Serara: Difference between revisions
(→Rambam) |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Serara''' (also termed '''mesima''') refers to the Halachik debate concerning the appointment of women to positions of leadership.<ref>http://www.ise.bgu.ac.il/faculty/kalech/judaism/frimer07WomenCommunalLeadershipPositions.pdf</ref> | '''Serara''' (also termed '''mesima''') refers to the Halachik debate concerning the appointment of women to positions of leadership and authority.<ref>http://www.ise.bgu.ac.il/faculty/kalech/judaism/frimer07WomenCommunalLeadershipPositions.pdf</ref> | ||
== Hilchos Melachim == | == Hilchos Melachim == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
"We may not appoint a woman as king. When describing the monarchy, the Torah employs the male form of the word king and not the female. This principle also applies to all other positions of authority within Israel. Only men should be appointed to fill them."<ref>Rambam, Yad Hachazakah, Hilchos Melachim 1:5.</ref> | "We may not appoint a woman as king. When describing the monarchy, the Torah employs the male form of the word king and not the female. This principle also applies to all other positions of authority within Israel. Only men should be appointed to fill them."<ref>Rambam, Yad Hachazakah, Hilchos Melachim 1:5.</ref> | ||
=== | === Devorah's leadership and Serara === | ||
The Radvaz clarifies the Rambam's ruling that the role of Devora the prophetess as leader did not violate Serara | The Radvaz clarifies the Rambam's ruling that the role of Devora the prophetess as leader did not violate Serara | ||
as Devorah was a teacher of Torah not a political leader or that Devorah's leadership was sanctioned by Hashem through Nevuah.<ref>Radvaz, Hilchos Melachim 1:5.</ref> | as Devorah was a teacher of Torah not a political leader or that Devorah's leadership was sanctioned by Hashem through Nevuah.<ref>Radvaz, Hilchos Melachim 1:5.</ref> | ||
The Ritva presents a different approach concerning Devorah, and states that Devorah was only informally treated as a leader, or that the Nation of Israel chose Devorah as a leader despite there being no Halachik basis for Devorah's leadership.<ref>Chidushei Ritva, Shavuos 30a.</ref> | |||
=== Igros Moshe === | |||
According to Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, there are instances (specifically in the context of Kashrus supervision) where leniency can be applied as not all Rishonim agree with the Rambam's pesak.<ref>Igros Moshe, Yoreh Deah, Vol. 2, Siman 45.</ref> | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Latest revision as of 21:09, 12 July 2020
Serara (also termed mesima) refers to the Halachik debate concerning the appointment of women to positions of leadership and authority.[1]
Hilchos Melachim
Rambam
"We may not appoint a woman as king. When describing the monarchy, the Torah employs the male form of the word king and not the female. This principle also applies to all other positions of authority within Israel. Only men should be appointed to fill them."[2]
Devorah's leadership and Serara
The Radvaz clarifies the Rambam's ruling that the role of Devora the prophetess as leader did not violate Serara as Devorah was a teacher of Torah not a political leader or that Devorah's leadership was sanctioned by Hashem through Nevuah.[3]
The Ritva presents a different approach concerning Devorah, and states that Devorah was only informally treated as a leader, or that the Nation of Israel chose Devorah as a leader despite there being no Halachik basis for Devorah's leadership.[4]
Igros Moshe
According to Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, there are instances (specifically in the context of Kashrus supervision) where leniency can be applied as not all Rishonim agree with the Rambam's pesak.[5]
