Naming Children: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
(two names)
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
# If the child is the product of a broken marriage, some recommend not naming the baby for members of either family to avoid aggravation from the opposite side.<ref>Chashukei Chemed Gittin 26b</ref>
# If the child is the product of a broken marriage, some recommend not naming the baby for members of either family to avoid aggravation from the opposite side.<ref>Chashukei Chemed Gittin 26b</ref>
# Ultimately, every family should follow its custom.<ref>Shaarei Halacha uMinhag vol. 3 Yoreh Deah pg 297</ref>
# Ultimately, every family should follow its custom.<ref>Shaarei Halacha uMinhag vol. 3 Yoreh Deah pg 297</ref>
==Giving a Child Two Names==
=Giving a Child Two Names=
# Although it’s unclear when the practice of giving a child two names began, as we don’t find anybody in Tanach, Shas, or even Rishonim (except for one exception) with two names, it certainly has become commonplace to do so.<ref> Noda BeYehuda (Orach Chaim II 123), Chatam Sofer (Even HaEzer II 18)</ref>
# Although it’s unclear when the practice of giving a child two names began, as we don’t find anybody in Tanach, Shas, or even Rishonim (except for one exception) with two names, it certainly has become commonplace to do so.<ref> Noda BeYehuda (Orach Chaim II 123), Chatam Sofer (Even HaEzer II 18)</ref>
# Adding or modifying a name avoids issues of naming after living relatives or people whom one should not name after, such as a Rasha or someone who died young/tragically, according to those who are concerned.<ref>See above sources about naming after the living concerns and Torat Chesed (Even HaEzer 39)</ref> However, according to some, a double name is one composite name and not two partial ones, so it does not bear any connection to the two parts it represents. Therefore, one would not be in fulfillment of honoring anybody by using two names.<ref>Chazon Ish as reported in Pe’er HaDor vol. 4 page 200, Teshuvot veHanhagot (vol. 1 606, 608), Orchot Rabbeinu (vol. 4 Keriat Shem 5 in the new edition, and vol. 3 Brit Milah 3 in the old edition)</ref> Many authorities disagree, though,<ref>Ben Ish Chai (Shanah II, Shofetim 27), Yam Shel Shelomo (Gittin 4:31)</ref> but some say that using two names for two people would nevertheless not be as potent as purely naming after one person.<ref>Shalmei Simcha page 452</ref>. Indeed, this may be parallel to a similar discussion in Hilchot Gittin regarding the same issue of whether one name is two names or one composite one<ref>See Shulchan Aruch (Even HaEzer 129) and commentary, as well as Sdei Chemed (vol. 6 Maarechet Get Siman 35-36), and Avnei Nezer (Even HaEzer 175) at great length</ref>, some think it's an independent issue.<ref>Mishpat HaKetubah vol. 2 pages 86, 139</ref>
# Adding or modifying a name avoids issues of naming after living relatives or people whom one should not name after, such as a Rasha or someone who died young/tragically, according to those who are concerned.<ref>See above sources about naming after the living concerns and Torat Chesed (Even HaEzer 39)</ref> However, according to some, a double name is one composite name and not two partial ones, so it does not bear any connection to the two parts it represents. Therefore, one would not be in fulfillment of honoring anybody by using two names.<ref>Chazon Ish as reported in Pe’er HaDor vol. 4 page 200, Teshuvot veHanhagot (vol. 1 606, 608), Orchot Rabbeinu (vol. 4 Keriat Shem 5 in the new edition, and vol. 3 Brit Milah 3 in the old edition)</ref> Many authorities disagree, though,<ref>Ben Ish Chai (Shanah II, Shofetim 27), Yam Shel Shelomo (Gittin 4:31)</ref> but some say that using two names for two people would nevertheless not be as potent as purely naming after one person.<ref>Shalmei Simcha page 452</ref>. Indeed, this may be parallel to a similar discussion in Hilchot Gittin regarding the same issue of whether one name is two names or one composite one<ref>See Shulchan Aruch (Even HaEzer 129) and commentary, as well as Sdei Chemed (vol. 6 Maarechet Get Siman 35-36), and Avnei Nezer (Even HaEzer 175) at great length</ref>, some think it's an independent issue.<ref>Mishpat HaKetubah vol. 2 pages 86, 139</ref>
Line 28: Line 28:




==Further Reading==
=Further Reading=
# Shalmei Simcha chapter 67
# Shalmei Simcha chapter 67
# [https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/735718/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/choosing-a-name-for-a-child/ Choosing a Name for a Child] by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz
# [https://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/735718/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/choosing-a-name-for-a-child/ Choosing a Name for a Child] by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz


==Sources==
=Sources=
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist|30em}}
[[Category:Lifecycles]]
[[Category:Lifecycles]]

Revision as of 23:13, 10 December 2019

Names should only be a happy topic that elevates us and serves as a connection to the souls of great members of the Jewish people, not a source of strife and cause of Machaloket. There are many laws and customs regarding the names we give our children. Some are meant to maintain peace between the families, while others have the well-being of the child in mind.

