Dvar Ha'aved on Chol Hamoed: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
Line 32: Line 32:


# If someone planned to do melacha to save a dvar haaved on the moed it is forbidden for him to do that melacha on the moed. Furthermore, if he does that melacha the rabbis penalized him and make that work ownerless.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1. Someone who leaves his melacha for the moed is called Mechaven Melachto Bmoed. </ref>
# If someone planned to do melacha to save a dvar haaved on the moed it is forbidden for him to do that melacha on the moed. Furthermore, if he does that melacha the rabbis penalized him and make that work ownerless.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1. Someone who leaves his melacha for the moed is called Mechaven Melachto Bmoed. </ref>
# If someone planned to do work before the moed but then forgot about it, or delayed to do it after the moed and thought it wouldn't be lost beforehand and then it became a dvar haaved on the moed, or if an unforeseen circumstance arose that created a dvar haaved that he couldn't deal with before the moed, then it is permitted to do melacha on the moed.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1</ref>
# If someone planned to do work before the moed but then forgot about it (שכח), or delayed to do it after the moed and thought it wouldn't be lost beforehand and then it became a dvar haaved on the moed (נתעצל והיה סבור), or if an unforeseen circumstance arose that created a dvar haaved that he couldn't deal with before the moed, then it is permitted to do melacha on the moed.<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1</ref>
# If someone was busy and didn't deal with something before the moed and then it was a dvar haaved on the moed, some achronim write that isn't like he intended to intentionally leave it for the moed and it is permitted, while others are strict.<ref>Levush 538:6 writes that if someone forgot, was lazy, or made a bad assessment of whether he needed to do melacha, it isn't considered mechaven melachto bmoed. Mishna Brurah (Shaar Hatzion 540:23) seems to agree. Chazon Ovadia p. 186 is lenient for the person who was lazy to deal with the dvar haaved before the moed and delayed. However, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1 implies that someone lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed unless he also made a bad assessment of when the item would become lost. Magen Avraham 108:11 and Chatom Sofer (CM 42) imply this as well that only someone who forgot, made a bad assessment, or had an unforeseen circumstance is not considered mechaven melachto bmoed. However, someone who was just lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed. Shemirat Hamoed Khilchato (siman 27) shows that Ritva 11b and Rosh 2:1 are strict, while Rambam (Yom Tov 7:4) and Nemukei Yosef 6b are lenient. Rashi (Moed Katan kyad yad 11a s..v. ubilvad, 12b s.v. ubilvad, Gittin 44b s.v. vkulan, Bechorot 34b s.v. vkulan) also seems to be lenient. </ref>
# If someone didn't know that he couldn't leave a dvar haaved to be done on the moed (אומר מותר) and only realized on the moed, some poskim allow him to do it on chol hamoed,<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 66 fnt. 158)</ref> while others consider that to be ''mechaven melachto bmoed'' (trans. planning to do work on the moed) and is forbidden.<ref>Maharsham in his footnotes to Orchot Chaim Sapinka 538:1</ref>
# If someone didn't know that he couldn't leave a dvar haaved to be done on the moed and only realized on the moed, some poskim allow him to do it on chol hamoed,<ref>Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 66 fnt. 158)</ref> while others consider that to be ''mechaven melachto bmoed'' (trans. planning to do work on the moed) and is forbidden.<ref>Maharsham in his footnotes to Orchot Chaim Sapinka 538:1</ref>
# Someone who is lazy (נתעצל) and didn't deal with the dvar haaved before the moed and didn't intend to do it on the moed, for example he wasn't thinking at all about when he would get around to doing it, according to some poskim he may still do it on the moed.<ref>Meiri 12b s.v. vsholeh, Levush 538:6, Mishna Brurah (Shaar Hatziyun 540:23), Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 66:41, Chazon Ovadia (p. 186). This also might be implied by Rambam (Yom Tov 7:4). </ref> However, some poskim hold that it is forbidden and considered ''mechaven melachto bmoed.''<ref>Chatom Sofer CM 42, Magen Avraham 108:11, Shemirat Hamoed Kehilchato (siman 27). This is also implied by Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1. </ref>
# Someone who thought that it wasn't be a dvar haaved because he could wait until after the moed, and pushed off the dvar haaved (נתעצל והיה סבור) and then forgot isn't considered ''mechaven melachto bmoed.''<ref>Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1</ref> However, someone who is lazy and knew that it would be a dvar haaved if he doesn't deal with it before or on the moed and pushed it off until right before the moed and then he forget is considered ''mechaven melachto bmoed'' according to some poskim. Most poskim are lenient about this case.<ref>Even though Chatom Sofer CM 42 is strict about this case, many are lenient like Shulchan Aruch O.C. 108:8 implies. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchato 66:41) rules against the Chatom Sofer that this case isn't mechaven melachto bmoed.</ref>
# Someone who was busy with his work (טרוד בממונו) and didn't have time to deal with the dvar haaved before the moed, according to many poskim isn't considered ''mechaven melachto bmoed.''<ref>Hilchot Chag Bchag 14:15. This is also implied by Magen Avraham 108:11 and Chatom Sofer CM 42 who compared chol hamoed to tashlumin and regarding tashlumin Shulchan Aruch O.C. 108:8 writes that it considered beyond his control if he was busy because of dealing with his money. Gra 108:8 brings a proof for this from Moed Katan 14a that someone who was looking for a lost item is called ones for chol hamoed. </ref> If someone was busy and didn't deal with something before the moed and then it was a dvar haaved on the moed, some achronim write that isn't like he intended to intentionally leave it for the moed and it is permitted, while others are strict.<ref>Levush 538:6 writes that if someone forgot, was lazy, or made a bad assessment of whether he needed to do melacha, it isn't considered mechaven melachto bmoed. Mishna Brurah (Shaar Hatzion 540:23) seems to agree. Chazon Ovadia p. 186 is lenient for the person who was lazy to deal with the dvar haaved before the moed and delayed. However, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1 implies that someone lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed unless he also made a bad assessment of when the item would become lost. Magen Avraham 108:11 and Chatom Sofer (CM 42) imply this as well that only someone who forgot, made a bad assessment, or had an unforeseen circumstance is not considered mechaven melachto bmoed. However, someone who was just lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed. Shemirat Hamoed Khilchato (siman 27) shows that Ritva 11b and Rosh 2:1 are strict, while Rambam (Yom Tov 7:4) and Nemukei Yosef 6b are lenient. Rashi (Moed Katan kyad yad 11a s..v. ubilvad, 12b s.v. ubilvad, Gittin 44b s.v. vkulan, Bechorot 34b s.v. vkulan) also seems to be lenient. </ref>


