Yashan - Revision history

YitzchakSultan1 at 18:31, 13 July 2023

2023-07-13T18:31:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 13 July 2023
Line 45:		Line 45:
	<references/>		<references/>
	[[Category:Kashrut]]		[[Category:Kashrut]]
			{{Kashrut}}

Unknown user: /* Grain of non-Jews */ correcting a source

2021-03-15T10:04:11Z

Grain of non-Jews: correcting a source

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 15 March 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	# In [[Israel]] the grains are grown in the winter and aren’t harvested until [[Pesach]], whereas, in Europe and America, grains are also grown during the spring (many a time after [[Pesach]]). <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 446). </ref>		# In [[Israel]] the grains are grown in the winter and aren’t harvested until [[Pesach]], whereas, in Europe and America, grains are also grown during the spring (many a time after [[Pesach]]). <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 446). </ref>
	==Grain of non-Jews==		==Grain of non-Jews==
	# According to most authorities this prohibition also applies to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref> Most Rishonim hold that Chaddash also applies to grain that was grown by non-Jews. These Rishonim include Tosfot (Avoda Zara 63b s.v. Ein), Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), Rosh (2:1) quoting the Rif (Kiddushin 16a), Avi Ezri (Siman 527), Sh”t HaRashba 1:177, and Meiri Pesachim 121b. However, a small minority of Rishonim (Tosfot Yeshanim ([[Rosh Hashana]] 13b) in name of the Ritzva, Sh”t HaRosh (beginning of Klal 2) quoting Rabbenu Baruch, Bach Y”D ~~493~~) hold that it doesn’t apply to grain grown by non-Jews. S”A Y”D 293:2 writes that Chaddash applies to grain of a non-Jew. </ref>		# According to most authorities this prohibition also applies to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref> Most Rishonim hold that Chaddash also applies to grain that was grown by non-Jews. These Rishonim include Tosfot (Avoda Zara 63b s.v. Ein), Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), Rosh (2:1) quoting the Rif (Kiddushin 16a), Avi Ezri (Siman 527), Sh”t HaRashba 1:177, and Meiri Pesachim 121b. However, a small minority of Rishonim (Tosfot Yeshanim ([[Rosh Hashana]] 13b) in name of the Ritzva, Sh”t HaRosh (beginning of Klal 2) quoting Rabbenu Baruch, Bach Y”D 293) hold that it doesn’t apply to grain grown by non-Jews. S”A Y”D 293:2 writes that Chaddash applies to grain of a non-Jew. </ref>

	==Defense of the Minhag HaOlam==		==Defense of the Minhag HaOlam==
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about [[Chadash]]. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about [[Chadash]]. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>

Dlhanon: Text replacement - "Magan" to "Magen"

2015-03-30T20:14:58Z

Text replacement - "Magan" to "Magen"

