16,374
edits
Halachos of Marketing: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→False Advertising
Jeremypurow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
#One is not allowed to use superlatives to present a product if the superlative will likely deceive a reasonable person.<ref>Economic Public Policy and Jewish Law by Rabbi Aaron Levine 1993 p. 76-77</ref> | #One is not allowed to use superlatives to present a product if the superlative will likely deceive a reasonable person.<ref>Economic Public Policy and Jewish Law by Rabbi Aaron Levine 1993 p. 76-77</ref> | ||
#While there is no problem with accurately presenting the positive aspects of merchandise (assuming a reasonable person will not be deceived), sellers are obligated to disclose any defects, deficiencies, shortcomings, or imperfections in their merchandise.<ref>Geneivat Da'at: The Prohibition Against Deception in Today's World, 2002 article by Professor Hershey H. Friedman</ref> This is true even if the merchandise is being sold at a fair price for the condition it is really in. <ref>Maharsha Chulin 94a, The Maharsha poses a case where a seller withholds information about a defect in an object he is selling. Despite the fact that he withholds this information, the seller still sells the object at a lower price (which is fit for the object with the defect). This is still | #While there is no problem with accurately presenting the positive aspects of merchandise (assuming a reasonable person will not be deceived), sellers are obligated to disclose any defects, deficiencies, shortcomings, or imperfections in their merchandise.<ref>Shulchan Aruch C.M. 228:6, [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2295182 Geneivat Da'at: The Prohibition Against Deception in Today's World], 2002 article by Professor Hershey H. Friedman</ref> This is true even if the merchandise is being sold at a fair price for the condition it is really in. <ref>Maharsha Chulin 94a, The Maharsha poses a case where a seller withholds information about a defect in an object he is selling. Despite the fact that he withholds this information, the seller still sells the object at a lower price (which is fit for the object with the defect). This is still genivat daat even though there is no onaa because the buyer believes he is getting a bargain on the object as he does not know about the defect. This is confirmed by Kuntres Onat Devarim UGenivat Daat p. 13 based on the Divrei Chamudot Chullin 94a.</ref> | ||
==Overcharging in Comparison to the Market== | ==Overcharging in Comparison to the Market== | ||
