Unknown user: Text replacement - "Sepharadi" to "Sephardi"

2020-07-10T19:07:23Z

Text replacement - "Sepharadi" to "Sephardi"

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 10 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	# Rabbeinu Ovadia MiBartenura authored a well known commentary on the Mishnah and was an Av Beit Din in Yerushalayim. The Radbaz extols his greatness and breadth of knowledge of all the works of the Rishonim. Though he passed away before the age of forty, in his lifetime, all the Rabbanim in Yerushalayim, Ashkenazim and ~~Sepharadim~~, were kefufim to him. His teachers were Ashkenazim<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 35). See his entry in Shem HaGedolim, Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 8:2), Shu"t Beit Yosef Dinei Chalitzah end of Siman 2, and Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>		# Rabbeinu Ovadia MiBartenura authored a well known commentary on the Mishnah and was an Av Beit Din in Yerushalayim. The Radbaz extols his greatness and breadth of knowledge of all the works of the Rishonim. Though he passed away before the age of forty, in his lifetime, all the Rabbanim in Yerushalayim, Ashkenazim and Sephardim, were kefufim to him. His teachers were Ashkenazim<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 35). See his entry in Shem HaGedolim, Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 8:2), Shu"t Beit Yosef Dinei Chalitzah end of Siman 2, and Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
	# The Acharonim are unsure why the Bartenura often elucidates a Mishnah according to the initial understanding (Hava Amina) of the Gemara and not its conclusion (Maskana). Although Rashi does so as well, Rashi's commentary covers both the Mishnah and the Gemara, so explaining the Mishnah according to the initial perspective is appropriate.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>		# The Acharonim are unsure why the Bartenura often elucidates a Mishnah according to the initial understanding (Hava Amina) of the Gemara and not its conclusion (Maskana). Although Rashi does so as well, Rashi's commentary covers both the Mishnah and the Gemara, so explaining the Mishnah according to the initial perspective is appropriate.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>
	# He is drawn after the Rash in terms of understanding the Mishnah.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>		# He is drawn after the Rash in terms of understanding the Mishnah.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>

MordechaiD: bio, hava aminas, rash

2018-06-03T12:34:17Z

bio, hava aminas, rash

New page

# Rabbeinu Ovadia MiBartenura authored a well known commentary on the Mishnah and was an Av Beit Din in Yerushalayim. The Radbaz extols his greatness and breadth of knowledge of all the works of the Rishonim. Though he passed away before the age of forty, in his lifetime, all the Rabbanim in Yerushalayim, Ashkenazim and Sepharadim, were kefufim to him. His teachers were Ashkenazim<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 35). See his entry in Shem HaGedolim, Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 8:2), Shu"t Beit Yosef Dinei Chalitzah end of Siman 2, and Matnat Yado ad loc.</ref>
# The Acharonim are unsure why the Bartenura often elucidates a Mishnah according to the initial understanding (Hava Amina) of the Gemara and not its conclusion (Maskana). Although Rashi does so as well, Rashi's commentary covers both the Mishnah and the Gemara, so explaining the Mishnah according to the initial perspective is appropriate.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>
# He is drawn after the Rash in terms of understanding the Mishnah.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei Shear Mechabrim 36)</ref>
== Sources==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category: Klalim]]

R' Ovadia MiBartenura - Revision history

Unknown user: Text replacement - "Sepharadi" to "Sephardi"

MordechaiD: bio, hava aminas, rash