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 30 March 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	# Only the five species of grain are forbidden which are usually translated as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <Ref>Mishna [[Challah]] 1:1, Rambam Maachalot Asurot 10:2, Tur and S”A Y”D 293:1 </ref>		# Only the five species of grain are forbidden which are usually translated as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <Ref>Mishna [[Challah]] 1:1, Rambam Maachalot Asurot 10:2, Tur and S”A Y”D 293:1 </ref>
	==Extent of the prohibition==		==Extent of the prohibition==
	# There’s a dispute whether the pots which were used to cook Chaddash take on a prohibited status from the absorbed taste. <Ref>Sh”t HaRama 132(15) writes that one may be lenient regarding vessels which were used to cook Chaddash. This is quoted by the ~~Magan~~ Avraham 489:17. The Mishna Brurah 489:48 adds that one should only rely on this if it has been 24 hours since the vessels were used. This is also the ruling of Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 439). </ref>		# There’s a dispute whether the pots which were used to cook Chaddash take on a prohibited status from the absorbed taste. <Ref>Sh”t HaRama 132(15) writes that one may be lenient regarding vessels which were used to cook Chaddash. This is quoted by the Magen Avraham 489:17. The Mishna Brurah 489:48 adds that one should only rely on this if it has been 24 hours since the vessels were used. This is also the ruling of Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 439). </ref>
	# There’s a dispute whether Chaddash applies to drinks made from the grain of the new crop. <Ref> The Taz Y”D 293:4 and Peni Yehoshua (Kuntres Acharon on Kiddushin) defend those who drink beverages that are produced from Chaddash grain. However, the Chacham Tzvi 20 and Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 447) is strict. </ref>		# There’s a dispute whether Chaddash applies to drinks made from the grain of the new crop. <Ref> The Taz Y”D 293:4 and Peni Yehoshua (Kuntres Acharon on Kiddushin) defend those who drink beverages that are produced from Chaddash grain. However, the Chacham Tzvi 20 and Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 447) is strict. </ref>
	==Getting benefit from Chaddash==		==Getting benefit from Chaddash==
Line 36:		Line 36:
	* The Beiur Halacha (489:10 s.v. Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.		* The Beiur Halacha (489:10 s.v. Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.
	* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>		* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>
	# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that [[Chadash]] is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>~~Magan~~ Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>		# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that [[Chadash]] is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>Magen Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>
	# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that hold that grain which was grown by non-Jews is exempt from [[Chadash]]. <Ref>The Kitzur S”A 173:3 defends those who are lenient regarding Chaddash by saying that they rely on those who say the grain of a non-Jew is exempt from Chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45 who adds that if one relies on this one should be more strict regarding grain that was grown by Jewish farmers. However, the Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 427), argues that since Shulchan Aruch holds that it also applies to grain of a non-Jew, Sephardim shouldn’t be lenient using this leniency. </ref>		# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that hold that grain which was grown by non-Jews is exempt from [[Chadash]]. <Ref>The Kitzur S”A 173:3 defends those who are lenient regarding Chaddash by saying that they rely on those who say the grain of a non-Jew is exempt from Chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45 who adds that if one relies on this one should be more strict regarding grain that was grown by Jewish farmers. However, the Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 427), argues that since Shulchan Aruch holds that it also applies to grain of a non-Jew, Sephardim shouldn’t be lenient using this leniency. </ref>
	# Lastly, some defend the minhag with a different double doubt, perhaps the grain one has is grain from last year and perhaps the law of [[Chadash]] doesn’t apply to grain that grew in the Diaspora or to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref>The Or Letzion Y”D 1:15 writes that one should only rely on this leniency on [[Shabbat]] and [[Yom Tov]]. However, Yalkut Yosef (Y”D 293:31, Hilchot [[Chadash]] VeShatnez 293:31 pg 469) writes that the strict law is that this leniency is reliable in places where there’s no bakery that offers old grain. </ref>		# Lastly, some defend the minhag with a different double doubt, perhaps the grain one has is grain from last year and perhaps the law of [[Chadash]] doesn’t apply to grain that grew in the Diaspora or to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref>The Or Letzion Y”D 1:15 writes that one should only rely on this leniency on [[Shabbat]] and [[Yom Tov]]. However, Yalkut Yosef (Y”D 293:31, Hilchot [[Chadash]] VeShatnez 293:31 pg 469) writes that the strict law is that this leniency is reliable in places where there’s no bakery that offers old grain. </ref>

Ezralevy at 05:46, 23 February 2014

2014-02-23T05:46:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:46, 23 February 2014
Line 31:		Line 31:
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about [[Chadash]]. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about [[Chadash]]. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>
	* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.		* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.
	* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b s.v. Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (~~{{ibid}}.~~) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before [[Pesach]], but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (~~{{ibid}}.~~) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (~~{{ibid}}.~~) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.		* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b s.v. Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (Kiddushin 36b) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before [[Pesach]], but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (Machalot Asurot 10:3) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.

YitzchakSultan at 20:58, 11 February 2014

2014-02-11T20:58:05Z

Show changes

YitzchakSultan: Text replace - "ibid" to "{{ibid}}"

2014-02-09T01:42:44Z

Text replace - "ibid" to "{{ibid}}"

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:42, 9 February 2014
Line 31:		Line 31:
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>
	* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.		* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.
	* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b s.v. Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.		* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b s.v. Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot ({{ibid}}.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah ({{ibid}}.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon ({{ibid}}.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.

YitzchakSultan: Text replace - " D(.*)H " to " s.v. "

2014-01-15T21:51:31Z

Text replace - " D(.*)H " to " s.v. "

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 15 January 2014
Line 27:		Line 27:
	# In Israel the grains are grown in the winter and aren’t harvested until Pesach, whereas, in Europe and America, grains are also grown during the spring (many a time after Pesach). <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 446). </ref>		# In Israel the grains are grown in the winter and aren’t harvested until Pesach, whereas, in Europe and America, grains are also grown during the spring (many a time after Pesach). <Ref> Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 446). </ref>
	==Grain of non-Jews==		==Grain of non-Jews==
	# According to most authorities this prohibition also applies to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref> Most Rishonim hold that Chaddash also applies to grain that was grown by non-Jews. These Rishonim include Tosfot (Avoda Zara 63b ~~D”H~~ Ein), Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), Rosh (2:1) quoting the Rif (Kiddushin 16a), Avi Ezri (Siman 527), Sh”t HaRashba 1:177, and Meiri Pesachim 121b. However, a small minority of Rishonim (Tosfot Yeshanim ([[Rosh Hashana]] 13b) in name of the Ritzva, Sh”t HaRosh (beginning of Klal 2) quoting Rabbenu Baruch, Bach Y”D 493) hold that it doesn’t apply to grain grown by non-Jews. S”A Y”D 293:2 writes that Chaddash applies to grain of a non-Jew. </ref>		# According to most authorities this prohibition also applies to grain that was grown by a non-Jew. <Ref> Most Rishonim hold that Chaddash also applies to grain that was grown by non-Jews. These Rishonim include Tosfot (Avoda Zara 63b s.v. Ein), Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), Rosh (2:1) quoting the Rif (Kiddushin 16a), Avi Ezri (Siman 527), Sh”t HaRashba 1:177, and Meiri Pesachim 121b. However, a small minority of Rishonim (Tosfot Yeshanim ([[Rosh Hashana]] 13b) in name of the Ritzva, Sh”t HaRosh (beginning of Klal 2) quoting Rabbenu Baruch, Bach Y”D 493) hold that it doesn’t apply to grain grown by non-Jews. S”A Y”D 293:2 writes that Chaddash applies to grain of a non-Jew. </ref>
	==Defense of the Minhag HaOlam==		==Defense of the Minhag HaOlam==
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>
	* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.		* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.
	* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b ~~D”H~~ Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.		* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b s.v. Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.
	* The Beiur Halacha (489:10 ~~D”H~~ Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.		* The Beiur Halacha (489:10 s.v. Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.
	* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>		* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>
	# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that Chadash is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>Magan Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>		# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that Chadash is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>Magan Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>

YitzchakSultan: Text replace - "Biur Halacha" to "Beiur Halacha"

2014-01-15T21:38:50Z

Text replace - "Biur Halacha" to "Beiur Halacha"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 15 January 2014
Line 34:		Line 34:
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.
	* The ~~Biur~~ Halacha (489:10 D”H Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.		* The Beiur Halacha (489:10 D”H Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.
	* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>		* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>
	# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that Chadash is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>Magan Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>		# Another defense is that the minhag relies on the opinions that Chadash is Derabbanan and only applies in the lands near Eretz Yisrael. <Ref>Magan Avraham 489:17 writes this as a defense of those who aren’t strict about chaddash. This is also quoted by the Mishna Brurah 489:45. </ref>

