Bosis: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Key Chain
m (Text replacement - "Shemirat Shabbat" to "Shemirat Shabbat") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
===Key Chain=== | ===Key Chain=== | ||
# A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted.</ref> | # A key chain with muktzeh items on it is considered a bosis. If the permitted keys are more important it isn't a bosis.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman (cited by Dirshu 308:6; see Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 20 fnt. 311) explained that unlike a loose leaf where the empty pages in the binder are nullified by the pages with writing, keys on a key chain aren't nullified since each is significant in it of itself. Chazon Ovadia Shabbat v. 3 p. 135 agrees that keys on a key chain are a bosis for the keys and if there's permitted and muktzeh it is permitted. He also supports this with the Yeshuot Yakov 308:5 who holds that there's no bosis for a kli shemelachto lisur.</ref> | ||
# Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> | # Some say to avoid this situation by removing the muktzeh keys from the key chain beforehand.<ref>Meor Hashabbat 4:14 cited by Dirshu 309:8</ref> Others think it isn't necessary.<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shulchan Shlomo 309:13) and Orchot Shabbat (ch. 19 fnt. 386) cited by Dirshu 309:8. Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 135 cites Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 20:86 and Bear Moshe 8:185 as advising separating the muktzeh keys before Shabbat, however he says that Minchat Yitzchak 8:22 implies that it isn't necessary.</ref> | ||
===Sefarim=== | ===Sefarim=== | ||
# If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref> | # If a person left something muktzeh on top of or in a sefer the sefer does become a bosis. Therefore, according to those who hold that blank paper is muktzeh (see [[Books,_Notebooks,_and_Papers_on_Shabbat#Blank_Paper]]) one should be careful not to leave it in a sefer before Shabbat.<ref>Igrot Moshe OC 4:72</ref> | ||
| Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
==A Bosis with both Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh== | ==A Bosis with both Muktzeh and Non-Muktzeh== | ||
# A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]]. <ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref> | # A vessel which has on it both a [[muktzeh]] item and a non-[[muktzeh]] item is non-[[muktzeh]] if the non-[[muktzeh]] item is more impotant than the [[muktzeh]] item, however, if the [[muktzeh]] item is more important, then the vessel is [[muktzeh]].<ref> The Shulchan Aruch 310:8 writes that an object which has on it both a mutkzah item and a non-[[Muktzeh]] item is permissible to move if the non-[[Muktzeh]] item is more important (חשוב). </ref> If they are both equal some poskim hold that it isn't a bosis.<ref>Chazon Ovadia v. 3 p. 131 writes that the Chaye Adam 67:8 holds it is forbidden if both are of equal importance against the Aruch Hashulchan 310:15 who is lenient. He sides with those who are lenient because of the Ran Shabbat 47a and Hagahot Maimoniyot 26:7 who imply it is permitted.</ref> | ||
# What is considered more important depends on the owner. <ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref> | # What is considered more important depends on the owner.<ref> Mishna Brurah 310:33 writes that it only depends on the intent of the owner and not the general convention of most people. </ref> | ||
# Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important. <ref> | # Generally the more valuable item is the one which is considered more important. However, many opinions hold that if an non-[[muktzah]] object is needed for that [[Shabbat]] it is considered more important.<ref> | ||
Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref> | Halachos of [[Muktzah]] (by Rabbi Bodner, pg 309, answers of Rav Moshe Feinstein #31, to see it inside [http://books.google.com/books?id=bAevcHQwPbsC&printsec=frontcover&dq=laws+of+muktzah&hl=en&ei=XMMATvnWDauu0AHRjonMDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false click here]) writes that if a siddur and money are on a vessel the siddur is considered more important, and so too if one has glasses which one needs immediately and a lot of money, the glasses are more important unless one has other glasses in which case the money is more important. Lastly if a loaf of [[challah]] and money are on a vessel the [[challah]] is more important since you’re going to need it on [[Shabbat]]. This is also the opinion of the Shemirat Shabbat KeHilchata 20:61 in name of Rav Shlomo Zalman that anything which is needed for that [[Shabbat]] such as [[challah]] or something else of value. [See also Chaye Adam ([[Shabbat]] 66:4) and Magen Avraham 279:5 who seem to hold of this.] </ref> | ||
