Paying Workers on Time: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
# Paying workers in a timely fashion is a biblical mitzvah.<ref> Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:1. The Sema there explains that the Talmud (Bava Metzia 111a) derives this from the verse, “At his day you shall give him his hire, nor shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor and sets his heart upon it; lest he cry against you to the Lord, and it should be sin to you” (Devarim 24: 15). While there are potentially five biblical prohibitions in delaying pay, the Sema notes that the Rambam, Tur, and Shulchan Arukh only list one, as five only apply when one does not plan to pay at all (see 339:2). There is also the verse “the wages of he who is hired shall not remain with you all night until the morning” (Vayikra 19:13). Thus this mitzvah is often known as bal talin.It is important to emphasize that the reason for the mitzvah is integral to the mitzvah itself. A guiding factor in this topic should be that people work to make a living, and withholding that living is unfair and immoral, unless, as we will see, the employer and employee operate on consensual terms.</ref>  
==Mitzva==
# Paying workers in a timely fashion is a biblical mitzvah.<ref> Sefer Hachinuch Mitzva 588Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:1. The Sema there explains that the Talmud (Bava Metzia 111a) derives this from the verse, “At his day you shall give him his hire, nor shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor and sets his heart upon it; lest he cry against you to the Lord, and it should be sin to you” (Devarim 24: 15). While there are potentially five biblical prohibitions in delaying pay, the Sema notes that the Rambam, Tur, and Shulchan Arukh only list one, as five only apply when one does not plan to pay at all (see 339:2). There is also the verse “the wages of he who is hired shall not remain with you all night until the morning” (Vayikra 19:13). Thus this mitzvah is often known as bal talin.It is important to emphasize that the reason for the mitzvah is integral to the mitzvah itself. A guiding factor in this topic should be that people work to make a living, and withholding that living is unfair and immoral, unless, as we will see, the employer and employee operate on consensual terms. see Ahavat Chessed introduction to Perek 9 who bemoans the fact that many people, who are otherwise very ethical, are lax in their observance in this mitzva, and take liberties they would not take in any other area of halacha</ref>  
# If an employer completely refuses to pay a worker his wages, in addition to violating Lo Talin, he also violates Oshek.<Ref>Sefer Hachinuch Mitzva 258, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:8, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40</ref> For example, if a business closes, and the employer decides not to pay the last payroll because of the losses, he is in violation of Oshek. <ref>Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40</ref> Regarding bankruptcy of a corporation, a competent halachic authority should be consulted. see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/article/bankruptcy-halacha Bankruptcy in Halacha] from the Business Halacha Institute, [https://www.jlaw.com/Articles/bank.html Bankruptcy: A Halakhic Perspective] by Rabbi Yitzchok Breitowitz, and [http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/bankruptcy.html Bankruptcy - A Viable Halachic Option?] by Steven H. Resnicoff </ref>
# If an employer completely refuses to pay a worker his wages, in addition to violating Lo Talin, he also violates Oshek.<Ref>Sefer Hachinuch Mitzva 258, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:8, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40</ref> For example, if a business closes, and the employer decides not to pay the last payroll because of the losses, he is in violation of Oshek. <ref>Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40</ref> Regarding bankruptcy of a corporation, a competent halachic authority should be consulted. see [https://www.businesshalacha.com/en/article/bankruptcy-halacha Bankruptcy in Halacha] from the Business Halacha Institute, [https://www.jlaw.com/Articles/bank.html Bankruptcy: A Halakhic Perspective] by Rabbi Yitzchok Breitowitz, and [http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/bankruptcy.html Bankruptcy - A Viable Halachic Option?] by Steven H. Resnicoff </ref>
==Guidelines==
# No distinction is made between wages owed to a penniless worker who depends on his employer or a wealthy worker who is financially independent.<ref>Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 96 </ref>
# No distinction is made between small and large amounts of money owed to a worker<ref>Ahavat Chesed introduction to Perek 9, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97</ref>
# The obligation to pay an employee who finishes the work during the day commences at the beginning of the night, and the employee must be paid by dawn. Conversely, if the employee finishes the job at night, the obligation commences at the beginning of the morning, and the employee must be paid by sunset.<ref> Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:3. Although the technical obligation is to pay by dark, since it is not precisely clear when it first gets dark halakhically, it is best to pay by sunset (Rabbi Ari Marburger, Business Halacha, p. 176).</ref> However, if the employee who works during the day finishes before the day ends, the employee must be paid by sunset. <ref>Ahavat Chesed 9:2.</ref>
# The obligation to pay an employee who finishes the work during the day commences at the beginning of the night, and the employee must be paid by dawn. Conversely, if the employee finishes the job at night, the obligation commences at the beginning of the morning, and the employee must be paid by sunset.<ref> Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:3. Although the technical obligation is to pay by dark, since it is not precisely clear when it first gets dark halakhically, it is best to pay by sunset (Rabbi Ari Marburger, Business Halacha, p. 176).</ref> However, if the employee who works during the day finishes before the day ends, the employee must be paid by sunset. <ref>Ahavat Chesed 9:2.</ref>
# When the employee earns a salary at the end of agreed upon periods, the employer must pay by that date.<ref>Business Halacha, p. 176.</ref>
# When the employee earns a salary at the end of agreed upon periods, the employer must pay by that date.<ref>Business Halacha, p. 176.</ref>
Line 6: Line 10:
# Partial payments are subject to the prohibition of delaying payment.<ref> Ahavat Chesed, 9:10</ref>
# Partial payments are subject to the prohibition of delaying payment.<ref> Ahavat Chesed, 9:10</ref>
# If an employer delays payment illegally, the prohibition only applies at that moment and is not continuous. However, the employer still must pay as soon as possible.<ref>Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:8, based on the verse “Say not to your neighbor, Go, and come back, and tomorrow I will give, when you have it by you” (Proverbs 3:28).</ref>
# If an employer delays payment illegally, the prohibition only applies at that moment and is not continuous. However, the employer still must pay as soon as possible.<ref>Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:8, based on the verse “Say not to your neighbor, Go, and come back, and tomorrow I will give, when you have it by you” (Proverbs 3:28).</ref>


