Anonymous

Bosis: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
2 bytes added ,  16 July 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
# A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>Shulchan Aruch 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref>
# A basket of fruit with a rock in it shouldn’t be moved without shaking out the rock or at least spilling out everything and returning the fruit without the rock. However, if spilling/shaking out the basket will ruin the fruit one may move the basket as a whole. <Ref>Shulchan Aruch 309:3, Mishna Brurah 309:10 </ref>
# A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a [[Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur]] and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:16 </ref>
# A purse which is made to hold money if there’s no money inside is considered a [[Kli Sh’Melachto LeIssur]] and so if there’s a key inside one may open it to take out the key. <Ref>Shemirat [[Shabbat]] KeHilchata 20:16 </ref>
===Drawers===
# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>


==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==
==Bosis for Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==
# If someone placed candlesticks and challah on his tablecloth the tablecloth is a bosis for both muktzeh and non-muktzeh. If one planned to put down challah before Shabbat and forgot there is a discussion whether the tablecloth is a bosis for both muktzeh and non-muktzeh or just muktzeh.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 200 quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach who is lenient if one forgot to put challot on the tablecloth that the tablecloth isn’t considered a bosis lisur rather a bosis for both. Igrot Moshe 4:73 and 3:51 disagrees since if one forgot to put on the challot it is a bosis since only muktzeh was on the bosis.</ref>
# If someone placed candlesticks and challah on his tablecloth the tablecloth is a bosis for both muktzeh and non-muktzeh. If one planned to put down challah before Shabbat and forgot there is a discussion whether the tablecloth is a bosis for both muktzeh and non-muktzeh or just muktzeh.<ref>Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 200 quotes Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach who is lenient if one forgot to put challot on the tablecloth that the tablecloth isn’t considered a bosis lisur rather a bosis for both. Igrot Moshe 4:73 and 3:51 disagrees since if one forgot to put on the challot it is a bosis since only muktzeh was on the bosis.</ref>


==Drawers==
# If someone leaves items in a drawer with a muktzeh item on top of a permitted item, some say that the permitted item on bottom isn't muktzeh, while some disagree.<ref>Trumat Hadeshen Pesakim 193 writes that some wanted to permit something that was left haphazardly on top of something else unless it was left there to rest there securely. He disagrees with that position. Magen Avraham 309:6 accepts the lenient view. Rabbi Akiva Eiger 309:4 rejects one of the proofs of the Magen Avraham.</ref> Ashkenazim can be lenient in a case of need,<ref>Mishna Brurah 309:18, Shulchan Aruch Harav 309:9, Orchot Shabbat v. 2 p. 134</ref> Sephardim should be strict.<ref>Taz 309:1, Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 133</ref>
==Mid-Shabbat Bosis==
==Mid-Shabbat Bosis==
# Is it possible to create a bosis in the middle of Shabbat? According to the majority of rishonim if muktzeh is intentionally placed upon a non-muktzeh item on Shabbat the non-muktzeh item becomes a bosis such that even tilting off the muktzeh is forbidden.<ref>
# Is it possible to create a bosis in the middle of Shabbat? According to the majority of rishonim if muktzeh is intentionally placed upon a non-muktzeh item on Shabbat the non-muktzeh item becomes a bosis such that even tilting off the muktzeh is forbidden.<ref>
Line 44: Line 44:
# Some say that if one needs to move this mid-Shabbat bosis one can place upon it something non-muktzeh that is more valuable than the muktzeh item and then it'll be permitted to tilt the bosis or if tilting isn't feasible one can bring it to a place where it is.<ref>Taz 310:8, Mishna Brurah 310:37</ref>
# Some say that if one needs to move this mid-Shabbat bosis one can place upon it something non-muktzeh that is more valuable than the muktzeh item and then it'll be permitted to tilt the bosis or if tilting isn't feasible one can bring it to a place where it is.<ref>Taz 310:8, Mishna Brurah 310:37</ref>


==A bosis with both Muktzeh and non-Muktzeh==
==A Bosis with both Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh==
# A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]]. <ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref>
# A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]]. <ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref>
# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>
# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref>