Anonymous

Kaddish: Difference between revisions

From Halachipedia
564 bytes added ,  31 July 2017
Line 29: Line 29:
# A congregation may learn words of the Oral Torah and then say "kaddish al yisrael". <ref> BI"H, Vayechi, 8 </ref>
# A congregation may learn words of the Oral Torah and then say "kaddish al yisrael". <ref> BI"H, Vayechi, 8 </ref>
===If Kaddish was Recited Mistakenly===
===If Kaddish was Recited Mistakenly===
# If a congregation mistakenly said kaddish titkabel after shemona esrei on Friday night before Vayichulu and Mein Sheva they would say Vayichulu and Mein Sheva after the kaddish and then say kaddish titkabel afterwards since the Mein Sheva is a conclusion of the tefillah and requires a kaddish titkabel afterwards.<ref>Igrot Moshe 4:70:13. [https://www.ykr.org.il/modules/Ask/answer/16021 Rav Yitzchak Mazuz] writes that this depends on the dispute in Mishna Brurah 693:1.</ref>
# On Friday night, if a congregation mistakenly said kaddish titkabel after shemona esrei before Vayichulu and Mein Sheva they would say Vayichulu and Mein Sheva after the kaddish and then say kaddish titkabel afterwards since the Mein Sheva is a conclusion of the tefillah and requires a kaddish titkabel afterwards.<ref>Igrot Moshe 4:70:13. [https://www.ykr.org.il/modules/Ask/answer/16021 Rav Yitzchak Mazuz] writes that this depends on the dispute in Mishna Brurah 693:1.</ref>
# If a congregation mistakenly said after tachanun kaddish titkabel, according to Sephardim, they should say after ashrei and uva letzion the kaddish titkabel<ref>Rav Shlomo Mazuz in Simchat Cohen OC 28, Yalkut Yosef (Tefillah v. 2 132:8). Yalkut Yosef explains that it makes sense to say titkabel again after uva letzion since the uva letzion includes kedusha and several tefillot. This is connected to the opinion of the Eliyah Rabba 693:5.</ref>, while according to Ashkenazim they should say full kaddish without titkabel.<ref>Bet Shlomo (responsa 52). He also connects this with the dispute regarding Purim night and says that the Ashkenazic minhag is like the Magen Avraham.</ref>
# At Shacharit, if a congregation mistakenly said after tachanun kaddish titkabel, according to Sephardim, they should say after ashrei and uva letzion the kaddish titkabel<ref>Rav Shlomo Mazuz in Simchat Cohen OC 28, Yalkut Yosef (Tefillah v. 2 132:8). Yalkut Yosef explains that it makes sense to say titkabel again after uva letzion since the uva letzion includes kedusha and several tefillot. This is connected to the opinion of the Eliyah Rabba 693:5.</ref>, while according to Ashkenazim they should say full kaddish without titkabel.<ref>Bet Shlomo (responsa 52), Chelek Levi 48, Rivevot Efraim 6:65, Yesodei Yeshurun (v. 1 p. 240). Bet Shlomo and all the others also connect this with the dispute regarding Purim night and says that the Ashkenazic minhag is like the Magen Avraham.</ref>
# If a congregation on Motzei Shabbat recited kaddish titkabel after Shemona Esrei and then said [[Uva Letzion]] they should only say half kaddish afterwards.<ref>Mishneh Halachot 6:16 writes that in this case only a half kaddish should be recited since titkabel is specifically for shemona esrei. His proof is the Levush 55:1 who writes that kaddish titkabel was instituted specifically to be said after shemona esrei. His only limitation of the Levush is selichot where we say titkabel at the end even though there was no shemona esrei. See Bet Shlomo 52 who disregards the idea of only saying half kaddish and is in favor of saying full kaddish.
# On Motzei Shabbat, if a congregation recited kaddish titkabel after Shemona Esrei and then said [[Uva Letzion]] according to Ashkenazim they should say kaddish without titkabel afterwards.<ref>Rivevot Efraim 2:125:8 writes that since they already said kaddish titkabel on the shemona esrei they should just recite a full kaddish without titkabel after uva letzion. He compares it to the machloket between the Eliyah Rabba and Magen Avraham 693:1. Since the Ashekanzic minhag is like the Magen Avraham they should said kaddish without titkabel. However, Mishneh Halachot 6:16 writes that in this case only a half kaddish should be recited since titkabel is specifically for shemona esrei. His proof is the Levush 55:1 who writes that kaddish titkabel was instituted specifically to be said after shemona esrei. His only limitation of the Levush is selichot where we say titkabel at the end even though there was no shemona esrei. See Bet Shlomo 52 who disregards the idea of only saying half kaddish and is in favor of saying full kaddish because ashrei and uva letzion is no worse than shir shel yom.
  [https://www.ykr.org.il/modules/Ask/answer/16021 Rav Yitzchak Mazuz] writes that this depends on the dispute in Mishna Brurah 693:1.</ref>
  [https://www.ykr.org.il/modules/Ask/answer/16021 Rav Yitzchak Mazuz] writes that this depends on the dispute in Mishna Brurah 693:1.</ref>
# On Chanuka, if a congregation mistakenly said kaddish titkabel after Hallel then after kriyat hatorah and uva letzion, according to Ashkenazim they should say full kaddish without titkabel and according to Sephardim kaddish titkabel.<ref>Otzar Halachot (Moadim v. 2 p. 58) based on Bet Shlomo 2:52</ref>
# On Chanuka, if a congregation mistakenly said kaddish titkabel after Hallel then after kriyat hatorah and uva letzion, according to Ashkenazim they should say full kaddish without titkabel and according to Sephardim kaddish titkabel.<ref>Otzar Halachot (Moadim v. 2 p. 58) based on Bet Shlomo 2:52</ref>