Rash MiShantz: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) (→Klalim: perush hamishna) |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Klalim= | =Klalim= | ||
# R' Shimon of Shantz, also known as the Rashba or Rash MiShantz, was a Talmid of the Ri Hazaken and brother of the Ritza.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Shin 178)</ref> | |||
# When elucidating a Mishnah, R' Shimshon a number of times first presents the explanation that seems correct but then negates it by quoting the Gemara's explanation.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei She'ar Mechabrim 9)</ref> | # When elucidating a Mishnah, R' Shimshon a number of times first presents the explanation that seems correct but then negates it by quoting the Gemara's explanation.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei She'ar Mechabrim 9)</ref> | ||
# There's a debate if the Rash ever saw the [[Rambam]]'s Perush HaMishnah, because he never quotes it in his own commentary, yet, he apparently discuss it in letters with other Rishonim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei She'ar Mechabrim 11), Matnat Yado fn. 21</ref> | # There's a debate if the Rash ever saw the [[Rambam]]'s Perush HaMishnah, because he never quotes it in his own commentary, yet, he apparently discuss it in letters with other Rishonim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei She'ar Mechabrim 11), Matnat Yado fn. 21</ref> | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
=Sources= | =Sources= | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Klalei Haposkim]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 11 August 2020
Klalim
- R' Shimon of Shantz, also known as the Rashba or Rash MiShantz, was a Talmid of the Ri Hazaken and brother of the Ritza.[1]
- When elucidating a Mishnah, R' Shimshon a number of times first presents the explanation that seems correct but then negates it by quoting the Gemara's explanation.[2]
- There's a debate if the Rash ever saw the Rambam's Perush HaMishnah, because he never quotes it in his own commentary, yet, he apparently discuss it in letters with other Rishonim.[3]
