Rama - Revision history

Unknown user: /* Writing Style */

2022-06-28T14:34:12Z

Writing Style

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 28 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98; Sefarim, Heh 25)</ref>		The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98; Sefarim, Heh 25)</ref>
	=Purpose =		=Purpose=
	# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in [[Shulchan Aruch]], according to the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]]:
	## The [[Beit Yosef]] did not decide between two positions, so the Rama will add a comment deciding which side to take or also not deciding.		#There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in [[Shulchan Aruch]], according to the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]]:
	## The Rama accepts the position rejected by the [[Shulchan Aruch]]		##The [[Beit Yosef]] did not decide between two positions, so the Rama will add a comment deciding which side to take or also not deciding.
	## A Sevara mentioned in [[Beit Yosef]] was omitted from [[Shulchan Aruch]], and the Rama informs us of it, regardless of its acceptance.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 21)</ref>		##The Rama accepts the position rejected by the [[Shulchan Aruch]]
	=Writing Style =		##A Sevara mentioned in [[Beit Yosef]] was omitted from [[Shulchan Aruch]], and the Rama informs us of it, regardless of its acceptance.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 21)</ref>
	# When the Rama writes that "Yesh Machmirim" (יש ~~חמירים~~), it means he leans towards those who are lenient, according to the Chavot Yair.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>		=Writing Style=
	# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
			#When the Rama writes that "Yesh Machmirim" (יש מחמירים), it means he leans towards those who are lenient, according to the Chavot Yair.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
			#A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
			#On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	#Generally when the Rama writes נוהגין that indicates that he accepts and advocates for the minhag and when he writes והעם נהגו that means he's citing a substantial minhag but does not necessarily mean he personally endorses it.<ref>Rama responsa 35</ref>		#Generally when the Rama writes נוהגין that indicates that he accepts and advocates for the minhag and when he writes והעם נהגו that means he's citing a substantial minhag but does not necessarily mean he personally endorses it.<ref>Rama responsa 35</ref>

	= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =		=Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology=
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</~~reF~~>		#Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>		#The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</ref>
	# The Be'er HaGolah admits he did not have a copy of Darkei Moshe.<ref>Be'er HaGolah 2 to Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer 129:14</ref>		#He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>
	== Sources==		#The Be'er HaGolah admits he did not have a copy of Darkei Moshe.<ref>Be'er HaGolah 2 to Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer 129:14</ref>

			==Sources==
	{{Reflist\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}
	[[Category: Klalim]]		[[Category: Klalim]]
			<references />

Unknown user: /* Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology */ availability of darkei moshe

2022-06-20T19:02:26Z

Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology: availability of darkei moshe

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 20 June 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</reF>		# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</reF>
	# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>		# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>
			# The Be'er HaGolah admits he did not have a copy of Darkei Moshe.<ref>Be'er HaGolah 2 to Shulchan Aruch Even HaEzer 129:14</ref>
	== Sources==		== Sources==
	{{Reflist\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}
	[[Category: Klalim]]		[[Category: Klalim]]

Unknown user: /* Writing Style */

2021-04-19T19:17:26Z

Writing Style

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:17, 19 April 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>		# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
	# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>		# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
			#Generally when the Rama writes נוהגין that indicates that he accepts and advocates for the minhag and when he writes והעם נהגו that means he's citing a substantial minhag but does not necessarily mean he personally endorses it.<ref>Rama responsa 35</ref>

	= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =		= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>

MordechaiD: /* Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology */ torat chatat purpose

2019-11-07T04:23:33Z

Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology: torat chatat purpose

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 7 November 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =		= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref>		# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref> Torat Chatat follows the Simanim structure of Shaarei Dura, which the Rama intended to replace, due to the fact that the Shaarei Dura only wrote Chiddushim that he though people in his generation didn't already know. Also, although Shaarei Dura was intended to be a concise guide, the many commentaries on it added so much that each topic is long and confusing. Therefore, the Rama wrote Torat Chatat to cover the basics in a terse way that highlights the practical Halachot one must know.<ref>Introduction to Mossad HaRav Kook edition</reF>
	# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>		# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>

MordechaiD: /* Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology */

2019-08-22T19:18:17Z

Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 22 August 2019
Line 11:		Line 11:
	= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =		= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat ~~HaAAsham~~ by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref>		# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref>
	# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>		# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>

MordechaiD: torat chatat and olah

2019-02-14T02:25:41Z

torat chatat and olah

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 14 February 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>		# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
	# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>		# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	= Contradictions & Chronology =		= Other Works, Contradictions, & Chronology =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	# ~~Also~~, ~~the Rama~~ wrote Torat ~~HaAshem~~		# The Rama wrote a monograph on Issur veHetter called Torat HaChatat along with a condensed version before he wrote his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Torat HaAAsham by the Tosafot Yom Tov and Damesek Eliezer are two of its commentaries.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 37, 40)</ref>
			# He also wrote a work on Korbanot and Middot HaMikdash called Torat HaOlah.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Sefarim, Taf 51)</ref>

