Maggid Mishneh - Revision history

Unknown user: Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim"

2020-08-11T16:42:21Z

Text replacement - "Category:Klalim" to "Category:Klalei Haposkim"

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 11 August 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:
	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:~~Klalim~~]]		[[Category:Klalei Haposkim]]

Unknown user: Text replacement - ". " to "."

2020-07-12T04:20:51Z

Text replacement - ". <ref>" to ".<ref>"

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:20, 12 July 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	# Rabbeinu Vidal De Tolouse wrote the classic commentary on the Rambam known as [[Maggid Mishneh]].		# Rabbeinu Vidal De Tolouse wrote the classic commentary on the Rambam known as [[Maggid Mishneh]].
	# The [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>		# The [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>
	# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the [[Chidah]] argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref> Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>		# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the [[Chidah]] argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref> Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>
	# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the [[Radbaz]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref>		# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the [[Radbaz]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref>

Unknown user at 17:14, 1 July 2020

2020-07-01T17:14:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 1 July 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the [[Chidah]] argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref> Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>		# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the [[Chidah]] argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref> Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>
	# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the [[Radbaz]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref>		# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the [[Radbaz]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref>
	# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the [[~~Chidah~~]] argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>		# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the [[Chida]] argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# He and the [[Ran]] refer to each other as "Yesh Mi SheKatav."<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4) citing Shu"t [[Maharikash]] Siman 113</ref>		# He and the [[Ran]] refer to each other as "Yesh Mi SheKatav."<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4) citing Shu"t [[Maharikash]] Siman 113</ref>

Unknown user at 17:14, 1 July 2020

2020-07-01T17:14:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 1 July 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the [[Chidah]] argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>		# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the [[Chidah]] argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# He and ~~teh~~ [[Ran]] refer to each other as "Yesh Mi SheKatav."<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4) citing Shu"t [[Maharikash]] Siman 113</ref>		# He and the [[Ran]] refer to each other as "Yesh Mi SheKatav."<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4) citing Shu"t [[Maharikash]] Siman 113</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>
	# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [[Ritva]].		# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [[Ritva]].

MordechaiD: shem hagedolim additions

2018-07-23T05:39:49Z

shem hagedolim additions

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:39, 23 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
			# Rabbeinu Vidal De Tolouse wrote the classic commentary on the Rambam known as [[Maggid Mishneh]].
	# The [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>		# The [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>
	# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the ~~Chida~~ argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions. Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>		# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the [[Chidah]] argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref> Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>
	# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the Radbaz.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3)</ref>		# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the [[Radbaz]].<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3), Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4)</ref>
	# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the Chidah argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim ~~Maarechet~~ Vav Ot 4. See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>		# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the [[Chidah]] argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4). See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
			# He and teh [[Ran]] refer to each other as "Yesh Mi SheKatav."<ref>Shem HaGedolim (Gedolim, Vav 4) citing Shu"t [[Maharikash]] Siman 113</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>
	# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [[Ritva]].		# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [[Ritva]].

MordechaiD at 21:30, 16 July 2018

2018-07-16T21:30:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 16 July 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>
	# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [Ritva].		# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [[Ritva]].
	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:Klalim]]		[[Category:Klalim]]

MordechaiD at 21:30, 16 July 2018

2018-07-16T21:30:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 16 July 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>
	# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the Ritva.		# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the [Ritva].
	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:Klalim]]		[[Category:Klalim]]

MordechaiD: links

2018-06-25T14:31:55Z

links

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 25 June 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	# The Kenesset HaGedolah writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>		# The [[Kenesset HaGedolah]] writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>
	# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the Chida argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his ~~throrough~~ familiarity with the Rashba's opinions. Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the Rashba's opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>		# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the Chida argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his thorough familiarity with the [[Rashba]]'s opinions. Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the [[Rashba]]'s opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>
	# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the Radbaz.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3)</ref>		# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the Radbaz.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3)</ref>
	# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the Chidah argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim Maarechet Vav Ot 4. See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>		# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the Chidah argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim Maarechet Vav Ot 4. See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>

MordechaiD: story

2018-05-28T19:15:24Z

story

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 28 May 2018
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>
			# See [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=46874&st=&pgnum=139 Toldot Chachmei Yisrael (Shulman, vol. 3 page 137)] for a humorous story about him and the Ritva.
	=Sources=		=Sources=
	{{Reflist}}		{{Reflist}}
	[[Category:Klalim]]		[[Category:Klalim]]

MordechaiD: links

2018-05-27T13:21:36Z

links

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 27 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	# The Kenesset HaGedolah writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the Rambam, he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>		# The Kenesset HaGedolah writes that wherever the Maggid Mishneh says he couldn't find a proof for the [[Rambam]], he doesn't agree. <ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 1)</ref> Some even say if he doesn't provide a proof, even without articulating that lack of finding, it's an indication of disagreement.<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 1</ref>
	# A contemporary of the Rivash<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the Rashba<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the Rashba, but the Chida argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his throrough familiarity with the Rashba's opinions. Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the Rashba's opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the Rashba means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>		# A contemporary of the [[Rivash]]<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 473</ref>, the Maggid Mishneh's allegiance to the [[Rashba]]<ref>Matnat Yado fn. 5 writes how the Radbaz claims he was a Talmid of the [[Rashba]], but the Chida argues the dates don't line up.</ref> is indicative through his throrough familiarity with the Rashba's opinions. Therefore, when in doubt as to how to understand the Rashba's opinion, the Maggid Mishneh's understanding is a valuable and acceptable window to determining what the [[Rashba]] means.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 2)</ref> Some say the opposite is therefore a valuable tool of understanding the Maggid Mishneh, as well.<ref>Matnat Yado fn 3</ref>
	# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the Rambam gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the Rambam's position is debatable, according to the Radbaz.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3)</ref>		# His tremendous dedication to elucidating the [[Rambam]] gives the Maggid Mishneh credence in deciding what the true explanation is when the [[Rambam]]'s position is debatable, according to the Radbaz.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 3)</ref>
	# The Rivash posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the Rambam as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the Rambam's position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the Chidah argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim Maarechet Vav Ot 4. See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>		# The [[Rivash]] posits that when the Maggid Mishneh refers to the [[Rambam]] as "HaMechaber" and not "Rabbenu," it indicates lack of satisfaction with the [[Rambam]]'s position on his part,<ref>Shu"t HaRivash Siman 168, Shu"t HaRashbetz vol. 4 Tur 3 Siman 2 end of s.v. ואין לומר, Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 4)</ref> but the Chidah argues that the verbiage is arbitrary.<ref>Shem HaGedolim Maarechet Vav Ot 4. See Sdei Chemed (Klalei HaPoskim 7:1), [http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=56124&st=&pgnum=207&hilite= Kovetz Ohr Yisrael (vol. 54 page 207)], and Matnat Yado fn. 7 at length</ref>
	# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>		# The first three Perakim of Maggid Mishneh on Hilchot Gerushin (until Halacha 9) were not extant even in the times of the Maggid Mishneh himself; what we have printed was probably written by a student, not the Maggid Mishneh himself.<ref>See the last line of Shu"t HaRivash Siman 117. The Kessef Mishneh (Hilchot Ishut 3:5) even refers to the commentary as the Mefaresh. Yad Malachi (Klalei HaRav HaMaggid 5)</ref>
	# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>		# Maggid Mishneh doesn't usually refer to Perush HaMishnayot.<ref>Yad Malachi (Klalei HaTur 26) and Matnat Yado ad loc fn. 88</ref>