== Safek Dvar Ha'aved ==
== Safek Dvar Ha'aved ==

Revision as of 14:53, 10 June 2024

Running a Business

  1. It is permitted to work on chol hamoed if there is a dvar ha'aved. Dvar Hamoed means losing capital and not missing an opportunity to make money.[1]
  2. If someone is in danger of losing his job if he doesn't go to work on chol hamoed it is permitted for him to work.
  3. If someone has vacation days that he can take on chol hamoed but would prefer to use them at other times, it is forbidden for him to work on chol hamoed and he should take the vacation days then.
  4. If someone runs a business that has overhead costs, such as rent for office space or salaried workers, who he has to pay whether or not the business is open on chol hamoed, some poskim consider that dvar ha'aved.[2] Other poskim hold that it is not dvar ha'aved.[3]
  5. Losing a customer is considered a dvar ha'aved. Accordingly, if a business thinks that if by closing for chol hamoed it will permanently lose steady customers it is permitted to remain open on chol hamoed. However, unnecessary melacha must be avoided. If an order can wait to be fulfilled until after the moed, melacha to fulfill that order may not be done on the moed.[4] A rabbi should be consulted.

Watering Plants

  1. It is permitted to water plants that need be watered on chol hamoed in order to continue growing. If without water they'll die it is permitted to water them. However, if without water they'll grow but the fruits will just come more slowly or there will be fewer that is not a dvar ha'aved and it is forbidden to water them on the moed.[5]
  2. It is only permitted to water plants with water from the tap or hose directly. That is the modern-day equivalent to water from a spring, which Chazal permitted.[6] However, one may not draw with buckets to water plants even if they would die without the water.[7]
  3. If a plant is also ready to be picked, it is permitted even to draw water to water plants in order to pick them and eat them on the moed.[8] However, it is forbidden to water plants to improve them for after the moed.[9]

Can dvar haaved be done normally on Chol Hamoed?

  1. If there is a concern of a significant loss it is permitted to do melacha for dvar haaved normally without doing a shinuy (something abnormal). However, if there is a very minor concern of a loss it is only permitted to do melacha for dvar haaved with a shinuy.[10]

Can excessive effort be done for dvar haaved?

  1. It is forbidden to do excessive effort (tircha yetera) when doing a dvar haaved.[11]

Can a professional be asked to do melacha for dvar haaved?

  1. It is permitted to do a maaseh uman (professional work) for a dvar ha'aved.[12]

Can it be done in public?

