Interruptions to a Bracha: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
m (Text replacement - "Yachava" to "Yechave") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
# According to Sephardim, one who went to the bathroom while eating fruit when one returns one should make a new Bracha on the fruit. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330), Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) </ref> | # According to Sephardim, one who went to the bathroom while eating fruit when one returns one should make a new Bracha on the fruit. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330), Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44) </ref> | ||
==Interruption of a | ==Interruption of a Bread Meal== | ||
# If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) </ref> | # If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption. <Ref>Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) codifies this.</ref> | ||
# Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref> | # Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash [[Netilat Yadayim]]. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229) </ref> | ||
# During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref> | # During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash [[Netilat Yadayim]] without a Bracha. <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331) </ref> | ||
# Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref> | # Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make [[Netilat Yadayim]] and [[Asher Yatzer]] afterwards. <Ref>Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330) </ref> | ||
# If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal. <Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref> | # If one said [[Shir HaMaalot]] it is not considered an interruption of the meal. <Ref>Piskei Teshuvot 179:4 </ref> | ||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Brachot]] | [[Category:Brachot]] | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 16 August 2016
When is a new Bracha Rishona required?
- As long as one didn’t have a interruption in one's train of thought (Hesech Hadaat), which will be clarified below, one doesn’t need to make a new Bracha Rishona. However, if one made a Bracha Achrona, and one wants to eat again a new Bracha Rishona is needed. [1]
- If one if planning on having coffee or tea for a length of time as one sits and learns, one Shehakol covers all the cups one drinks even there’s a long break between cups. [2]
- If one made a Bracha Rishona and waited 72 minutes one doesn’t need to make another Bracha Rishona. [3]
- If one made a Bracha Achrona only because one was afraid that Shuir Ikul would pass and one has intent to continue eating afterwards, one doesn’t need a new Bracha Rishona when one continues to eat. [4]
- According to Sephardim, one who went to the bathroom while eating fruit when one returns one should make a new Bracha on the fruit. [5]
Interruption of a Bread Meal
- If one Davened in middle of a meal it’s not considered an interruption. [6]
- Sleeping in middle of a meal isn’t considered an interruption except that one needs to wash Netilat Yadayim. [7]
- During a meal, if one touches areas of one's body which are supposed to be covered, one should wash Netilat Yadayim without a Bracha. [8]
- Someone who went to the bathroom during a meal isn’t considered an interruption rather one should just make Netilat Yadayim and Asher Yatzer afterwards. [9]
- If one said Shir HaMaalot it is not considered an interruption of the meal. [10]
Sources
- ↑ Beiur Halacha 190 s.v. Acher, Vezot HaBracha (pg 53, chapter 5)
- ↑ Sh”t Yechave Daat 6:11, Sh”t Yabia Omer O”C 6:27, Sh”t Chazon Ovadyah 1:18, Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 224)
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (vol 3, pg 227)
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (Kitzur S”A 178:18)
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330), Halichot Olam (vol 1 pg 44)
- ↑ Tosfot Pesachim 102a s.v. vaakru proves from the gemara that if a party left the house to daven it isn't considered an interruption of a meal that davening in the middle of a meal isn't considered an interruption at all. Even though one can't eat while one is davening, nonetheless, it isn't an interruption. Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 228) codifies this.
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 229)
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 331)
- ↑ Yalkut Yosef (vol 3 pg 330)
- ↑ Piskei Teshuvot 179:4