==Exceptions==
==Exceptions==
Line 13: Line 16:
# Paying by check would not subject one to any violations, unless the employer stipulates payment by cash and that is the norm in that profession.<ref> Business Halacha, p. 186-187. There is a discussion among poskim about whether or not the bank has to be open in order for the prohibition of delaying payment to not be in effect (see Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits, Halachically Speaking, Volume 4, p. 373-374).</ref>
# Paying by check would not subject one to any violations, unless the employer stipulates payment by cash and that is the norm in that profession.<ref> Business Halacha, p. 186-187. There is a discussion among poskim about whether or not the bank has to be open in order for the prohibition of delaying payment to not be in effect (see Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits, Halachically Speaking, Volume 4, p. 373-374).</ref>


==Precedence==
# If one has enough money to pay only one of his workers, he should pay the poor worker first.<ref>Ahavat Chesed 10:8, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97 based on Gemara Baba Metzia 111b</ref> There is a greater responsibility to see that a poor worker gets paid because punishment comes faster if one fails to do so.<ref>Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97</ref>
==Links==
==Links==
* Article on [http://rabbikaganoff.com/paying-workers-on-time-the-mitzvah-of-bal-talin/ Paying Workers on Time: The Mitzvah of Bal Talin] by Rabbi Yirmiyahu Kaganoff
* Article on [http://rabbikaganoff.com/paying-workers-on-time-the-mitzvah-of-bal-talin/ Paying Workers on Time: The Mitzvah of Bal Talin] by Rabbi Yirmiyahu Kaganoff
* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/719701/rabbi-michael-taubes/parshas-ki-seitzei-paying-workers-on-time/ Paying Workers On time] by Rabbi Michael Taubes
* [http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/719701/rabbi-michael-taubes/parshas-ki-seitzei-paying-workers-on-time/ Paying Workers On Time] by Rabbi Michael Taubes


==Sources==
==Sources==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 16:02, 2 June 2019

Mitzva

  1. Paying workers in a timely fashion is a biblical mitzvah.[1]
  2. If an employer completely refuses to pay a worker his wages, in addition to violating Lo Talin, he also violates Oshek.[2] For example, if a business closes, and the employer decides not to pay the last payroll because of the losses, he is in violation of Oshek. [3] Regarding bankruptcy of a corporation, a competent halachic authority should be consulted. see Bankruptcy in Halacha from the Business Halacha Institute, Bankruptcy: A Halakhic Perspective by Rabbi Yitzchok Breitowitz, and Bankruptcy - A Viable Halachic Option? by Steven H. Resnicoff </ref>

