Anonymous

Shulchan Aruch: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
missing works
(maggid mesharim)
(missing works)
Line 36: Line 36:
# The Rama didn't see the Bedek HaBayit,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref> because it was printed after he died.<ref>Elyah Rabbah 101:3, Birkei Yosef Yoreh Deah 286:2 and Orach Chaim 27:4 and 101, Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 "Bedek HaBayit," Sdei Cheemd Klalei HaPoskim 14:9), Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
# The Rama didn't see the Bedek HaBayit,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 39)</ref> because it was printed after he died.<ref>Elyah Rabbah 101:3, Birkei Yosef Yoreh Deah 286:2 and Orach Chaim 27:4 and 101, Shem HaGedolim vol. 2 "Bedek HaBayit," Sdei Cheemd Klalei HaPoskim 14:9), Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
# When faced with a Bedek HaBayit that permits something prohibited in the Beit Yosef, the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] argues it doesn't indicate retraction: the Beit Yosef is a comprehensive compilation of all the opinions, so he was just filling it in but doesn't necessarily hold of it.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 37)</ref>
# When faced with a Bedek HaBayit that permits something prohibited in the Beit Yosef, the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] argues it doesn't indicate retraction: the Beit Yosef is a comprehensive compilation of all the opinions, so he was just filling it in but doesn't necessarily hold of it.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Beit Yosef 37)</ref>
# Some of the pamphlets of Bedek HaBayit were lost, which may account for contradictions between Beit Yosef and Shulchan Aruch, as the retracting statements never made it to the page.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Yud 165)</ref>
# Some of the pamphlets of Bedek HaBayit were lost, which may account for contradictions between Beit Yosef and Shulchan Aruch, as the retracting statements never made it to the page. The [[Chida]] postulates that only 1/50 of the actual Bedek HaBayit is extant.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Yud 165)</ref>


== Klalei Shulchan Aruch ==
== Klalei Shulchan Aruch ==
Line 154: Line 154:
# The [[Ra'ah]]'s Bedek HaBayit was not available to Maran.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 15)</ref>
# The [[Ra'ah]]'s Bedek HaBayit was not available to Maran.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 15)</ref>
# Maran never saw Piskei or Chiddushei Ha[[Riaz]] or [[Shiltei HaGibborim]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear HaMechabrim 44), Birkei Yosef Orach Chaim 188:2, Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Shiltei HaGibborim)</ref>
# Maran never saw Piskei or Chiddushei Ha[[Riaz]] or [[Shiltei HaGibborim]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear HaMechabrim 44), Birkei Yosef Orach Chaim 188:2, Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Shiltei HaGibborim)</ref>
 
== Works No Longer Extant ==
In addition to the aforementioned missing sections of Bedek HaBayit, Rav Yosef Karo wrote a commentary on those of Rashi and Ramban, a commentary on Mishnayot, and responsa on all four sections of Shulchan Aruch,<ref>Hakdama to Shu"t Beit Yosef (Even HaEzer)</ref> though we only have the Shu"t Beit Yosef on Even HaEzer today. The [[Chida]] the other sections of responsa in manuscript<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Yud 165)</ref>
== Klalei HaRama ==
== Klalei HaRama ==
=== Purpose ===
=== Purpose ===