Naming After the Living

  1. Generally speaking, Ashkenazim do not name children after living people[1] for fear of shortening the other person's life[2] or to avoid violating a living parent's honor by calling the child the same name as the parent in his presence.[3]
  2. Some say that if there is no reason to pick a particular name, even Ashkenazim are advised to choose the name of one of the Neviim or a recognized Tzaddik and genius of our times, even if he's still alive.[4]
  3. Sepharadim in general have the custom to name children after living relatives, starting with the father’s parents and then the mother’s, unless there are additional factors such as a loss of the mother’s parent, in which case the paternal grandfather’s Mechilah would be needed.[5]
  4. If one is naming after both parents (such as to appease everybody), the name of the paternal father should come first.[6]
  5. Even by Sepharadim this Minhag is not ubiquitous. In Morocco and Iraq, specifically, they would not name after the living, while in Algeria and Tunis, they would. Some say that if the living relative gives permission, it's nevertheless ok in any location.[7]
  6. In the case of a mixed marriage, where the mother of the baby’s family does allow it, but the father's does not, the baby may be named for its mother’s living family members.[8]
  7. If the child is the product of a broken marriage, some recommend not naming the baby for members of either family to avoid aggravation from the opposite side.[9]
  8. Ultimately, every family should follow its custom.[10]

Giving a Child Two Names

  1. Although it’s unclear when the practice of giving a child two names began, as we don’t find anybody in Tanach, Shas, or even Rishonim (except for one exception) with two names, it certainly has become commonplace to do so.[11]
  2. Adding or modifying a name avoids issues of naming after living relatives or people whom one should not name after, such as a Rasha or someone who died young/tragically, according to those who are concerned.[12] However, according to some, a double name is one composite name and not two partial ones, so it does not bear any connection to the two parts it represents. Therefore, one would not be in fulfillment of honoring anybody by using two names.[13] Many authorities disagree, though,[14] but some say that using two names for two people would nevertheless not be as potent as purely naming after one person.[15]. Indeed, this may be parallel to a similar discussion in Hilchot Gittin regarding the same issue of whether one name is two names or one composite one[16], some think it's an independent issue.[17]
  3. Having two names is therefore relevant to the following scenarios:
    1. Naming a baby
      1. after two people
      2. after a living person with an added name
      3. after a Rasha with an added name
      4. after someone who died young with an added name
      5. with the same name as his late parent or sibling with an added name
    2. Marrying someone with the same name as one’s parent but with an added name
    3. Writing one’s name in a Ketubah, Get, or other contract
      1. Partially
      2. Inverted
      3. On two lines
    4. Which Pesukim to recite at the end of the Amidah for those who recite a Pasuk that begins and ends with the first and last letters of one’s name.


Further Reading

  1. Shalmei Simcha chapter 67
  2. Choosing a Name for a Child by Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz

Sources

  1. Sefer HaChassidim 460
  2. Yehuda Ya’aleh (vol. 2 Even HaEzer, Choshen Mishpat 106; Yoreh Deah 246)
  3. Sdei Chemed (Chattan veKallah 5), Chelkat Yaakov Yoreh Deah Siman 136, Aseh Lecha Rav 2:57 and 6:69
  4. Iggerot Moshe (Orach Chaim 4:66). See Minchat Elazar vol. 4 Siman 27 and Beis Yitzchok 5747 page 5
  5. Yabia Omer vol. 5 Yoreh De’ah 21, Yalkut Yosef (Sova Semachot vol. 2 10:2)
  6. Ben Ish Chai (Shanah II Shoftim 27), Yalkut Yosef (Sova Semachot vol. 2 10:3)
  7. Netivot HaMaarav pg 139, Nahagu Ha’Am Shonot 7, Ateret Avot vol. 3 pg. 80, HalachaYomit.co.il
  8. Yabia Omer vol. 5 Yoreh De’ah 21, Yalkut Yosef (Sova Semachot vol. 2 10:4), Shalmei Simcha page 458
  9. Chashukei Chemed Gittin 26b
  10. Shaarei Halacha uMinhag vol. 3 Yoreh Deah pg 297
  11. Noda BeYehuda (Orach Chaim II 123), Chatam Sofer (Even HaEzer II 18)
  12. See above sources about naming after the living concerns and Torat Chesed (Even HaEzer 39)
  13. Chazon Ish as reported in Pe’er HaDor vol. 4 page 200, Teshuvot veHanhagot (vol. 1 606, 608), Orchot Rabbeinu (vol. 4 Keriat Shem 5 in the new edition, and vol. 3 Brit Milah 3 in the old edition)
  14. Ben Ish Chai (Shanah II, Shofetim 27), Yam Shel Shelomo (Gittin 4:31)
  15. Shalmei Simcha page 452
  16. See Shulchan Aruch (Even HaEzer 129) and commentary, as well as Sdei Chemed (vol. 6 Maarechet Get Siman 35-36), and Avnei Nezer (Even HaEzer 175) at great length
  17. Mishpat HaKetubah vol. 2 pages 86, 139