  1. When doing melacha for dvar haaved it is necessary to do the melacha in private if possible. For example, if it can be done at night in a way that less people would see it if done at night it must be done at night.[13]

Intentionally leaving a dvar haaved for the moed

  1. If someone planned to do melacha to save a dvar haaved on the moed it is forbidden for him to do that melacha on the moed. Furthermore, if he does that melacha the rabbis penalized him and make that work ownerless.[14]
  2. If someone planned to do work before the moed but then forgot about it (שכח), or delayed to do it after the moed and thought it wouldn't be lost beforehand and then it became a dvar haaved on the moed (נתעצל והיה סבור), or if an unforeseen circumstance arose that created a dvar haaved that he couldn't deal with before the moed, then it is permitted to do melacha on the moed.[15]
  3. If someone didn't know that he couldn't leave a dvar haaved to be done on the moed (אומר מותר) and only realized on the moed, some poskim allow him to do it on chol hamoed,[16] while others consider that to be mechaven melachto bmoed (trans. planning to do work on the moed) and is forbidden.[17]
  4. Someone who is lazy (נתעצל) and didn't deal with the dvar haaved before the moed and didn't intend to do it on the moed, for example he wasn't thinking at all about when he would get around to doing it, according to some poskim he may still do it on the moed.[18] However, some poskim hold that it is forbidden and considered mechaven melachto bmoed.[19]
  5. Someone who thought that it wasn't be a dvar haaved because he could wait until after the moed, and pushed off the dvar haaved (נתעצל והיה סבור) and then forgot isn't considered mechaven melachto bmoed.[20] However, someone who is lazy and knew that it would be a dvar haaved if he doesn't deal with it before or on the moed and pushed it off until right before the moed and then he forget is considered mechaven melachto bmoed according to some poskim. Most poskim are lenient about this case.[21]
  6. Someone who was busy with his work (טרוד בממונו) and didn't have time to deal with the dvar haaved before the moed, according to many poskim isn't considered mechaven melachto bmoed.[22] If someone was busy and didn't deal with something before the moed and then it was a dvar haaved on the moed, some achronim write that isn't like he intended to intentionally leave it for the moed and it is permitted, while others are strict.[23]

Safek Dvar Ha'aved

  1. Safek dvar ha'aved is permitted.[24] The poskim write that if the concern that he'll come to a loss is likely to happen, because of a common occurence, then it is permitted. However, if the concern that he'll come to a loss is unlikely to happen, then it is forbidden.[25]

