Rama: Difference between revisions
From Halachipedia
→Writing Style
MordechaiD (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref> | # A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref> | ||
# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> | # On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> | ||
= Contradictions = | #Generally when the Rama writes נוהגין that indicates that he accepts and advocates for the minhag and when he writes והעם נהגו that means he's citing a substantial minhag but does not necessarily mean he personally endorses it.<ref>Rama responsa 35</ref> | ||
= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology = | |||
# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref> | # Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref> | ||
# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</reF> | |||
# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref> | |||
== Sources== | == Sources== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | {{Reflist|30em}} | ||
[[Category: Klalim]] | [[Category: Klalim]] | ||