YitzchakSultan at 21:03, 2 May 2013

2013-05-02T21:03:31Z

Nisan at 07:45, 26 April 2013

2013-04-26T07:45:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:45, 26 April 2013
Line 31:		Line 31:
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>
	* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.		* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.
	* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b D”H Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barely one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barely that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding ~~barely~~ because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barely prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barely is used infrequently one should publicize that ~~barely~~ which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.		* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b D”H Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barely one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barely that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barely prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barely is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barely, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barely, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 2 May 2013
Line 14:		Line 14:
	# Grain which took root after the 16th of Nissan is called Chadash and is forbidden to eat until the 17th of Nissan in Israel and until the 18th of Nissan in the Diaspora. <Ref>S”A Y”D 293:1 and O”C 489:10, Kitzur S”A 172:1 </ref>		# Grain which took root after the 16th of Nissan is called Chadash and is forbidden to eat until the 17th of Nissan in Israel and until the 18th of Nissan in the Diaspora. <Ref>S”A Y”D 293:1 and O”C 489:10, Kitzur S”A 172:1 </ref>
	# There’s a dispute whether we can assume that grain has taken root after 3 days or only after 2 weeks. <Ref>Sh”t Trumat HaDeshen 1:191 writes that it only takes 3 days for the plant to take root, while the Meiri Pesachim 55b writes that it takes two weeks. See further in Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 441-2). </ref>		# There’s a dispute whether we can assume that grain has taken root after 3 days or only after 2 weeks. <Ref>Sh”t Trumat HaDeshen 1:191 writes that it only takes 3 days for the plant to take root, while the Meiri Pesachim 55b writes that it takes two weeks. See further in Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 441-2). </ref>
	# Only the five species of grain are forbidden which are usually translated as wheat, ~~barely~~, spelt, oat, and rye. <Ref>Mishna Challah 1:1, Rambam Maachalot Asurot 10:2, Tur and S”A Y”D 293:1 </ref>		# Only the five species of grain are forbidden which are usually translated as wheat, barley, spelt, oat, and rye. <Ref>Mishna Challah 1:1, Rambam Maachalot Asurot 10:2, Tur and S”A Y”D 293:1 </ref>
	==Extent of the prohibition==		==Extent of the prohibition==
	# There’s a dispute whether the pots which were used to cook Chaddash take on a prohibited status from the absorbed taste. <Ref>Sh”t HaRama 132(15) writes that one may be lenient regarding vessels which were used to cook Chaddash. This is quoted by the Magan Avraham 489:17. The Mishna Brurah 489:48 adds that one should only rely on this if it has been 24 hours since the vessels were used. This is also the ruling of Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 439). </ref>		# There’s a dispute whether the pots which were used to cook Chaddash take on a prohibited status from the absorbed taste. <Ref>Sh”t HaRama 132(15) writes that one may be lenient regarding vessels which were used to cook Chaddash. This is quoted by the Magan Avraham 489:17. The Mishna Brurah 489:48 adds that one should only rely on this if it has been 24 hours since the vessels were used. This is also the ruling of Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 439). </ref>
Line 31:		Line 31:
	# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>		# There are some who defend the widespread minhag to be lenient about Chadash. One defense is that some say there is a double doubt, perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan, however, many disregard this logic. <Ref>
	* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.		* Sh”t HaRosh 2:1 writes that in many years one doesn’t have to be concerned about grain one doesn’t know whether it is Chaddash or Yashan because the majority of the grain on the market is the old crop and furthermore there’s a double Safek (doubt), perhaps the grain one has was grown last year and even if it grew this year perhaps it took root before the 16th of Nissan. However, in this year there were pogroms before [[Pesach]] which prevented the (Jewish) farmers from growing grain before [[Pesach]] and so only a minority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]]. The Rosh writes that as he looks towards heaven in the difficult times he was unable to forbid all the grain that year, but rather would answer the questioners that they should ask the farmers whether the majority of the grain was grown before [[Pesach]] and if so it’d be permitted. But nonetheless it’s better that the people should be uninformed and not sin intentional. This is quoted in the Tur Y”D 293.
	* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b D”H Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by ~~barely~~ one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from ~~barely~~ that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant ~~barely~~ prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and ~~barely~~ is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.		* The former logic of relying on majority on grain that is from the old crop is widely accepted in the Rishonim including the Tosfot Kiddushin 36b D”H Kol, Mordechai Menachot 501, Ravyah (Pesachim Siman 527), and Hagahot Maimoniot (Machalot Asurot 10:3). Tosfot (ibid.) writes concerning wheat one could be lenient because the majority is planted before Pesach, but that by barley one should be strict because it’s growing season is after [[Pesach]]. The Ravyah (ibid.) writes that the majority of the beer was made from barley that was from the old grain and so one could be lenient. The Hagahot Maimon (ibid.) writes that the Maharam was strict regarding barley because of it’s late growing season. * The Trumat HaDeshen (Siman 191) writes that in years when there was snow on the ground and the farmers weren’t able to plant barley prior to [[Pesach]] that in countries that primarily drink beer one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition and it’s better that the masses are uninformed rather than intentionally sin. However, in countries that the primary drink is wine and barley is used infrequently one should publicize that barley which one doesn’t know whether it’s from the new grain or the old grain one should be strict. In the end, the Trumat HaDeshen rejects the double safek of the Rosh and says that it’s only considered a single safek and isn’t accepted if the minority of the grain is from the new crop.
	* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.		* The Rama Y”D 293:3 rules like the Trumat HaDeshen that one should really only rely on the double safek if there’s also a majority of grain that’s from the old crop, but nonetheless, if the primary food and drink is from the new grain one shouldn’t publicize the prohibition.
	* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning ~~barely~~, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.		* The Mishna Brurah 489:45 writes that the Achronim hold in Poland one shouldn’t be lenient concerning barley, oat, and spelt because the majority of these come from new grain, but one may be lenient regarding wheat and rye which a majority is from the old grain. The Mishna Brurah concludes that even though one can’t be strict on the masses one a righteous individual should be strict on himself.
	* The Biur Halacha (489:10 D”H Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.		* The Biur Halacha (489:10 D”H Af) writes that someone mistakenly think that if they are going to be strict about this prohibition, they have to be strict on everything entailed in the prohibition, on all grains, on drinks, and pots used for Chaddash, however, it’s much more proper to recognize that there’s what to rely on in many of the disputed cases such as drinks, pots used for Chaddash, and also the majority of many grains are grown before [[Pesach]] and so, one should endeavor to be strict at least in cases of certain Chaddash, but even in such cases one can’t rebuke the masses.
	* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>		* The Yalkut Yosef (Shaatnez UChaddash pg 460) writes that one may be lenient if one doesn’t know if the grain one has is old grain in a place where the majority of the grain is from the old crop. </ref>