Ran - Revision history

Unknown user: Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim"

2020-08-12T12:29:38Z

Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 12 August 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:~~Klalim~~]]		[[Category:Klalei Haposkim]]

MordechaiD: article

2019-06-02T03:27:50Z

article

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 2 June 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Klalim=		=Klalim=
			''See R' Eliyahu Lichtenstein's comprehensive article on the Ran's bibliography, published in the Chiddushei HaRan on Avodah Zarah''
	==General==		==General==
	# The Ran was a contemporary of the [[Maggid Mishneh]] and teacher of the [[Rivash]] and [[Tashbetz]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Nun 12)</ref>		# The Ran was a contemporary of the [[Maggid Mishneh]] and teacher of the [[Rivash]] and [[Tashbetz]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Nun 12)</ref>

MordechaiD: students, rish

2018-10-07T03:52:29Z

students, rish

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 7 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Klalim=		=Klalim=
			==General==
			# The Ran was a contemporary of the [[Maggid Mishneh]] and teacher of the [[Rivash]] and [[Tashbetz]].<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Nun 12)</ref>
	== Style ==		== Style ==
	# For the most part, the Ran and the Rosh's words are the same, especially when elucidating Tosafot's position.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 13)</ref>		# For the most part, the Ran and the Rosh's words are the same, especially when elucidating Tosafot's position,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 13)</ref> but the Ran seldom quotes the Rosh, as the Rosh's work didn't reach the Ran.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Nun 12). See Chiddushei HaRan on Masechet Shabbat (Mossad HaRav Kook edition, page 11)</ref>
			# Tosafot Tuch wasn't available to the Ran until after he completed his commentary on Nedarim.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Nun 12)</ref>
	== Contradictions ==		== Contradictions ==
	# The Ran wrote his Chiddushim on Shas when he was younger and his commentary on the Rif when he was older<ref>Matnat Yado 38</ref>, so it's possible that he came to a deeper understanding of a topic and changed his mind the second time around. Therefore, one should follow the commentary on the Rif if it contradicts the Chiddushim. The Yad Malachi extends this to the Teshuvot, as well.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10)</ref>		# The Ran wrote his Chiddushim on Shas when he was younger and his commentary on the Rif when he was older<ref>Matnat Yado 38</ref>, so it's possible that he came to a deeper understanding of a topic and changed his mind the second time around. Therefore, one should follow the commentary on the Rif if it contradicts the Chiddushim. The Yad Malachi extends this to the Teshuvot, as well.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10)</ref>

MordechaiD: /* Works Not by the Ran */

2018-07-29T15:10:06Z

Works Not by the Ran

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 29 July 2018
Line 6:		Line 6:
	# In terms of internal contradictions, the Ran's style in his commentary on the Rif is to copy sections of Rashi anonymously but write an alternative approach elsewhere. He won't necessarily explicate the fact that he disagrees when quoting Rashi.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 4:1)</ref>		# In terms of internal contradictions, the Ran's style in his commentary on the Rif is to copy sections of Rashi anonymously but write an alternative approach elsewhere. He won't necessarily explicate the fact that he disagrees when quoting Rashi.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 4:1)</ref>
	== Works Not by the Ran ==		== Works Not by the Ran ==
	# Despite some Acharonim referring to the commentary on the side of the Rif on Masechtot Bava Kamma, Bava Metzia, Bava Batra, Makkot, and Moed Kattan as the Ran, they are in fact the Nimukei Yosef.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 12), though the Beit Yosef also writes this way in Choshen Mishpat, perhaps one could argue he knew it was by the Nimukei Yosef but continued to call it the Ran, as that was what common people thought, similar to his attitude towards Shu"t HaRamban HaMeyuchasot that are really the Rashba</ref>		# Despite some Acharonim referring to the commentary on the side of the Rif on Masechtot Bava Kamma, Bava Metzia, Bava Batra, Makkot, and Moed Kattan as the Ran, they are in fact the Nimukei Yosef.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 12), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Yud 128) though the Beit Yosef also writes this way in Choshen Mishpat, perhaps one could argue he knew it was by the Nimukei Yosef but continued to call it the Ran, as that was what common people thought, similar to his attitude towards Shu"t HaRamban HaMeyuchasot that are really the Rashba</ref>

	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:Klalim]]		[[Category:Klalim]]

MordechaiD: Created page with "=Klalim= == Style == # For the most part, the Ran and the Rosh's words are the same, especially when elucidating Tosafot's position.Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 13) ==..."

2018-05-06T16:12:49Z

Created page with "=Klalim= == Style == # For the most part, the Ran and the Rosh's words are the same, especially when elucidating Tosafot's position.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 13)</ref> ==..."

New page

=Klalim=
== Style ==
# For the most part, the Ran and the Rosh's words are the same, especially when elucidating Tosafot's position.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 13)</ref>
== Contradictions ==
# The Ran wrote his Chiddushim on Shas when he was younger and his commentary on the Rif when he was older<ref>Matnat Yado 38</ref>, so it's possible that he came to a deeper understanding of a topic and changed his mind the second time around. Therefore, one should follow the commentary on the Rif if it contradicts the Chiddushim. The Yad Malachi extends this to the Teshuvot, as well.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10)</ref>
# In terms of internal contradictions, the Ran's style in his commentary on the Rif is to copy sections of Rashi anonymously but write an alternative approach elsewhere. He won't necessarily explicate the fact that he disagrees when quoting Rashi.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 10). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 4:1)</ref>
== Works Not by the Ran ==
# Despite some Acharonim referring to the commentary on the side of the Rif on Masechtot Bava Kamma, Bava Metzia, Bava Batra, Makkot, and Moed Kattan as the Ran, they are in fact the Nimukei Yosef.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRan 12), though the Beit Yosef also writes this way in Choshen Mishpat, perhaps one could argue he knew it was by the Nimukei Yosef but continued to call it the Ran, as that was what common people thought, similar to his attitude towards Shu"t HaRamban HaMeyuchasot that are really the Rashba</ref>
=Sources=
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Klalim]]