16,374
edits
General Laws of Muktzeh: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m
Text replace - "Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata " to "Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata "
m (Text replace - "Shabbat" to "Shabbat") |
m (Text replace - "Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata " to "Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata ") |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
# Some consider the following to be exceptions to muktzeh just like the above examples. | # Some consider the following to be exceptions to muktzeh just like the above examples. | ||
* chairs that will be used for sitting <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | * chairs that will be used for sitting <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | ||
* clothing that will be used on [[Shabbat]] <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 4:1 writes that clothing that will be used on [[Shabbat]] is considered non-Muktzeh according to all, while clothing that won’t be used on [[Shabbat]], some consider it non-Muktzeh while others consider it Kli Sh’Melachto LeHeter. Shemirat | * clothing that will be used on [[Shabbat]] <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 4:1 writes that clothing that will be used on [[Shabbat]] is considered non-Muktzeh according to all, while clothing that won’t be used on [[Shabbat]], some consider it non-Muktzeh while others consider it Kli Sh’Melachto LeHeter. Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:83 rules like the Kesot HaShulchan (Badei HaShulchan 108:7) who holds that clothing are considered non-muktzah like food. Nachalat Yisrael 1:7 (pg 3), Mechaze Eliyahu 45, and Shevut Yitzchak (Muktzah pg 85) quoting Rav Elayshiv agree. Yalkut Yosef (vol 2, pg 463) is also lenient regarding clothing. See also Meiri 124b D"H Kli (quoted by Nachalat Yisrael by 140) who considers clothes as a Kli SheMelacha LeHeter.</ref> | ||
* empty bottles for drinks <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | * empty bottles for drinks <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | ||
* keys to the house <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | * keys to the house <ref> Shalmei Yehuda 6:1 </ref> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==Bosis== | ==Bosis== | ||
# A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>S”A 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref> | # A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>S”A 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref> | ||
# A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat | # A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:16 </ref> | ||
==A bosis with both Muktzeh and non-Muktzeh== | ==A bosis with both Muktzeh and non-Muktzeh== | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref> | # What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref> | ||
# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-muktzah object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref> | # Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-muktzah object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref> | ||
Halachos of Muktzah (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of challah and money are on a vessel the challah is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. So rules the Shemirat | Halachos of Muktzah (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of challah and money are on a vessel the challah is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. So rules the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as challah or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magan Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
