16,374
edits
Bracha Rishona: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→If Someone Recited the Wrong Bracha
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
# Haadama exempts Haetz after the fact.<ref>Brachot 40a, Shulchan Aruch 206:1</ref> | # Haadama exempts Haetz after the fact.<ref>Brachot 40a, Shulchan Aruch 206:1</ref> | ||
# After the fact hagefen covers grapes. <ref>Shulchan Aruch 208:15</ref> | # After the fact hagefen covers grapes. <ref>Shulchan Aruch 208:15</ref> | ||
# If someone started the bracha up to the words "Melech Haolam" thinking that the food was supposed to have one bracha and then realized that the bracha was different and said the correct words at the end the bracha is effective.<ref>The Gemara Brachot 12a has a doubt if such a bracha is effective since one's intent was incorrect for the name of Hashem and the Malchut, nonetheless, the Rif Brachot 6a concludes that out of doubt one doesn't have to repeat it. However, Tosfot Brachot 12a s.v. lo holds that one does have to repeat it. Shulchan Aruch 209:1 and Mishna Brurah 209:2 hold like the Rif.</ref> | |||
# If someone started the bracha up to the words "Melech Haolam" thinking that the food was supposed to have the bracha it was really supposed to have and then accidentally concluded thinking that the bracha was supposed to be otherwise, according to Ashkenazim one doesn't fulfill one's obligation and has to recite a new bracha.<ref>Mishna Brurah 209:1</ref> According to Sephardim one shouldn't recite another bracha.<ref>Shulchan Aruch 209:1 based on the Rambam Brachot 8:12</ref> | |||
# if someone recited the incorrect bracha but fixed it within [[Toch Kdei Dibbur]] the bracha is effective.<ref>Tosfot Brachot 12a s.v. lo, Shulchan Aruch 209:2</ref> | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Brachot]] | [[Category:Brachot]] | ||