Guidelines

  1. No distinction is made between wages owed to a penniless worker who depends on his employer or a wealthy worker who is financially independent.[4]
  2. No distinction is made between small and large amounts of money owed to a worker[5]
  3. The obligation to pay an employee who finishes the work during the day commences at the beginning of the night, and the employee must be paid by dawn. Conversely, if the employee finishes the job at night, the obligation commences at the beginning of the morning, and the employee must be paid by sunset.[6] However, if the employee who works during the day finishes before the day ends, the employee must be paid by sunset. [7]
  4. When the employee earns a salary at the end of agreed upon periods, the employer must pay by that date.[8]
  5. If the employee does not expect or demand the payment at the specified period, the employer is exempt from paying on time.[9]
  6. Partial payments are subject to the prohibition of delaying payment.[10]
  7. If an employer delays payment illegally, the prohibition only applies at that moment and is not continuous. However, the employer still must pay as soon as possible.[11]

Exceptions

  1. If the task has been completed, but the item has not been given to the employer/client, the obligation to pay is not yet in effect until the item is turned over to the employer/client.[12]
  2. Corporations are not subject to the prohibitions of delaying payment.[13] Managers are also not subject to this prohibition unless the wage is being withheld for personal purposes.[14]
  3. Paying by check would not subject one to any violations, unless the employer stipulates payment by cash and that is the norm in that profession.[15]

Precedence

  1. If one has enough money to pay only one of his workers, he should pay the poor worker first.[16] There is a greater responsibility to see that a poor worker gets paid because punishment comes faster if one fails to do so.[17]

Links

Sources

  1. Sefer Hachinuch Mitzva 588Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:1. The Sema there explains that the Talmud (Bava Metzia 111a) derives this from the verse, “At his day you shall give him his hire, nor shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor and sets his heart upon it; lest he cry against you to the Lord, and it should be sin to you” (Devarim 24: 15). While there are potentially five biblical prohibitions in delaying pay, the Sema notes that the Rambam, Tur, and Shulchan Arukh only list one, as five only apply when one does not plan to pay at all (see 339:2). There is also the verse “the wages of he who is hired shall not remain with you all night until the morning” (Vayikra 19:13). Thus this mitzvah is often known as bal talin.It is important to emphasize that the reason for the mitzvah is integral to the mitzvah itself. A guiding factor in this topic should be that people work to make a living, and withholding that living is unfair and immoral, unless, as we will see, the employer and employee operate on consensual terms. see Ahavat Chessed introduction to Perek 9 who bemoans the fact that many people, who are otherwise very ethical, are lax in their observance in this mitzva, and take liberties they would not take in any other area of halacha
  2. Sefer Hachinuch Mitzva 258, Shulchan Aruch CM 359:8, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40
  3. Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 40
  4. Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 96
  5. Ahavat Chesed introduction to Perek 9, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97
  6. Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:3. Although the technical obligation is to pay by dark, since it is not precisely clear when it first gets dark halakhically, it is best to pay by sunset (Rabbi Ari Marburger, Business Halacha, p. 176).
  7. Ahavat Chesed 9:2.
  8. Business Halacha, p. 176.
  9. Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:9-10. For example, if the employer is up front that he/she is unable to pay immediately and the employee consents, the employer does not need to pay at the end of the period.
  10. Ahavat Chesed, 9:10
  11. Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:8, based on the verse “Say not to your neighbor, Go, and come back, and tomorrow I will give, when you have it by you” (Proverbs 3:28).
  12. Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 339:6.
  13. Business Halacha, p.184.
  14. Business Halacha, p. 185, based on Mishnas R’ Aharon (Volume 2, Responsa 73:3). Rabbi Marburger notes, though, that a manager is responsible so long as he or she has the ability to pay; the manager need not use personal money if the company funds are not available.
  15. Business Halacha, p. 186-187. There is a discussion among poskim about whether or not the bank has to be open in order for the prohibition of delaying payment to not be in effect (see Rabbi Moishe Dovid Lebovits, Halachically Speaking, Volume 4, p. 373-374).
  16. Ahavat Chesed 10:8, Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97 based on Gemara Baba Metzia 111b
  17. Halachos of Other People's Money pg. 97