Shomrim: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
Maharikorkus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When someone temporarily has someone else's property, they become a shomer- or bailee in contemporary English. As shomer, they have a responsibility towards the item, and a corresponding liability if something goes wrong. | |||
The Torah distinguishes between four categories of shomrim who each have a different level of liability and responsibility | |||
'''Shomer Chinam'''- Someone who watches someone else's item for no salary | |||
'''Shomer Sachar'''- Someone who is paid to watch something | |||
'''Socher'''- Some who rents something | |||
'''Shoel'''- Someone who borrows something. | |||
==Shomer Shmasar Lshomer== | ==Shomer Shmasar Lshomer== | ||
# One guard should not give the item to another guard to watch. However, he could give it to his wife or children to watch.<reF>Bava Metsia 36b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:21</ref> | # One guard should not give the item to another guard to watch. However, he could give it to his wife or children to watch.<reF>Bava Metsia 36b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:21</ref> | ||
==Shomer Chinam== | ==Shomer Chinam== | ||
# A shomer chinam, someone watching someone's property for free, is exempt from lose and theft.<ref>Bava Metsia 94b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:1</ref> | # A shomer chinam, someone watching someone's property for free, is exempt from lose and theft.<ref>Bava Metsia 94b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:1</ref> | ||
# When a shomer chinam loses something he's exempt. Some | # When a shomer chinam loses something he's exempt. Some say that he is exempt once he put in a safe place and doesn't remember where he left it. Others argue that he is obligated in such a case because of negligence. Rather he is only exempt if he left it in a safe place and now he looks in that place and doesn't see it. He is exempt even though there's no suspicion of a robbery but nonetheless if it was moved by someone else or the like it is called losing an object and is exempt.<ref> Gemara Bava Metsia 35a explains that if a person lost an object because he doesn't know that is negligence and not exempt. Meiri b"m 35a quotes two opinions about the definition of losing an object that is exempt. Some say that one is exempt anytime one put it in a safe place but if one doesn't remember where he left it that is negligence since he didn't put it in a safe place. However, others say that it is negligence if one doesn't remember where one left it even if one certainly put it in a safe place. Shomrim Hafked p. 138 explains that according to the second opinion the only time one is exempt for losing an object is if one looks in the place where one left it and it isn't there but there was no evidence of thievery. This is implied by Igrot Moshe CM 1:32. Ritva b"m 35a follows the first opinion of the Meiri, but the Rambam and Shulchan Aruch CM 291:7 follow the second opinion. Shomrim Hafked does as well.</ref> | ||
== Shomer Sachar == | |||
== Socher == | |||
== Shoel == | |||
== ''Balav imo'' == | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category: Choshen Mishpat]] | [[Category: Choshen Mishpat]] | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 16 July 2024
When someone temporarily has someone else's property, they become a shomer- or bailee in contemporary English. As shomer, they have a responsibility towards the item, and a corresponding liability if something goes wrong.
The Torah distinguishes between four categories of shomrim who each have a different level of liability and responsibility
Shomer Chinam- Someone who watches someone else's item for no salary
Shomer Sachar- Someone who is paid to watch something
Socher- Some who rents something
Shoel- Someone who borrows something.
Shomer Shmasar Lshomer
- One guard should not give the item to another guard to watch. However, he could give it to his wife or children to watch.[1]
Shomer Chinam
- A shomer chinam, someone watching someone's property for free, is exempt from lose and theft.[2]
- When a shomer chinam loses something he's exempt. Some say that he is exempt once he put in a safe place and doesn't remember where he left it. Others argue that he is obligated in such a case because of negligence. Rather he is only exempt if he left it in a safe place and now he looks in that place and doesn't see it. He is exempt even though there's no suspicion of a robbery but nonetheless if it was moved by someone else or the like it is called losing an object and is exempt.[3]
Shomer Sachar
Socher
Shoel
Balav imo
Sources
- ↑ Bava Metsia 36b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:21
- ↑ Bava Metsia 94b, Shulchan Aruch C.M. 291:1
- ↑ Gemara Bava Metsia 35a explains that if a person lost an object because he doesn't know that is negligence and not exempt. Meiri b"m 35a quotes two opinions about the definition of losing an object that is exempt. Some say that one is exempt anytime one put it in a safe place but if one doesn't remember where he left it that is negligence since he didn't put it in a safe place. However, others say that it is negligence if one doesn't remember where one left it even if one certainly put it in a safe place. Shomrim Hafked p. 138 explains that according to the second opinion the only time one is exempt for losing an object is if one looks in the place where one left it and it isn't there but there was no evidence of thievery. This is implied by Igrot Moshe CM 1:32. Ritva b"m 35a follows the first opinion of the Meiri, but the Rambam and Shulchan Aruch CM 291:7 follow the second opinion. Shomrim Hafked does as well.
