Anonymous

Veset: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
293 bytes added ,  16 February 2018
Line 69: Line 69:


===Veset Haflagah===
===Veset Haflagah===
# For a veset haflagah, there is a dispute whether the shorter interval uproots a longer interval. Many poskim hold it doesn't uproot it.<ref>Bet Yosef 189:13 and Darkei Moshe 189:1 very clearly imply that a shorter period doesn't uproot a longer interval. This is also the opinion of the Taz 189:18, Torat Hashlamim 189:22, and [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=36277&st=&pgnum=124 Beit Meir 189:13]. On the other extreme, the Shach 189:31 holds that a shorter interval uproots an earlier one. Perisha 189:28 fundamentally agrees with the Shach. [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/869021/rabbi-mordechai-i-willig/niddah-shiur-54-short-veset-uprooting-longer-missed-veset-kavuah-3x/ Rabbi Mordechai Willig (Niddah Shiur 54)] holds like the Shach.
# For a veset haflagah, there is a dispute whether the shorter interval uproots a longer interval. Many poskim hold it doesn't uproot it.<ref>Bet Yosef 189:13 and Darkei Moshe 189:1 very clearly imply that a shorter period doesn't uproot a longer interval. This is also the opinion of the Taz 189:18, Torat Hashlamim 189:22, and [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=36277&st=&pgnum=124 Beit Meir 189:13]. On the other extreme, the Shach 189:31 holds that a shorter interval uproots an earlier one. Perisha 189:28 fundamentally agrees with the Shach. [http://www.yutorah.org/sidebar/lecture.cfm/869021/rabbi-mordechai-i-willig/niddah-shiur-54-short-veset-uprooting-longer-missed-veset-kavuah-3x/ Rabbi Mordechai Willig (Niddah Shiur 54)] holds like the Shach. Badei Hashulchan 189:141 agrees with the Shulchan Aruch Harav who explains that even according to the Shach the shorter interval doesn't completely uproot the longer interval forever. It only makes it so don't have to be concerned with it but if it returns once then it is considered a veset.
* A compromise opinion is that of the Bach 189:16 s.v. vharav who holds that it isn't uprooted but the haflagah is only counted from the last time she saw.  
* A compromise opinion is that of the Bach 189:16 s.v. vharav who holds that it isn't uprooted but the haflagah is only counted from the last time she saw.  
* Badei Hashulchan (Tziyunim 132) writes that we don’t hold like the Shach that a shorter interval uproots a longer one. Shevet Halevi 2:81 and 5:107 doesn't hold like the Shach in most cases.</ref>
* Badei Hashulchan (Tziyunim 132) writes that we don’t hold like the Shach that a shorter interval uproots a longer one. Shevet Halevi 2:81 and 5:107 doesn't hold like the Shach in most cases.</ref>