Sources

  1. ↑ Moed Katan 2a, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:1. Tiferet Yisrael (Kupat Rochlim 5:5) holds that missing an extremely big opportunity is considered like a dvar ha'aved but that opinion is not accepted by the poskim.
  2. ↑ Aruch Hashulchan (YD 380:6, OC 533:3), Divrei Malkiel 2:100, Rav Moshe (Hilchot Chol Hamoed Zichron Shlomo teshuva n. 17), Rav Ovadia (Chazon Ovadia p. 182)
  3. ↑ Birkei Yosef 537:2 quoting Maharam Provansal, Rav Shlomo Zalman (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 67 fnt. 40), Rav Yakov Kamenetsky (Hilchot Chol Hamoed Zichron Shlomo p. 56 fnt. 33), Minchat Yitzchak 6:52
  4. ↑ Hilchot Chol Hamoed Zichron Shlomo p. 56
  5. ↑ Moed Katan 2a, 6b, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:2
  6. ↑ Kaf Hachaim 537:13, Chazon Ish 134:14, Piskei Teshuvot 537:3. Kaf Hachaim writes that a machine which draws water from a spring that doesn't involve a lot of exertion is the equivalent of drawing water from a spring with one's foot which is permitted. Chazon Ish agrees regarding a pump that gets its water from a spring. Piskei Teshuvot applies this to modern day tap water. [Fundamentally, it doesn't matter if the tap water is from a spring or rainwater reservoir because they don't become used up when they're used normally. (Moed Katan 4a, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:3)]
  7. ↑ Moed Katan 2a, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:2
  8. ↑ Moed Katan 4a permits water plants to eat them on the moed. This is codified in Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:4. In this case it is even permitted to draw water which is a tircha since it is for ochel nefesh. Mishna Brurah 537:14 quotes Ritva who adds that it is permitted to draw water for plants to sell for other people to eat them on the moed. That too is considered a need of ochel nefesh. (Note that Ochel Nefesh does not include non-Jews on Chol Hamoed, Chayey Adam 106:11.)
  9. ↑ Moed Katan 4a, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:4
  10. ↑ Rabbenu Gershom 6b s.v. uvsadeh, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:13, Mishna Brurah 537:37
  11. ↑ Moed Katan 2a, 4a, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 537:2. [Bet Yosef 538:1 suggests that tircha yetera is only asur for dvar haaved if it is attached to the ground. However, this seems to be contradicted by Pesachim 55b and Moed Katan 13b.]
  12. ↑ Tosfot (Moed Katan 10a s.v. tofer), Mordechai (m"k n. 844), Maharshach 1:113, Tiferet Yisrael (Kupat Rochlin 5:5)
  13. ↑ Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:2 and Rama. Mishna Brurah 538:12 explains that it should be done in private so that people don't mistakenly learn incorrect leniencies from this precedent. According to Ramban (Piskei Chol Hamoed), tzina (privacy) is only necessary when avoiding a loss of theft but not if the item itself is going to spoil. Ritva understands that this is because when the item itself is spoiling then it is evident why he's working and tzina isn't necessary. However, Maggid Mishna understands the distinction is between whether the item is certainly going to spoil or it is uncertain. If it is certain then it can be done in public, otherwise it needs tzina.
  14. ↑ Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1. Someone who leaves his melacha for the moed is called Mechaven Melachto Bmoed.
  15. ↑ Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1
  16. ↑ Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata ch. 66 fnt. 158)
  17. ↑ Maharsham in his footnotes to Orchot Chaim Sapinka 538:1
  18. ↑ Meiri 12b s.v. vsholeh, Levush 538:6, Mishna Brurah (Shaar Hatziyun 540:23), Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchata 66:41, Chazon Ovadia (p. 186). This also might be implied by Rambam (Yom Tov 7:4).
  19. ↑ Chatom Sofer CM 42, Magen Avraham 108:11, Shemirat Hamoed Kehilchato (siman 27). This is also implied by Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1.
  20. ↑ Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1
  21. ↑ Even though Chatom Sofer CM 42 is strict about this case, many are lenient like Shulchan Aruch O.C. 108:8 implies. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (Shemirat Shabbat Kehilchato 66:41) rules against the Chatom Sofer that this case isn't mechaven melachto bmoed.
  22. ↑ Hilchot Chag Bchag 14:15. This is also implied by Magen Avraham 108:11 and Chatom Sofer CM 42 who compared chol hamoed to tashlumin and regarding tashlumin Shulchan Aruch O.C. 108:8 writes that it considered beyond his control if he was busy because of dealing with his money. Gra 108:8 brings a proof for this from Moed Katan 14a that someone who was looking for a lost item is called ones for chol hamoed.
  23. ↑ Levush 538:6 writes that if someone forgot, was lazy, or made a bad assessment of whether he needed to do melacha, it isn't considered mechaven melachto bmoed. Mishna Brurah (Shaar Hatzion 540:23) seems to agree. Chazon Ovadia p. 186 is lenient for the person who was lazy to deal with the dvar haaved before the moed and delayed. However, Shulchan Aruch O.C. 538:1 implies that someone lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed unless he also made a bad assessment of when the item would become lost. Magen Avraham 108:11 and Chatom Sofer (CM 42) imply this as well that only someone who forgot, made a bad assessment, or had an unforeseen circumstance is not considered mechaven melachto bmoed. However, someone who was just lazy is called mechaven melachto bmoed. Shemirat Hamoed Khilchato (siman 27) shows that Ritva 11b and Rosh 2:1 are strict, while Rambam (Yom Tov 7:4) and Nemukei Yosef 6b are lenient. Rashi (Moed Katan kyad yad 11a s..v. ubilvad, 12b s.v. ubilvad, Gittin 44b s.v. vkulan, Bechorot 34b s.v. vkulan) also seems to be lenient.
  24. ↑ Maharshach 1:113. His two proofs are the Rashba writes that it is permitted to write down one's finances so that a person doesn't forget them and come to a loss. Also, Raavad writes that it is permitted to write a letter and send it on the moed because perhaps after the moed there won't be anyone to deliver the mail available. Mabit 1:27 agrees. Magen Avraham 537 codifies this. Chazon Ish 134:14 agrees. However, Machasit Hashekel, Pri Megadim, and Levushei Srad on 537 write that according to the opinion that melacha on chol hamoed is from the Torah safek dvar ha'aved is forbidden. Chayey Adam 106:5 writes that safek dvar ha'aved should be done by a non-Jew.
  25. ↑ Biur Halacha 537:1 s.v. dvar, Hilchot Chol Hamoed Zichron Shlomo p. 51
Retrieved from "http://localhost:80/index.php?title=Dvar_Ha%27aved_on_Chol_Hamoed&oldid=33063"