	== Sources==		== Sources==
	{{Reflist\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}
	[[Category: Klalim]]		[[Category: Klalim]]

MordechaiD: /* Contradictions */

2019-02-11T06:29:02Z

Contradictions

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 11 February 2019
Line 9:		Line 9:
	# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>		# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
	# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>		# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	= Contradictions =		= Contradictions & Chronology =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
			# Also, the Rama wrote Torat HaAshem
	== Sources==		== Sources==
	{{Reflist\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}
	[[Category: Klalim]]		[[Category: Klalim]]

MordechaiD at 01:31, 9 November 2018

2018-11-09T01:31:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 9 November 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98)</ref>		The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98; Sefarim, Heh 25)</ref>
	=Purpose =		=Purpose =
	# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in [[Shulchan Aruch]], according to the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]]:		# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in [[Shulchan Aruch]], according to the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]]:

MordechaiD: links

2018-09-12T13:58:16Z

links

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 12 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98)</ref>		The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98)</ref>
	=Purpose =		=Purpose =
	# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in Shulchan Aruch, according to the Kenesset HaGedolah:		# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in [[Shulchan Aruch]], according to the [[Kenesset HaGedolah]]:
	## The Beit Yosef did not decide between two positions, so the Rama will add a comment deciding which side to take or also not deciding.		## The [[Beit Yosef]] did not decide between two positions, so the Rama will add a comment deciding which side to take or also not deciding.
	## The Rama accepts the position rejected by the Shulchan Aruch		## The Rama accepts the position rejected by the [[Shulchan Aruch]]
	## A Sevara mentioned in Beit Yosef was omitted from Shulchan Aruch, and the Rama informs us of it, regardless of its acceptance.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 21)</ref>		## A Sevara mentioned in [[Beit Yosef]] was omitted from [[Shulchan Aruch]], and the Rama informs us of it, regardless of its acceptance.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 21)</ref>
	=Writing Style =		=Writing Style =
	# When the Rama writes that "Yesh Machmirim" (יש חמירים), it means he leans towards those who are lenient, according to the Chavot Yair.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>		# When the Rama writes that "Yesh Machmirim" (יש חמירים), it means he leans towards those who are lenient, according to the Chavot Yair.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the Shulchan Aruch agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>		# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the [[Shulchan Aruch]] agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
	# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the Shulchan Aruch.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>		# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the [[Shulchan Aruch]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
	= Contradictions =		= Contradictions =
	# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on Shulchan Aruch in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Therefore, one would follow the comments to Shulchan Aruch over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>		# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on [[Shulchan Aruch]] in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on [[Shulchan Aruch]]. Therefore, one would follow the comments to [[Shulchan Aruch]] over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
	== Sources==		== Sources==
	{{Reflist\|30em}}		{{Reflist\|30em}}
	[[Category: Klalim]]		[[Category: Klalim]]

MordechaiD: move from shulchan aruch page

2018-09-12T13:56:52Z

move from shulchan aruch page

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 12 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[Shulchan Aruch]]		The rulings of Rav Moshe Isserles, the Rama, were accepted across Europe, even against those of the [[Maharshal]]; although, there is room to be strict like the [[Maharshal]]<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Mem 98)</ref>
			=Purpose =
			# There are three primary cases in which the Rama writes a comment in Shulchan Aruch, according to the Kenesset HaGedolah:
			## The Beit Yosef did not decide between two positions, so the Rama will add a comment deciding which side to take or also not deciding.
			## The Rama accepts the position rejected by the Shulchan Aruch
			## A Sevara mentioned in Beit Yosef was omitted from Shulchan Aruch, and the Rama informs us of it, regardless of its acceptance.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 21)</ref>
			=Writing Style =
			# When the Rama writes that "Yesh Machmirim" (יש חמירים), it means he leans towards those who are lenient, according to the Chavot Yair.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
			# A ruling presented Stam, without "Yesh Omrim" is Halacha Pesukah, an unequivocal ruling,<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref> while it doesn't mean the Shulchan Aruch agrees, as there isn't sufficient indication in his words.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 19)</ref>
			# On the other hand, a ruling that opens with "Yesh Omrim" (יש אומרים) means the Rama is being stringent for this other position, although, the statement isn't necessarily working off of the Shulchan Aruch.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 18)</ref>
			= Contradictions =
			# Although the Rama occasionally discusses his comments on Shulchan Aruch in his responsa, the Be'er Sheva contends that it's possible that some of the Teshuvot were written before his glosses on Shulchan Aruch. Therefore, one would follow the comments to Shulchan Aruch over the responsa, if there's a contradiction. Alas, the Yad Malachi is unconvinced by this baseless claim.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRama 20). See Sdei Chemed Klalei HaPoskim 17:7</ref>
			== Sources==
			{{Reflist\|30em}}
			[[Category: Klalim]]