chida in Sh”t Chaim Shaal 2:35 and Kiseh Rachamim (Masechet Soferim 14) write similarly). Gra (Biur HaGra 8:6 and Meorei Or (Bear Sheva 15b)) writes it is only a Midat Chasidut and if there is a bracha which one will miss if one gets a Kippah (such as if he just heard thunder) one can make the bracha without wearing a Kippah. Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(6) says bedieved one has fulfilled his bracha. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Halichot Shlomo Tefilla 2:16) agrees that one need not repeat it. </ref> Others believe one is require to repeat the bracha. <ref>Sh"t Iggerot Moshe OC 4:40:14</ref>
# One is not allowed to make [[brachot]] without a Kippah, but if by accident (for example, the kippah fell off and one did not notice) one made a bracha without a Kippah, the bracha is acceptable after the fact. <ref>Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:5 say that since the Rosh (on [[Brachot]] 60b), Rambam (Tefilah 7:4), and S”A 4 hold that the order of the [[brachot]] is precise and Oter [[Israel]] BeTifarah is made for having a head covering, implying that the other [[brachot]] can be made without a Kippah (Gra 8:6 makes similar implication from Rif). Nonetheless, Masechet Soferim has a dispute whether one can say Hashem’s name without a Kippah and Rabbenu Yerucham (quoted by Bet Yosef 91:3), Or Zaruha 2:43, S”A 91:3 rule stringently. Lechem Yehuda (Tefilah 5:5) argues that it seems that S”A 91:5 holds that one one is required to wear a Kippah when saying [[Shmoneh Esre]]. Perhaps S”A (retracting from his ruling in Bet Yosef like Rabbenu Yerucham) rules with the term “Yesh Omrim” and then an anonymous opinion and so we should follow the anonymous opinion. Yet, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:15(3) rejects this because S”A 206:3 is very clear that one may not say Hashem’s name without a Kippah and S”A 91:5 meant there is an added reason to wear a Kippah in [[Shmoneh Esre]]. Sh”t Maharshal 72 says that perhaps it is permitted according to halacha, but since the Minhag is not to say a bracha without a Kippah one should not be lenient (Chida in Sh”t Chaim Shaal 2:35 and Kiseh Rachamim (Masechet Soferim 14) write similarly). Gra (Biur HaGra 8:6 and Meorei Or (Bear Sheva 15b)) writes it is only a Midat Chasidut and if there is a bracha which one will miss if one gets a Kippah (such as if he just heard thunder) one can make the bracha without wearing a Kippah. Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(6) says bedieved one has fulfilled his bracha. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Halichot Shlomo Tefilla 2:16) agrees that one need not repeat it. </ref> Others believe one is require to repeat the bracha. <ref>Sh"t Iggerot Moshe OC 4:40:14</ref>
# One is allowed to think about Torah even if one is not wearing a Kippah, such as if one is in bed (although not if one just awoke and has yet to say [[Birchot HaTorah]]) or by a pool. <ref> Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(7), Sherit Yosef 2 pg 370 </ref>
# One is allowed to think about Torah even if one is not wearing a Kippah, such as if one is in bed (although not if one just awoke and has yet to say [[Birchot HaTorah]]) or by a pool. <ref> Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(7), Sherit Yosef 2 pg 370 </ref>
# One is allowed to greet a Jew who is not wearing a Kippah even if he will respond “Shalom” which has the status of Hashem’s name. <Ref> Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(8). See further Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:5e </ref>
# One is allowed to greet a Jew who is not wearing a Kippah even if he will respond “Shalom” which has the status of Hashem’s name. <Ref> Sh”t Yabia Omer 6:15(8). See further Sh”t Otzrot Yosef 1:5e </ref>